Combivent Respimat 1-year Safety Study in Patients With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01019694
First received: November 16, 2009
Last updated: February 13, 2013
Last verified: February 2013
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate long-term safety and patient acceptability of COMBIVENT RESPIMAT Inhalation Spray as compared to the COMBIVENT Inhalation Aerosol Chlorofluorocarbon-Metered Dose Inhaler (CFC-MDI) and the free combination of ATROVENT Hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) and albuterol Hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) inhalation aerosols.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive |
Drug: Combivent CFC-MDI Drug: Combivent Respimat 20/100 mcg Drug: Atrovent HFA 42 mcg + Albuterol HFA 200 mcg |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Patient Acceptability of Ipratropium Bromide/Albuteroll Delivered by the Respimat® Inhaler in Adults With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease |
Resource links provided by NLM:
MedlinePlus related topics:
COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease)
Drug Information available for:
Albuterol
Ipratropium bromide
Levalbuterol
Levalbuterol hydrochloride
Albuterol sulfate
Levalbuterol tartrate
U.S. FDA Resources
Further study details as provided by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 48 [ Time Frame: 48 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 3 [ Time Frame: 3 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).
- Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).
- Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 24 [ Time Frame: 24 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).
- Performance Domain Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 36 [ Time Frame: 36 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Patient acceptability was assessed with the Performance Domain score from the PASAPQ. The score is a mean of 7 items on a scale from 0 (very dissatisfied) to 100 (very satisfied).
- Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 3 [ Time Frame: 3 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
- Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 12 [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
- Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 24 [ Time Frame: 24 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
- Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 36 [ Time Frame: 36 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
- Overall Satisfaction Score From the Patient Satisfaction and Preference Questionnaire (PASAPQ) at Week 48 [ Time Frame: 48 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Patient satisfaction was assessed by asking: "Overall, how satisfied are you with your inhaler?". Responses were made on a scale from 1 (very dissatisfied) to 7 (very satisfied).
- Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 3 [ Time Frame: 3 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).
- Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 12 [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).
- Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 24 [ Time Frame: 24 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).
- Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 36 [ Time Frame: 36 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).
- Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) Symptom Domain Score at Week 48 [ Time Frame: 48 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]CCQ symptom domain score assessed patient feelings or limitations due to their COPD on a scale from 0 (not limited) to 6 (totally limited).
- Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 3 [ Time Frame: 3 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).
- Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 12 [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).
- Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 24 [ Time Frame: 24 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).
- Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 36 [ Time Frame: 36 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).
- Physician's Global Evaluation at Week 48 [ Time Frame: 48 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Physicians evaluated the patient's overall clinical condition on a scale ranging from "poor" (score 1 or 2) to "excellent" (score 7 or 8).
- Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Day 1 [ Time Frame: baseline, day 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose on test day 1.
- Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 12 [ Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose at Week 12
- Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 24 [ Time Frame: baseline, 24 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose at Week 24
- Change From Baseline in FEV1 at Week 48 [ Time Frame: baseline, 48 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Change from test-day baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 1 hour post dose at Week 48
- Change From Baseline in FVC at Day 1 [ Time Frame: baseline, day 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose on test day 1.
- Change From Baseline in FVC at Week 12 [ Time Frame: baseline, 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose at Week 12
- Change From Baseline in FVC at Week 24 [ Time Frame: baseline, 24 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose at Week 24
- Change From Baseline in FVC at Week 48 [ Time Frame: baseline, 48 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Change from test-day baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at 1 hour post dose at Week 48
- Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 3 [ Time Frame: 3 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 12 [ Time Frame: 12 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 24 [ Time Frame: 24 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 36 [ Time Frame: 36 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean Number of Puffs of Daily Rescue Medication Use in Two Weeks Prior to Week 48 [ Time Frame: 48 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of Patients Having Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations [ Time Frame: 48 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of Patients Having Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Exacerbations Leading to Hospitalization [ Time Frame: 48 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 470 |
| Study Start Date: | November 2009 |
| Primary Completion Date: | April 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Combivent Respimat 20/100 microgram(mcg)
patient to take 1 inhalation 4 times a day
|
Drug: Combivent Respimat 20/100 mcg
Open label randomized parallel
|
|
Active Comparator: Combivent CFC-MDI 36/206 microgram-mcg
patient to take 2 inhalations 4 times a day
|
Drug: Combivent CFC-MDI
36/206 mcg Four times a day (QID)
|
|
Active Comparator: Atrovent HFA 42 mcg + Albuterol HFA
patient to take 2 inhalations of each 4 times a day
|
Drug: Atrovent HFA 42 mcg + Albuterol HFA 200 mcg
Open label randomized parallel
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 40 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
- All patients must sign an informed consent consistent with International Conference on Harmonization (ICH) Good Clinical Practice (GCP) guidelines prior to participation in the trial.
- Male or female patients 40 years of age or older.
- Patients must be current or ex-smokers with a smoking history of 10 pack-years. (Patients who have never smoked cigarettes must be excluded) Pack Years = Number of cigarettes/day x years of smoking 20 cigarettes/pack
- All patients must have a diagnosis of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (P95-4381), and must meet the following spirometric criteria at Visit 1:Relatively stable, moderate to severe airway obstruction with a post-bronchodilator Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1) < 80% of predicted normal and FEV1/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) < 70%. Spirometry should be done at baseline and approximately 1/2 hour following 4 inhalations of albuterol. Predicted normal values will be calculated according to European Coal and Steel Community (ECSC), European Community for Coal and Steel (ECCS), (R94-1408). For Height measured in inches Males: FEV1 predicted (L) = 4.30 x [height (inches) / 39.37]-0.029 x age (yrs) - 2.49 Females: FEV1 predicted (L) = 3.95 x [height (inches) / 39.37]-0.025 x age (yrs) - 2.60 For Height measured in meters Males: FEV1 predicted (L) = 4.30 x [height (meters)] - 0.029 x age (years) -2.49 Females: FEV1 predicted (L) = 3.95 x [height (meters)] - 0.025 x age (years) - 2.60
- Patients must be able to perform all study related procedures and maintain study records during the study period as required in the protocol.
- Patients must be able to inhale medication in a competent manner from the RESPIMAT inhaler and from a metered dose inhaler (MDI).
Exclusion criteria:
- Patients with significant diseases other than COPD will be excluded. A significant disease is defined as a disease which in the opinion of the investigator may either put the patient at risk because of participation in the study or a disease which may influence the results of the study or the patient's ability to participate in the study.
- Patients with a recent history (i.e., one year or less) of myocardial infarction.
- Patients who have been hospitalized or being treated for heart failure within the past year.
- Patients with clinically unstable or life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia requiring intervention or change in drug therapy within the past year.
- Patients with a malignancy for which patient has undergone resection, radiation therapy or chemotherapy within last five years (patients with fully cured squamous cell or treated basal cell carcinoma are allowed).
- Patients with a history of life-threatening pulmonary obstruction, or a history of cystic fibrosis or clinically evident bronchiectasis.
- Patients who have undergone thoracotomy with pulmonary resection. Patients with a history of a thoracotomy for other reasons should be evaluated as per exclusion criterion No. 1.
- Patients with a current diagnosis of asthma.
- Patients with a history of significant alcohol or drug abuse.
- Patients with known active tuberculosis.
- Patients using beta blocker medications are excluded. Cardioselective beta blockers are allowed with caution. Beta blocker eye medications for treatment of non-narrow angle glaucoma are allowed.
- Patients who regularly use daytime oxygen therapy for more than 1 hour per day Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP for sleep apnea is allowed).
- Patients using oral corticosteroid medication at a dose in excess of the equivalent of 10 mg of prednisone per day or 20 mg every other day, except as required for treatment of exacerbation during the study.
- Pregnant or nursing women.
- Women of childbearing potential not using a medically approved means of contraception (i.e., oral or injectable contraceptives, intrauterine devices or diaphragm with spermicide, or transdermal hormonal patches). Abstinence will not be accepted as a medically approved means of contraception. Female patients will be considered to be of childbearing potential unless surgically sterilized by hysterectomy or bilateral tubal ligation, or post-menopausal for at least two years.
- Patients with known hypersensitivity to anticholinergic drugs, any other component of the ipratropium bromide/albuterol RESPIMAT solution including Benzalkonium chloride (BAC) and Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) or the ipratropium bromide/albuterol Chlorofluorocarbons (CFC) MDI or Hydrofluoroalkane (HFA) components.
- Previous participation in this study. (The patient cannot re-enroll into this study.)
- Patients who are currently participating in another interventional study.
- Patients who have taken an investigational drug within 1 month or 6 half lives (whichever is greater) prior to screening.
- Patients currently in any pulmonary rehabilitation program or scheduled to participate in any such program during the study period.
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01019694
Show 55 Study Locations
Show 55 Study LocationsSponsors and Collaborators
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals
Investigators
| Study Chair: | Boehringer Ingelheim | Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals |
More Information
Additional Information:
Related Info 
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01019694 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 1012.62 |
| Study First Received: | November 16, 2009 |
| Results First Received: | April 5, 2012 |
| Last Updated: | February 13, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Chronic Disease Lung Diseases Respiration Disorders Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Lung Diseases, Obstructive Disease Attributes Pathologic Processes Respiratory Tract Diseases Albuterol Ipratropium Tocolytic Agents Reproductive Control Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions |
Therapeutic Uses Adrenergic beta-2 Receptor Agonists Adrenergic beta-Agonists Adrenergic Agonists Adrenergic Agents Neurotransmitter Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Bronchodilator Agents Autonomic Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Anti-Asthmatic Agents Respiratory System Agents Cholinergic Antagonists Cholinergic Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013