Comparison of AZD6244 in Combination With Dacarbazine Versus (vs) Dacarbazine Alone in BRAF Mutation Positive Melanoma Patients
This study is ongoing, but not recruiting participants.
Sponsor:
AstraZeneca
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
AstraZeneca
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00936221
First received: July 8, 2009
Last updated: March 19, 2013
Last verified: March 2013
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
To assess the efficacy in terms of overall survival of AZD6244 in combination with dacarbazine, compared with dacarbazine alone, in first line patients with BRAF mutation positive advanced cutaneous or unknown primary melanoma
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Melanoma |
Drug: AZD2644 Drug: Dacarbazine |
Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Phase II, Double-blind, Randomised Study to Assess the Efficacy of AZD6244 in Combination With Dacarbazine Compared With Dacarbazine Alone in First Line Patients With BRAF Mutation Positive Advanced Cutaneous or Unknown Primary Melanoma |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by AstraZeneca:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- To assess the efficacy in terms of overall survival of AZD6244 in combination with dacarbazine, compared with dacarbazine alone, in first line patients with BRAF mutation positive advanced cutaneous or unknown primary melanoma [ Time Frame: Overall survival calculated as the interval from date of randomisation to date of patient death (any cause). Patients who have not died at final analysis, or who withdraw consent, will be censored at last date they were known to be alive. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- To further assess the efficacy in terms of-Alive and Progression Free at 6 months (APF6)- Progression Free Survival (PFS)- Objective Response Rate (ORR)- Duration of Response (DoR)- Change in tumour size at 12 weeks [ Time Frame: APF6, PFS, ORR, DoR, and change in tumour size at 12 weeks will be assessed using RECIST measurements. RECIST assessments to be carried out at baseline, week 12 and every 12 weeks thereafter relative to randomisation ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- To assess the safety and tolerability profile of AZD6244 in combination with dacarbazine [ Time Frame: At every visit (ie weekly for the first 6 weeks and then every 3 weeks) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- To investigate the pharmacokinetics of AZD6244 [ Time Frame: At Day 1 and Day 22 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 91 |
| Study Start Date: | July 2009 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | June 2013 |
| Primary Completion Date: | November 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: 1
AZD6244 in combination with dacarbazine
|
Drug: AZD2644
oral capsules, 75mg twice daily
Drug: Dacarbazine
1000 mg/m2 iv infusion over at least 60 min. on day 1 of each 21 cycle
Other Name: DTIC
|
|
Placebo Comparator: 2
Placebo in combination with dacarbazine
|
Drug: Dacarbazine
1000 mg/m2 iv infusion over at least 60 min. on day 1 of each 21 cycle
Other Name: DTIC
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Histological or cytological confirmation of advanced (inoperable stage III and stage IV) cutaneous or unknown primary melanoma
- Tumor sample confirmed as BRAF mutation positive
Exclusion Criteria:
- Diagnosis of uveal or mucosal melanoma
- Any prior Investigational therapy comprising inhibitors of Ras, Raf or MEK
- Having received an investigational drug within 30 days of starting treatment, or have not recovered from side effects of an investigational drug
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00936221
Show 38 Study Locations
Show 38 Study LocationsSponsors and Collaborators
AstraZeneca
Investigators
| Principal Investigator: | Mark Middleton, Dr | Churchil Hospital, Oxford, UK |
| Principal Investigator: | Caroline Robert, Dr | Institute Gustave Roussy, France |
| Study Director: | Ian Smith, Dr | AstraZeneca, Alderley Park, UK |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | AstraZeneca |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00936221 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | D1532C00006 |
| Study First Received: | July 8, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | March 19, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by AstraZeneca:
|
BRAF mutation positive advanced melanoma Advanced cutaneous melanoma Unknown primary melanoma |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Melanoma Neuroendocrine Tumors Neuroectodermal Tumors Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal Neoplasms by Histologic Type Neoplasms Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue Nevi and Melanomas |
Dacarbazine Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating Alkylating Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Pharmacologic Actions Antineoplastic Agents Therapeutic Uses |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013