Unilateral Versus Bilateral Endoscopic Lung Volume Reduction A Comparative Case Study
Recruitment status was Recruiting
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Patients with bilateral heterogeneous pulmonary emphysema benefit to differing degrees from unilateral ELVR with complete lobe closure in comparison with incomplete bilateral treatment.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Pulmonary Emphysema |
Device: IBV Implantation |
Phase 2 Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Unilateral vs. Bilateral IBV Placement |
- Improvement in pulmonary function (FEV1) 6-minute walking test [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of major complications(SAE) [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Evaluation of the IBV migration rate [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Average changes in quality of life (SGRQ) [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Average changes in pulmonary function (FEV1, IVC, RV, TLC, RV/TLC) [ Time Frame: 3 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 20 |
| Study Start Date: | September 2009 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | May 2011 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | May 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: bilateral
Treatment arm B - incomplete bilateral treatment of in total two lobes (contralateral). The study will only use Intrabronchial Valves™ |
Device: IBV Implantation
In severe cases of COPD even optimum treatment involving bronchodilatation with drugs, physical training and possibly oxygen therapy is unable to influence exercise capacity and the perception of dyspnoea to a sufficient extent. Given the assumption that the elastic recoil of the small airways can be improved by a reduction in lung volume and pulmonary function overall by more ergonomic breathing mechanics and diaphragm function, various endoscopic procedures for lung volume reduction are available. Here one of the most advanced techniques is the implantation of intrabronchial valves. The one-way mechanism of this valve allows air to escape from the downstream lung segment without any influx of "new" air during inspiration
Other Name: Spiration IBV
|
|
Active Comparator: unilateral
Treatment arm A - unilateral treatment with complete closure of the worst lobe of the lungs
|
Device: IBV Implantation
In severe cases of COPD even optimum treatment involving bronchodilatation with drugs, physical training and possibly oxygen therapy is unable to influence exercise capacity and the perception of dyspnoea to a sufficient extent. Given the assumption that the elastic recoil of the small airways can be improved by a reduction in lung volume and pulmonary function overall by more ergonomic breathing mechanics and diaphragm function, various endoscopic procedures for lung volume reduction are available. Here one of the most advanced techniques is the implantation of intrabronchial valves. The one-way mechanism of this valve allows air to escape from the downstream lung segment without any influx of "new" air during inspiration
Other Name: Spiration IBV
|
Detailed Description:
Patient enrolment and data acquisition is to be carried out on a prospective basis. It is planned to enrol a total of 20 patients with bilateral heterogeneous pulmonary emphysema. All patients will undergo treatment at one study centre in Heidelberg. Patients will be considered for both unilateral and bilateral treatment with intrabronchial valves (IBV) on the basis of their emphysema distribution. Patients will be randomised to two treatment arms. 10 patients receive unilateral or bilateral treatment in each case.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 40 Years to 80 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- age > 40 inhomogeneous emphysema FEV1 between 20-40% DLCO between 20-40% 6MWT > 150 m
Exclusion Criteria:
- pregnant homogeneous disease FEV1 < 20%
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Felix JF Herth, MD | +49 6221 396 ext 1200 | Felix.Herth@thoraxklinik-heidelberg.de |
| Contact: Ralf Eberhardt, MD | +49 6221 396 ext 1204 | Ralf.Eberhardt@rthoraxklinik-heidelberg.de |
| Germany | |
| Thoraxklinik Heidelberg | Recruiting |
| Heidelberg, Germany, 69126 | |
| Contact: Felix JF Herth, MD +49 6221 396 ext 1200 Felix.Herth@thoraxklinik-heidelberg.de | |
| Principal Investigator: | Felix JF Herth, MD | University of Heidelberg |
More Information
Publications:
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | Prof. Felix JF Herth, Thoraxklinik Heidelberg |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00995852 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 09 2009 |
| Study First Received: | October 14, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | April 26, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices |
Keywords provided by University of Heidelberg:
|
Endoscopic lung volume reduction emphysema COPD Patients with bilateral heterogeneous pulmonary emphysema |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Emphysema Pulmonary Emphysema Pathologic Processes Lung Diseases Respiratory Tract Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 21, 2013