|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsor: | Brighton & Sussex Medical School |
|---|---|
| Collaborators: |
Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust |
| Information provided by: | Brighton & Sussex Medical School |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01006382 |
Purpose
Anaphylaxis is a severe and potentially life threatening allergic reaction which can affect the airway, breathing and/or circulation. This reaction can be triggered by a number of different allergens but the most common are food, medications, insect venom and latex. Because these reactions occur suddenly and are potentially very serious, the best management lies in the correct use of the prescribed emergency medication. Epinephrine, or adrenaline as it is more commonly known, is the recommended drug for the treatment of anaphylaxis. Injecting the epinephrine into the outer thigh muscle is the preferred route of administration. For health professionals, patients and carers, this rapid administration is facilitated by the manufacture of preloaded syringes and autoinjectors. Despite the availability of these devices, a review of studies shows poor knowledge and skills amongst both health professionals and patients with regards to using autoinjectable epinephrine devices correctly. These studies found that as well as poor knowledge in using the autoinjectors, there was a lack of confidence amongst patients and an unwillingness to carry the device with them at all times.
In other disease groups like asthma and diabetes, psychological models which involve asking people how they think about their illness and their related behaviours, have been found to help in the understanding of why some people follow or adhere to health professionals advice and why others do not. Based on these findings, this study will look at two appropriate psychological models and their ability to predict variation in adherence to self-care regimens in adolescents and young adults with food allergy related anaphylaxis.
| Condition |
|---|
|
Food Allergy |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Time Perspective: Cross-Sectional |
| Official Title: | To What Extent do Social Cognition Models Explain Adherence to Self-care Regimens in Adolescents and Young Adults With Food Allergy |
| Estimated Enrollment: | 275 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2010 |
| Study Completion Date: | March 2011 |
| Primary Completion Date: | March 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Groups/Cohorts |
|---|
|
Adolescents and young adults with food allergy
Adolescents aged 13-21 years with a diagnosis of food allergy
|
Show Detailed Description
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 13 Years to 21 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Non-Probability Sample |
Hospital and community sample
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Contacts and Locations| United Kingdom | |
| Royal Alexandra Children's Hospital | |
| Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom, BN2 5BE | |
| Brighton General Hospital | |
| Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom, BN2 3EW | |
| Brighton & Sussex Medical School | |
| Brighton, East Sussex, United Kingdom, BN1 9PH | |
| St Thomas' Hospital | |
| London, United Kingdom, SE1 7EH | |
| Principal Investigator: | Christina J Jones, BA MSc | Brighton & Sussex Medical School |
More Information
| Responsible Party: | Miss Christina Jones, Brighton & Sussex Medical School |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01006382 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 09/H1102/100, 09/164/JON |
| Study First Received: | October 30, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | June 21, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United Kingdom: National Health Service |
|
Hypersensitivity Food Hypersensitivity Immune System Diseases Hypersensitivity, Immediate |