ASPECCT: A Study of Panitumumab Efficacy and Safety Compared to Cetuximab in Subjects With KRAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
This study is currently recruiting participants.
Verified May 2013 by Amgen
Sponsor:
Amgen
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Amgen
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT01001377
First received: October 22, 2009
Last updated: May 6, 2013
Last verified: May 2013
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The primary objective of this study is to compare the effect of panitumumab versus cetuximab on overall survival (OS) for chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) among subjects with wild-type Kirsten rat Sarcoma-2 virus (KRAS) tumors.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer |
Drug: Cetuximab (Erbitux) Drug: Panitumumab (Vectibix) |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Randomized, Multicenter, Open-label, Phase 3 Study to Compare the Efficacy and Safety of Panitumumab and Cetuximab in Subjects With Previously Treated, Wild-type KRAS, Metastatic Colorectal Cancer |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by Amgen:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- To compare the effect of panitumumab versus cetuximab on overall survival for chemorefractory mCRC among subjects with wild-type KRAS tumors. [ Time Frame: 4 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- To compare safety of panitumumab vs cetuximab for mCRC among subjects with wild-type KRAS tumors. [ Time Frame: 4 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- To compare patient reported outcomes of panitumumab vs cetuximab for mCRC among subjects with wild-type KRAS tumors. [ Time Frame: 4 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- To compare progression-free survival of panitumumab vs cetuximab for mCRC among subjects with wild-type KRAS tumors. [ Time Frame: 4 years. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- To compare objective response rate of panitumumab vs cetuximab for mCRC among subjects with wild-type KRAS tumors. [ Time Frame: 4 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- To compare time to response of panitumumab vs cetuximab for mCRC among subjects with wild-type KRAS tumors. [ Time Frame: 4 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- To compare time to treatment failure of panitumumab vs cetuximab for mCRC among subjects with wild-type KRAS tumors. [ Time Frame: 4 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- To compare duration of response of panitumumab vs cetuximab for mCRC among subjects with wild-type KRAS tumors. [ Time Frame: 4 years ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 1000 |
| Study Start Date: | February 2010 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | September 2014 |
| Primary Completion Date: | February 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Cetuximab
Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 as an initial dose, followed by 250 mg/m2 IV every 7 days
|
Drug: Cetuximab (Erbitux)
400 mg/m2 as an initial dose, followed by 250 mg/m2 IV every 7 days
|
|
Experimental: Panitumumab
Panitumumab (Vectibix) 6 mg/kg IV every 14 days
|
Drug: Panitumumab (Vectibix)
6 mg/kg IV every 14 days
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed diagnosis of adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum, metastatic disease
- Wild-type KRAS tumor status
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score of 0, 1 or 2
- Must have failed a prior regimen containing irinotecan for metastatic disease and a prior regimen containing oxaliplatin for metastatic disease
- Must have previously received a thymidylate synthase inhibitor (eg, fluorouracil, capecitabine, raltitrexed, or fluorouracil-uracil) at any point for treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC)
- Adequate hematologic, renal, hepatic and metabolic function
Exclusion Criteria:
- Symptomatic brain metastases requiring treatment
- Prior anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFr) antibody therapy (eg, panitumumab or cetuximab) or treatment with small molecule EGFr inhibitors (eg, gefitinib, erlotinib, lapatinib)
- Antitumor therapy (eg, chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, immunotherapy, antibody therapy, radiotherapy), or investigational agent or therapy ≤ 30 days before randomization.
- Clinically significant cardiovascular disease
- Active infection requiring systemic treatment or any uncontrolled infection ≤14 days prior to randomization
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01001377
Show 155 Study Locations
Contacts
| Contact: Amgen Call Center | 866-572-6436 |
Show 155 Study LocationsSponsors and Collaborators
Amgen
Investigators
| Study Director: | MD | Amgen |
More Information
Additional Information:
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Amgen |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT01001377 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 20080763, ASPECCT |
| Study First Received: | October 22, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | May 6, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Quorom Institutional Review Board India: Central Drugs Standard Control Organization South Korea: Korea Food & Drug Administration Taiwan: Department of Health South Africa: Department of Health Serbia: Medicine and Medical Devices Agency of Serbia Peru: Ministry of Health United States: Institutional Review Board Australia: Department of Health and Ageing Therapeutic Goods Administration Belgium: Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products (FAMHP) Canada: Health Canada Czech Republic: State Institute for Drug Control EU: CHMP France: Afssaps - Agence française de sécurité sanitaire des produits de santé (Saint-Denis) Hong Kong: Department of Health Italy: Ethics Committee Latvia: State Agency of Medicines Lithuania: State Medicines Control Agency of Lithuania Malaysia: National Pharmaceutical Control Bureau Netherlands:Centrale Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek (CCMO) Phillippines: the Bureau of Food and Drugs Poland: Ministry of Health Russia: Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation Singapore: Health Science Authority Slovakia: State Institiute for Drug Control South Korea: Korea Food and Drug Administration Sweden: Medical Products Agency United Kingdom: Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by Amgen:
|
Panitumumab Vectibix Colon Cancer Colorectal Cancer |
Rectal Cancer Cetuximab Erbitux Metastatic |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Colorectal Neoplasms Intestinal Neoplasms Gastrointestinal Neoplasms Digestive System Neoplasms Neoplasms by Site Neoplasms Digestive System Diseases Gastrointestinal Diseases Colonic Diseases |
Intestinal Diseases Rectal Diseases Antibodies, Monoclonal Cetuximab Immunologic Factors Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions Antineoplastic Agents Therapeutic Uses |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013