The Effects of Expectation on Natural and Drug -Induced Rewards
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Background:
- Environmental cues frequently induce expectancies in individuals that may strongly influence the actual experience associated with the cue. This has both positive and negative consequences for behavior and decision making. For instance, when an addicted individual experiences cues associated with imminent drug taking, an expectancy of the coming experience is also formed and very likely has an effect on the subsequent experience of the drug.
- Researchers are interested in studying how the brain responds to these kinds of environmental cues and expectancies in order to learn more about addiction and craving in substance-abusing individuals.
Objectives:
- To compare the response to rewards (both drug-related and non-drug-related) in cocaine users and non-using individuals.
- To study the effect of expectation on reward-related (both drug-induced and non-drug-induced) responses and brain activity in cocaine users and non-using individuals.
Eligibility:
-Individuals between 18 and 45 years of age who are regular cocaine users but otherwise healthy, or healthy individuals who are not cocaine users.
Design:
- This study involves two experiments. Participants will be assigned to one or both experiments.
- Participants must not use any drugs for at least 3 days before the visit, may not consume alcohol for 24 hours before the visit, and may not consume caffeinated beverages for 12 hours before the visit. On the day of the visit, participants will provide both urine and breath samples to test for drug/alcohol use.
- Experiment 1: In the MRI scanner, participants will respond to questions and images on a screen, and will receive small amounts of flavored liquid (chocolate or cherry) through a tube in the mouth.
- Experiment 2: In the MRI scanner, participants will respond to questions and images on a screen, and will receive injections of liquid (saline solution or a drug that provides a high' similar to cocaine) through an intravenous line. Participants in this experiment will return for follow-up visits and provide urine samples for further study.
- The specific assignment (to Experiment 1 or Experiment 2 or both experiments) will determine the number of study days and follow-up visits required.
| Condition |
|---|
|
Drug Abuse |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Official Title: | The Effects of Expectation on Natural and Drug -Induced Rewards |
- To compare the response to rewards (drug and non-drug related) in cocaine dependent and non- dependent individuals and study the effect of expectation on reward-related (both drug and non-drug induced) subjective responses and neuronal activity.
- To compare visual and olfactory cues as they relate to receipt of a non-drug reward. Olfactory cues follow a more direct path into the limbic system and thus, may alter reward system functioning differently than do visual cues.
| Estimated Enrollment: | 40 |
| Study Start Date: | September 2004 |
Objective: Environmental cues frequently induce expectancies in the course of normal daily life. When an individual smells and sees the coffee before tasting it, an expectancy of the coming experience is formed that influences the actual experience of consuming the coffee. Similarly, when an addicted individual experiences cues associated with imminent drug taking, an expectancy of the coming experience is also formed. This protocol will examine neural responses to cues predictive of a stimulus (neutral or rewarding) and to the subsequent receipt of the predicted stimulus.
Study Population: Study participants will include 18-45 year old, male and non-pregnant female otherwise healthy cocaine using individuals and control individuals with no abuse or dependence other than possibly nicotine dependence.
Design: The study will employ fMRI to elucidate the neural underpinnings of reward processing. The rewarding stimuli to be studied will be taste stimuli (small squirt of juice or chocolate) and a drug stimulus (intravenous methylphenidate (IV MPH)). For taste stimuli, cues will vary in sensory modality (visual vs. olfactory) and in novelty (well-known vs. novel). Novel and well-known cue stimuli will be included on each experimental day so the development of expectancy can be studied as the cue-taste pairing is learned and compared to the well-known cue-taste pairing. The MPH/saline injections will receive a written cue.
Outcome Measures: BOLD fMRI signal to reward stimuli will be compared in the various cuing conditions.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 45 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
- INCLUSION CRITERIA:
All participants must:
i) Be between the ages of 18-45. Justification: This study aims to further understanding of reward expectancy processes in the adult brain. In addition, it involves intravenous delivery of a stimulant with no potential for direct benefit. It is therefore inappropriate to include children. Many cognitive processes change with age. In addition, the risk of difficult-to-detect medical abnormalities such as silent cerebral infarcts increases with age. Older individuals, defined as those over 45, will, therefore, be excluded. Assessment tool(s): driver's license, birth certificate or other government-issued form of identification.
ii) Be in good health. Justification: Many illnesses can alter fMRI signal, alter cognition, and pose an increased risk of adverse cardiac events following intravenous methylphenidate. Assessment tool(s): Participants will provide a brief health history during phone screening, and undergo a history and physical examination with a qualified IRP clinician.
iii) Be right-handed. Justification: Many of the brain functions to be assessed in this protocol have shown some evidence of being lateralized in the brain. In order to reduce the variance in the data from this possibility, participants must be right-handed. Assessment tool(s): Edinburgh Handedness Inventory.
NIDA.
Cocaine using participants must be regular users of cocaine.
Control participants must not use cocaine nor be dependent on any other drug except perhaps nicotine.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
Participants will be excluded if they:
- Are not suitable to undergo an fMRI experiment due to pregnancy, implanted metallic devices (cardiac pacemaker or neurostimulator, some artificial joints, metal pins, surgical clips or other implanted metal parts), body morphology or claustrophobia. Justification: MR scanning is the primary measurement tool used in the protocol. Assessment tool(s): Prospective participants will fill out an MRI screening questionnaire and undergo an interview with an MR technologist. Pregnancy tests will be performed on all female subjects before each experimental session. Questions concerning suitability for scanning will be referred to the MR Medical Safety Officer. Prospective participants will be questioned about symptoms of claustrophobia and may be placed in the mock scanner during their screening visit to assess for possible difficulty tolerating the confinement of the scanner and for ability to physically fit into the scanner.
- Have cardiovascular disease, including but not limited to clinically significant arrhythmia, coronary artery disease and hypertension. Justification: Significant cardiovascular abnormalities may increase the risk of receiving intravenous methylphenidate, which is likely to produce a transient increase in blood pressure and heart rate. Note: Participants for experiment one may have mild cardiovascular disease not allowable for participants in experiment two. Assessment tool(s): History (including family history) and physical examination by a qualified IRP clinician. Potential participants with SBP NIDA visit average over 140 mm Hg or DBP NIDA visit average over 90 mm Hg or resting pulse NIDA visit average over 100 bpm at rest on three successive NIDA visits will be disqualified. Any abnormality on ECG will be reviewed by cardiology prior to further participation. A 3-minute rhythm strip showing more than 3 PVCs will be exclusionary. The MAI will retain discretion to disqualify at lower levels, depending on the clinical presentation.
- Have coagulopathies, history of or current superficial or deep vein thrombosis, musculoskeletal abnormalities restricting an individual's ability to lie flat for extended periods of time. Justification: MR scanning sessions require participants to lie flat on their backs and remain perfectly still for approximately two hours. Therefore, conditions that would make that difficult (e.g. chronic back pain, significant scoliosis) or dangerous (e.g. familial hypercoagulability syndrome, history of thrombosis) will be exclusionary. Assessment tool(s): History and physical examination by a qualified IRP clinician, supplemented with a trial of lying in the mock scanner to assess comfort issues.
- Have HIV or syphilis. Justification: HIV and syphilis can both have CNS sequelae, thus introducing unnecessary variability into the data. Assessment tool(s): HIV blood test, syphilis serology (positive RPR).
- Have any neurological illnesses to include, but not limited to, seizure disorders, frequent migraine, multiple sclerosis, movement disorders, or CVA, CNS tumor Justification: CNS diseases alter CNS function and, possibly, the neuronal-vascular coupling that forms the basis of the BOLD fMRI signal to be used in this study. Assessment tool(s): History and physical examination by a qualified IRP clinician, urine drug screening for anticonvulsants not disclosed by history.
- Have an abnormality on screening MRI scans that would place the participant at increased risk from blood pressure elevations related to protocol procedures (methylphenidate injections) or would impair the quality of data gathered on the participant. Assessment tool(s): The following MRI scans will be obtained: sagittal T1, axial T2, axial FLAIR, diffusion weighted image, MR angiography, Circle of Willis. (about 15 minutes).
Have other major medical illnesses likely to interfere with study results or safety of an individual during participation. Justification: Many illness not covered here may increase risk or alter important outcome measures. Assessment tool(s): History and physical examination by a qualified IRP clinician and CBC, urinalysis, NIDA chemistry panel (liver function tests, electrolytes, kidney function). The following individual laboratory results will independently disqualify individuals. The MAI will retain discretion to exclude at less extreme values, depending on the clinical presentation.
- Cholesterol > 250 mg/dl
- Hemoglobin < 10.5 g/dl
- WBC < 2400/microl
- LFTs > 3 times normal
- HCG positive
- Serum glucose > 200 mg/dl
- Urine protein > 1 plus
Serum glucose over 140 mg/dl will be followed up with a fasting serum glucose. Those with fasting glucose below 100 mg/dl may be considered for the protocol. Others will be rejected and referred for work up. MAI will make the final judgment on any questionable lab results.
- Have any current major psychiatric disorders to include, but not limited to, mood, anxiety, psychotic disorders, or substance-induced psychiatric disorders Justification: Psychiatric disorders involve the CNS and, therefore, can be expected to alter the fMRI measures being used in this study. Assessment tool(s): Computerized SCID-NP and ASRS (adult ADHD self-report scale) confirmed by clinician interview.
- Regularly use any prescription, over-the-counter or herbal medication that may alter CNS function, cardiovascular function or neuronal-vascular coupling. Justification: Compounds that alter BOLD signal will alter the primary measure used in the study. Assessment tool(s): History and comprehensive urine drug screening to detect antidepressants, benzodiazepines, antipsychotics, anticonvulsants, barbiturates and other common medications and drugs of abuse.
- Are lactating. Justification: Avoidance of possible exposure of an infant to methylphenidate. Assessment tool(s): Clinical interview.
- cognitively impaired or learning disabled. Justification: cognitive impairment and learning disabilities are associated with alterations in brain regions used to accomplish tasks, and, therefore, may introduce significant variably into the data. In addition, cognitive impairment may affect ability to give informed consent. Assessment tool(s): History of known learning disability or cognitive impairment. Vocabulary subtest of the WASI will be given. IQ estimate must be over 85 (corresponding to a vocabulary subtest score > 48). In cases of suspected non-verbal learning disability or mild verbal deficit, a full WASI may be given to obtain a more robust estimate of IQ.
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Betty Jo Salmeron, M.D. | (443) 740-2651 | bsalmeron@intra.nida.nih.gov |
| United States, Maryland | |
| National Institute on Drug Abuse, Biomedical Research Center (BRC) | Recruiting |
| Baltimore, Maryland, United States, 21224 | |
| Contact: For more information contact Mathew's Media Group Recruiting 800-535-8254 researchstudies@mail.nih.gov | |
| Principal Investigator: | Betty Jo Salmeron, M.D. | National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA) |
More Information
Publications:
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01036230 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 999904397, 04-DA-N397 |
| Study First Received: | December 18, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | May 23, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Federal Government |
Keywords provided by National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC):
|
fMRI Methylphenidate Taste Olfaction Addiction |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Substance-Related Disorders Mental Disorders |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013