|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsor: | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) |
|---|---|
| Information provided by: | National Institutes of Health Clinical Center (CC) |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00944749 |
Purpose
Background:
Objectives:
- To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of horse-ATG (with cyclosporine) in increasing blood counts and reducing the need for transfusions in aplastic anemia patients who have failed to respond to prior immunosuppressive treatment with rabbit-ATG and cyclosporine.
Eligibility:
- Patients 2 years of age and older who have consistently low blood platelet counts related to aplastic anemia that has not responded to conventional treatment with rabbit-ATG.
Design:
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Anemia, Aplastic Anemia, Hypoplastic |
Drug: h-ATG (ATGAM(Registered Trademark)) Drug: Cyclosporine (Gengraf(Registered Trademark)) |
Phase II |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Non-Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Horse ATG/CsA in Aplastic Anemia Patients Unresponsive to or With a Suboptimal Response to Rabbit ATG/CsA Treatment |
| Estimated Enrollment: | 25 |
| Study Start Date: | July 2009 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2013 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | December 2013 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Severe aplastic anemia (SAA), characterized by pancytopenia and a hypocellular bone marrow, is effectively treated by immunosuppressive therapy, usually a combination of antithymocyte globulin (ATG) and cyclosporine (CsA). Survival rates following this regimen are equivalent to those achieved with allogeneic stem cells transplantation. However, approximately 1/3 of patients will not show blood count improvement after ATG/CsA. General experience and small pilot studies have suggested that such patients benefit from further immunosuppression. Furthermore, analysis of our own clinical data suggests that patients with minimal blood count responses to a single course of ATG, even when transfusion independence is achieved, have a markedly worse prognosis than patients with robust hematologic improvement.
The majority of the experience in the US and worldwide has been with horse ATG (h-ATG) plus CsA as initial therapy in SAA. Rabbit ATG (r-ATG) plus CsA has been employed successfully in about 1/3 of cases in those who are refractory to initial h-ATG/CsA (current NHLBI Protocol 03-H-0249). In recent years, h-ATG and r-ATG have been used interchangeably in treatment-naive patients, and initial therapy with r-ATG/CsA is now frequent in the US and the only option in Europe and Japan, where h-ATG is no longer available. An active NHLBI randomized study is comparing the efficacy of h- and r-ATG as initial therapy in SAA, and the results from a recently completed interim analysis suggest that the hematologic response rate ultimately may not be comparable between these two agents (Protocol 06-H-0034). There is no published report on the outcome of repeat immunosuppressive therapy in those patients refractory to initial r-ATG/CsA, and thus the management of these patients is uncertain. We therefore propose this study of h-ATG/CsA in SAA patients who are refractory or have a suboptimal response to r-ATG.
The primary endpoint will be the response rate at 3 months where response is defined as no longer meeting criteria for SAA.
The primary objective is to evaluate the effectiveness (response rate) at 3 months of a second course of immunosuppression with h-ATG/CsA in subjects refractory to or with a suboptimal response to a course of r-ATG/CsA or cyclophosphamide at least 3 months post treatment.
Secondary objectives include robustness of hematologic recovery, relapse, response rate at 6 months, clonal evolution and overall survival.
The primary endpoint will be changes in absolute neutrophil count, platelet count, reticulocyte count at 3 months.
Secondary endpoints will include time to relapse, changes in cytogenetics, time to death.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 2 Years to 82 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
Diagnosed with SAA characterized by:
i. Absolute neutrophil count < 500/ microL
ii. Platelet count < 20,000/ microL
iii. Reticulocyte count < 60,000/ microL
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Patient Recruitment and Public Liaison Office | (800) 411-1222 | prpl@mail.cc.nih.gov |
| Contact: TTY | 1-866-411-1010 |
| United States, Maryland | |
| National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike | Recruiting |
| Bethesda, Maryland, United States, 20892 | |
| Sub-Investigator: Patient Recruitment and Public Liaison Office (PRPL) For more information at the NIH Clinical Center contact | |
More Information
| Responsible Party: | Phillip Scheinberg, M.D./National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00944749 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 090183, 09-H-0183 |
| Study First Received: | July 22, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | December 23, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Federal Government |
|
H- ATG Anti -Thymocyte Globulin Lymphocyte Immune Globulin Aplastic Anemia |
|
Anemia Anemia, Aplastic Hematologic Diseases Bone Marrow Diseases Cyclosporins Cyclosporine Enzyme Inhibitors Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Pharmacologic Actions |
Immunosuppressive Agents Immunologic Factors Physiological Effects of Drugs Antifungal Agents Anti-Infective Agents Therapeutic Uses Dermatologic Agents Antirheumatic Agents |