A Comparison of INSORB Staples With Metal Staples in Total Hip Replacement
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to compare the use of INSORB absorbable staples with metal staples on surgical incision healing after total hip replacement. The study evaluates wound healing, complications, and patient satisfaction regarding wound comfort and appearance after surgery.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Erythema Drainage Bruising Pain |
Device: Insorb staples Device: metal staples (Ethicon metal stapler) |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Health Services Research |
| Official Title: | A Comparison of INSORB Staples With Metal Staples in Total Hip Replacement |
- Appearance [ Time Frame: Dishcarge, 2 weeks & 6 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Photographs, CRF [ Time Frame: Discharge, 2 weeks & 6 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 60 |
| Study Start Date: | July 2007 |
| Study Completion Date: | July 2009 |
| Primary Completion Date: | November 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Insorb staples
Subcuticular Absorbable staples
|
Device: Insorb staples
absorbable staples required for wound closure
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Control
Metal staple wound closure
|
Device: metal staples (Ethicon metal stapler)
wound closure with metal staples
Other Name: Ethicon metal stapler
|
Detailed Description:
Subcuticular closure of wounds can provide superior results to percutaneous suture closure due to the elimination of suture or staple tracts. These tracts can lead to infection and migration of epithelial cells adding to scarring, and cross-hatching scars which remain after healing. Absorbable staples can provide a rapid, secure, subcuticular closure of skin as an alternative to the traditional, manual staple or suture closure. This study will compare INSORB absorbable staples to externally applied standard metal staples with respect to effectiveness of incision closure, acute healing, subject comfort level, security and appearance after total hip replacement.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient is 18 years or older
- Patient or legal representative is able to understand and provide signed consent for the procedure
- Patient is willing and able to return for required follow-up visits
- Patient needs a total hip arthroplasty surgical procedure
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient has an active infection
- Patient is enrolled in another similar study
- Patient has a known history of hepatitis
- Patient has a known history of HIV
- Patient has a known history of AIDs
- Patient has a known history of IV drug abuse
Contacts and Locations| United States, Indiana | |
| Indiana Orthopaedic Hospital | |
| Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46278 | |
| Principal Investigator: | David A Fisher, MD | Indiana Orthopaedic Hospital |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Orthopaedic Research Foundation |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00940446 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | DAF_PC000001 |
| Study First Received: | July 14, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | November 8, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by Orthopaedic Research Foundation:
|
Insorb staples Metal Staples |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Contusions Erythema Wounds and Injuries Wounds, Nonpenetrating Skin Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013