Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Perforated Marginal Ulcer After Gastric Bypass (PerforatedMU)
This study has been completed.

First Received on December 26, 2009.   Last Updated on December 31, 2009   History of Changes
Sponsor: University of California, San Francisco
Information provided by: University of California, San Francisco
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01041196
  Purpose

A common late complication after gastric bypass surgery is marginal ulceration that is defined as ulcers at the margins of the gastrojejunostomy, mostly on the jejunal side. Most marginal ulcers respond to medical therapy and complicated or complex ulcer disease warrants operative intervention; specifically, perforated, penetrated, obstructing, bleeding and intractable marginal ulcers require surgical intervention.

Diverse operative strategies for addressing perforated marginal ulcers after gastric bypass have been described including I) Omental (Graham) patch repair, II) Revision of gastrojejunostomy, III) Irrigation and drainage, IV) any previous procedure with truncal vagotomy, V) Esophagojejunostomy, and VI) Reversal. We formally analyze our experience with the laparoscopic resection and repair of acutely perforated marginal ulcers after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), with or without concomitant resolution of technical risk factors for marginal ulceration.


Condition
Ulcer Disease After Gastric Bypass
Marginal Ulcer
Perforated Marginal Ulcer
Acutely Perforated Marginal Ulcer

Study Type: Observational
Study Design: Observational Model: Cohort
Time Perspective: Retrospective
Official Title: Laparoscopic Revision Gastric Bypass Surgery for Perforated Marginal Ulcer: A 10 Year Experience

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by University of California, San Francisco:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Morbidity and mortality [ Time Frame: at discharge, 1 week, 3 weeks, 8 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and annually thereafter for up to 8 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • Recurrence, marginal ulcer. [ Time Frame: at 6 months, 1 year and annually thereafter for up to 8 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Weight loss expressed as Body Mass Index and Percentage of excess weight loss [ Time Frame: at 6 months, 1 year and annually thereafter for up to 8 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Remission or improvement of symptoms [ Time Frame: at 6 months, 1 year and annually thereafter for up to 8 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • Remission or improvement of comorbidities [ Time Frame: at 6 months, 1 year, and annually thereafter for up to 8 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Length of operative time which is defined as the time duration of operation measured in minutes from the first skin incision to the final closure of the skin incision [ Time Frame: It is measured in minutes from the first skin incision to the final closure of the skin incision at the time of revisional surgery under study. It is a transoperative measure of outcome of the surgery under study ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • Length of Hospital Stay which is a measured of surgical recovery quantified and reported in days. It is a hospital pre-discharge traditional measure of outcome. [ Time Frame: It is measured in days from the admission date to the discharge date for the hospitalization pertaining to revisional surgery under study. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Enrollment: 30
Study Start Date: January 2009
Study Completion Date: December 2009
Primary Completion Date: January 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Groups/Cohorts
perforated ulcer after gastric bypass

  Show Detailed Description

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years to 65 Years
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Sampling Method:   Non-Probability Sample
Study Population

Patients who underwent laparoscopic repair of perforated marginal ulcer after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for weight loss.

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Laparoscopic repair of perforated marginal ulcer after RYGB

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Perforated marginal ulcers after other bariatric procedures
  • Repair by open approach
  • Missing records and/or unreachable patients with scant information for analysis
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01041196

Locations
United States, California
UCSF Fresno Center for Medical Education and Research
Fresno, California, United States, 93701
Sponsors and Collaborators
University of California, San Francisco
Investigators
Study Director: Francisco M Tercero, MD Research Associate, University of California San Francisco
Principal Investigator: Kelvin D Higa, MD Professor of Surgery, University of California San Francisco
  More Information

Additional Information:
Publications:
Higa KD, Boone KB, Ho T, Davies OG. Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: technique and preliminary results of our first 400 patients. Arch Surg. 2000 Sep;135(9):1029-33; discussion 1033-4.
Hedley AA, Ogden CL, Johnson CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity among US children, adolescents, and adults, 1999-2002. JAMA. 2004 Jun 16;291(23):2847-50.
McTigue KM, Harris R, Hemphill B, Lux L, Sutton S, Bunton AJ, Lohr KN. Screening and interventions for obesity in adults: summary of the evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2003 Dec 2;139(11):933-49.
Buchwald H, Avidor Y, Braunwald E, Jensen MD, Pories W, Fahrbach K, Schoelles K. Bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2004 Oct 13;292(14):1724-37. Review. Erratum in: JAMA. 2005 Apr 13;293(14):1728.
Christou NV, Sampalis JS, Liberman M, Look D, Auger S, McLean AP, MacLean LD. Surgery decreases long-term mortality, morbidity, and health care use in morbidly obese patients. Ann Surg. 2004 Sep;240(3):416-23; discussion 423-4.
Sjöström L, Narbro K, Sjöström CD, Karason K, Larsson B, Wedel H, Lystig T, Sullivan M, Bouchard C, Carlsson B, Bengtsson C, Dahlgren S, Gummesson A, Jacobson P, Karlsson J, Lindroos AK, Lönroth H, Näslund I, Olbers T, Stenlöf K, Torgerson J, Agren G, Carlsson LM; Swedish Obese Subjects Study. Effects of bariatric surgery on mortality in Swedish obese subjects. N Engl J Med. 2007 Aug 23;357(8):741-52.
Cremieux PY, Buchwald H, Shikora SA, Ghosh A, Yang HE, Buessing M. A study on the economic impact of bariatric surgery. Am J Manag Care. 2008 Sep;14(9):589-96.
Santry HP, Gillen DL, Lauderdale DS. Trends in bariatric surgical procedures. JAMA. 2005 Oct 19;294(15):1909-17.
Flum DR, Khan TV, Dellinger EP. Toward the rational and equitable use of bariatric surgery. JAMA. 2007 Sep 26;298(12):1442-4. No abstract available.
Meguid MM, Glade MJ, Middleton FA. Weight regain after Roux-en-Y: a significant 20% complication related to PYY. Nutrition. 2008 Sep;24(9):832-42. Review.
Nguyen NT. Reoperations and revisions in bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2007 Nov;21(11):1907-8. Epub 2007 Sep 8. No abstract available.
Sapala JA, Wood MH, Sapala MA, Flake TM Jr. Marginal ulcer after gastric bypass: a prospective 3-year study of 173 patients. Obes Surg. 1998 Oct;8(5):505-16.
Higa KD, Boone KB, Ho T. Complications of the laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: 1,040 patients--what have we learned? Obes Surg. 2000 Dec;10(6):509-13.
Sanyal AJ, Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM, Engle KM, Wolfe L. Stomal complications of gastric bypass: incidence and outcome of therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 1992 Sep;87(9):1165-9.
Capella JF, Capella RF. Staple Disruption and Marginal Ulceration in Gastric Bypass Procedures for Weight Reduction. Obes Surg. 1996 Feb;6(1):44-49.
Capella JF, Capella RF. Gastro-gastric fistulas and marginal ulcers in gastric bypass procedures for weight reduction. Obes Surg. 1999 Feb;9(1):22-7; discussion 28.
Jordan JH, Hocking MP, Rout WR, Woodward ER. Marginal ulcer following gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Am Surg. 1991 May;57(5):286-8.
Sacks BC, Mattar SG, Qureshi FG, Eid GM, Collins JL, Barinas-Mitchell EJ, Schauer PR, Ramanathan RC. Incidence of marginal ulcers and the use of absorbable anastomotic sutures in laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006 Jan-Feb;2(1):11-6.
Lublin M, McCoy M, Waldrep DJ. Perforating marginal ulcers after laparoscopic gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2006 Jan;20(1):51-4. Epub 2005 Dec 7.
St Jean MR, Dunkle-Blatter SE, Petrick AT. Laparoscopic management of perforated marginal ulcer after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006 Nov-Dec;2(6):668. No abstract available.
Chin EH, Hazzan D, Sarpel U, Herron DM. Multimedia article. Laparoscopic repair of a perforated marginal ulcer 2 years after gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2007 Nov;21(11):2110. Epub 2007 Aug 18.
Wheeler AA, Matz St, Fearing NM, et al. Laparoscopic repair of perforated marginal ulcer following laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a case series. Surg Endosc 2008; 22:S198 (abstract).
Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Gray J, Fayad C. Reoperation for marginal ulceration. Surg Endosc. 2007 Nov;21(11):1919-21. Epub 2007 Aug 19. Review. No abstract available.
Patel RA, Brolin RE, Gandhi AD. Revisional operations for marginal ulcer after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2008; 4:309 (abstract).
Hata JA, DeMaria EJ, Portenier DD, et al. Marginal ulcer after 1,792 laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) procedures: incidence, medical and surgical treatment and complications. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2008; 4:308-9 (abstract).
Madan AK, DeArmond G, Ternovits CA, Beech DJ, Tichansky DS. Laparoscopic revision of the gastrojejunostomy for recurrent bleeding ulcers after past open revision gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2006 Dec;16(12):1662-8.
Silver R, Levine MS, Williams NN, Rubesin SE. Using radiography to reveal chronic jejunal ischemia as a complication of gastric bypass surgery. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Nov;181(5):1365-7. No abstract available.
Ruutiainen AT, Levine MS, Williams NN. Giant jejunal ulcers after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Abdom Imaging. 2008 Sep-Oct;33(5):575-8.
Wallace JL. Pathogenesis of NSAID-induced gastroduodenal mucosal injury. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2001 Oct;15(5):691-703. Review.
Ben-Meir A, Sonpal I, Patterson L, et al. Cigarette smoking, but not NSAID or alcohol use of comorbidities, is associated with anastomotic ulcer in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2005;1: 263-4.
Kurata JH, Nogawa AN. Meta-analysis of risk factors for peptic ulcer. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, Helicobacter pylori, and smoking. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1997 Jan;24(1):2-17.
Schreiber H, Ben-Meir A, Sonpal I, et al. Cigarette smoking, but not the presence of H.pylori, is associated with anastomotic ulcers in Roux-en-Y gastric bypass patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2005;1:257.
Huang JQ, Sridhar S, Hunt RH. Role of Helicobacter pylori infection and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in peptic-ulcer disease: a meta-analysis. Lancet. 2002 Jan 5;359(9300):14-22.
Yang CS, Lee WJ, Wang HH, Huang SP, Lin JT, Wu MS. The influence of Helicobacter pylori infection on the development of gastric ulcer in symptomatic patients after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2006 Jun;16(6):735-9.
Papasavas PK, Gagné DJ, Donnelly PE, Salgado J, Urbandt JE, Burton KK, Caushaj PF. Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and value of preoperative testing and treatment in patients undergoing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008 May-Jun;4(3):383-8. Epub 2007 Nov 5.
Teyssen S, Singer MV. Alcohol-related diseases of the oesophagus and stomach. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2003 Aug;17(4):557-73. Review.
Bode C, Bode JC. Effect of alcohol consumption on the gut. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2003 Aug;17(4):575-92. Review.
Glauser J, Queen JR. An overview of non-cardiac cocaine toxicity. J Emerg Med. 2007 Feb;32(2):181-6. Epub 2007 Jan 22. Review.
Lee HS, LaMaute HR, Pizzi WF, Picard DL, Luks FI. Acute gastroduodenal perforations associated with use of crack. Ann Surg. 1990 Jan;211(1):15-7. Review.
Arrillaga A, Sosa JL, Najjar R. Laparoscopic patching of crack cocaine-induced perforated ulcers. Am Surg. 1996 Dec;62(12):1007-9.
Sharma R, Organ CH Jr, Hirvela ER, Henderson VJ. Clinical observation of the temporal association between crack cocaine and duodenal ulcer perforation. Am J Surg. 1997 Dec;174(6):629-32; discussion 632-3.
Schuster KM, Feuer WJ, Barquist ES. Outcomes of cocaine-induced gastric perforations repaired with an omental patch. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 Nov;11(11):1560-3. Epub 2007 Aug 15.
Mason EE. Warning patients about cocaine and aspirin. Obes Surg. 1998 Jun;8(3):312-3. No abstract available.
Steinberg KP. Stress-related mucosal disease in the critically ill patient: risk factors and strategies to prevent stress-related bleeding in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2002 Jun;30(6 Suppl):S362-4. Review.
Spirt MJ. Stress-related mucosal disease: risk factors and prophylactic therapy. Clin Ther. 2004 Feb;26(2):197-213. Review.

Responsible Party: Kelvin D Higa, MD; FACS; FASMBS; Professor of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, UCSF Fresno / ALSA Medical Group, Inc. Minimally Invasive Surgery Program
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01041196     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: CMC IRB No. 2008091, U1111-1113-0006
Study First Received: December 26, 2009
Last Updated: December 31, 2009
Health Authority: United States: Institutional Review Board

Keywords provided by University of California, San Francisco:
obesity
ulcer disease
marginal ulcer
perforation
abdominal pain
bariatric surgery
weight loss surgery

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Peptic Ulcer
Ulcer
Duodenal Diseases
Intestinal Diseases
Gastrointestinal Diseases
Digestive System Diseases
Stomach Diseases
Pathologic Processes

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on February 09, 2012