Comparison of the FemoSeal® Arterial Closure Device to Manual Compression After Coronary Angiography (CLOSE-UP I)
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Skejby Hospital
Collaborator:
Vingmed Danmark A/S
Information provided by:
Skejby Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01001663
First received: October 16, 2009
Last updated: November 9, 2010
Last verified: October 2009
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Is the FemoSeal® closure device safer and more comfortable than manual compression for femoral artery access closure after coronary angiography?
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Coronary Angiography Via Femoral Artery Access |
Device: FemoSeal® Other: Manual compression |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Comparison of the FemoSeal® Arterial Closure Device to Manual Compression After Coronary Angiography: the CLOSE-UP I Randomized Trial |
Further study details as provided by Skejby Hospital:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Rate of ipsilateral palpable groin hematomas with largest diameter exceeding 5 cm. [ Time Frame: 20 minutes, 1 hour and at discharge, pooled ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Rate of ipsilateral palpable groin hematomas with largest diameter exceeding 5 cm. Patient self-measurements. [ Time Frame: 14 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Composite of: major vascular complications necessitating surgical repair, A-V fistulation, pseudoaneurysm needing treatment, major bleeding needing transfusion and infection needing antibiotics . [ Time Frame: 14 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Time to hemostasis, from sheath removal to hemostasis is achieved [ Time Frame: 14 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Time from end of closure procedure to ambulation. 1h bedrest recommended. [ Time Frame: 14 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Device deployment failure [ Time Frame: 20 minutes ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Time to cessation of continuous minor oozing measured from the end of the closure procedure [ Time Frame: 14 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Need for repeated manual compression after end of the closure procedure [ Time Frame: 14 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Pain and discomfort measured on a numerical pain rating scale (0-10) [ Time Frame: 20 min ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Vasovagal reaction (clinical signs AND Systolic BP drop of more than 30 mmHg AND/OR pulse drop more than 30 b/min. AND reversible immediately after treatment by atropin, fluids) [ Time Frame: 20 minutes ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- The patient seeking medical assistance for all-cause closure site related symptoms after discharge. [ Time Frame: 14 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Pain and discomfort measured on a numerical pain rating scale (0-10) [ Time Frame: 1 hour ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Pain and discomfort measured on a numerical pain rating scale (0-10) [ Time Frame: Discharge ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Pain and discomfort measured on a numerical pain rating scale (0-10) [ Time Frame: 14 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 1005 |
| Study Start Date: | September 2009 |
| Study Completion Date: | September 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | September 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Experimental: FemoSeal® |
Device: FemoSeal®
Closure device for femoral artery access closure
|
| Active Comparator: Manual compression |
Other: Manual compression
Conventional manual compression
|
Detailed Description:
Access site complication after coronary angiography is still a challenge in everyday practice. The FemoSeal® closure device has proven very safe as shown in the swedish SCAAR registry. This study is aimed to investigate, in a randomized design, if the FemoSeal® has an advantage in safety and efficacy over manual compression.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- The patient must be at least 18 years old
- Patients undergoing femoral access coronary angiography
- Patient must be competent for providing informed, written consent
- Only 6F sheath
Exclusion Criteria:
- Percutaneous coronary intervention
- Intra coronary measurements (FFR, IVUS, OCT, NIR)
- Groin hematoma before closure
- Pseudoaneurysm or AV fistula
- Significant stenosis of ilial or femoral artery
- Prior peripheral artery surgery
- INR > 3,0
- Platelet count < 120 million per millilitre blood
- Coagulopathy (bleeding disorder)
- Thrombolysis in the last 24h
- Planned heparin infusion after the procedure
- Pregnancy
- Uncontrolled hypertension > 200 mmHg / 110 mmHg
- Femoral access device closure in the last 30 days
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Niels R. Holm MD, PI, Skejby Hospital |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01001663 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | M-20090101 |
| Study First Received: | October 16, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | November 9, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | Denmark: Danish Dataprotection Agency Denmark: The Regional Committee on Biomedical Research Ethics |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 22, 2013