Evaluation of Cipro Inhale in Patients With Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to find out if bacterial load in the airways can be reduced after inhalation of ciprofloxacin for 28 days.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Bronchiectasis |
Drug: Ciprofloxacin (Cipro, BAYQ3939) Drug: Placebo |
Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Double-blind, Multi-center Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of Ciprofloxacin Inhale Compared to Placebo in Patients With Non-cystic Fibrosis Bronchiectasis |
- Change From Baseline in Total Bacterial Load in the Sputum at End of Treatment (Day 29). [ Time Frame: Baseline and 29 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Total bacterial load was determined in sputum collected before the inhalation of study drug. Sputum samples were either provided by the participant during the respective study visit, or participants had to bring a sputum sample that had been produced within the 4 hours prior to the visit. Induced sputum samples could be collected if the participant was unable to produce a spontaneously expectorated sputum sample of > 2 mL. Imputation method: last observation carried forward (LOCF). CFU: colony forming units, log10: decadic logarithm
- Change From Baseline in Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 Second (FEV1) [ Time Frame: Baseline and up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Pulmonary function testing (spirometry) was conducted in accordance with American Thoracic Society standards. FEV1 was defined as the maximal volume of air exhaled in the first second of a forced expiration from a position of full inspiration, expressed in liters at body temperature and ambient pressure saturated with water vapor (BTPS). Imputation method: last observation carried forward (LOCF).
- Change From Baseline in Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) [ Time Frame: Baseline and up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Pulmonary function testing (spirometry) was conducted in accordance with American Thoracic Society standards. FVC was defined as the maximal volume of air exhaled with maximally forced effort from a maximal inspiration, i.e. vital capacity performed with a maximally forced expiratory effort expressed in liters at BTPS. Imputation method: last observation carried forward (LOCF).
- Time to Exacerbation With Antibiotic Intervention [ Time Frame: Up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Acute exacerbation was defined according to the joint American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society criteria. For detailed information with regard to this definition of acute exacerbation, please refer to the detailed description in the protocol section. The time to an acute exacerbation with antibiotic intervention was determined.
- Effect of Ciprofloxacin Inhale Treatment on Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) as Measured by the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), Total Score [ Time Frame: Up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Participants completed the Saint George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ). They were assured that all data would be treated confidentially and that the answers would not have any influence on study drug treatment. Participants completed the questionnaires on their own in a quiet area, without discussing them with study staff or accompanying persons (e.g. friends or relatives) and before being seen by the clinician. The score ranges from 0 to 100 with 100 being the worst possible score.
- Effect of Ciprofloxacin Inhale Treatment on Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) as Measured by Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire - Self Administered Standardized (CRQ-SAS) [ Time Frame: Up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Participants completed the Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire - Self Administered Standardized (CRQ-SAS). They were assured that all data would be treated confidentially and that the answers would not have any influence on study drug treatment. Participants completed the questionnaires on their own in a quiet area, without discussing them with study staff or accompanying persons (e.g. friends or relatives) and before being seen by the clinician. The score ranges between 1 and 7, 1 being the worst possible score.
- Change From Baseline in High Sensitive C-reactive Protein (hsCRP) [ Time Frame: Baseline and up to Day 42 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]High sensitive C-reactive protein (hsCRP) was determined from safety blood samples. Missing or invalid values were replaced with the last valid value available.
- Change From Baseline in Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) [ Time Frame: Baseline and up to Day 42 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) was determined from safety blood samples. Missing or invalid values were replaced with the last valid value available.
- 24-hour Sputum Volume [ Time Frame: Up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Participants were asked to start 24-hour sputum collection samples 24 hours before coming for the respective study visit. The volume of the completed sample was determined.
- 24-hour Sputum Color (Percentage of Participants With Non-clear Sputum) [ Time Frame: Up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Participants were asked to start 24-hour sputum collection samples 24 hours before coming for the respective study visit. Sputum color was assessed as either 'clear', or as 'yellow', 'green' or 'rust', or an assessment of 'no sputum' was made.
- Microbiological Response of Cipro Inhale Per Participant [ Time Frame: Up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Microbiological response was defined as reduction in bacterial load or eradication (measured as the percentage of participants with positive culture). Missing values were not imputed.
- Microbiological Response of Cipro Inhale Per Pathogen [ Time Frame: Up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Microbiological response was defined as reduction in bacterial load or eradication (measured as the number of participants with positive culture). Missing values were not imputed. Pathogens analyzed: Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Escherichia coli, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Proteus mirabilis, Serratia marcescens, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, mucoid, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, non mucoid, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Achromobacter xylosoxydans, Moraxella catarrhalis, Haemophilus influenzae
- Emergence of New Potential Respiratory Pathogens [ Time Frame: Up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The emergence of new potential respiratory pathogens was evaluated using microbiological analysis. Evaluated was the cumulative number of participants with first appearance of new potential respiratory antigens at each time point. In some cases, participants attended the end of study visit later than Day 84 (up to Day 88).
- Emergence of Resistance Among Baseline Pathogens [ Time Frame: Up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The emergence of resistance (at least two-fold increase of Minimal inhibitory concentration, MIC, vs. baseline values) probably or possibly related to study medication among baseline pathogens was evaluated using microbiological analysis.
- Change From Baseline in Total Bacterial Load in the Sputum [ Time Frame: Baseline and up to end of study (planned at Day 84) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Total bacterial load was determined in sputum collected before the inhalation of study drug. Sputum samples were either provided by the participant during the respective study visit, or participants had to bring a sputum sample that had been produced within the 4 hours prior to the visit. Induced sputum samples could be collected if the participant was unable to produce a spontaneously expectorated sputum sample of > 2 mL on Day 8. Imputation method: last observation carried forward (LOCF). CFU: colony forming units, log10: decadic logarithm
| Enrollment: | 124 |
| Study Start Date: | June 2009 |
| Study Completion Date: | September 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | September 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Ciprofloxacin Inhale (BAYQ3939)
32.5 mg ciprofloxacin hydrated corresponding to 50 mg Ciprofloxacin PulmoSphere Inhalation Powder twice daily
|
Drug: Ciprofloxacin (Cipro, BAYQ3939)
Inhalation of 32,5mg Ciprofloxacin inhaled twice a day
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Placebo
Inhalation of matching placebo twice a day
|
Drug: Placebo
Inhalation of matching placebo twice a day
|
Detailed Description:
Safety issues are addressed in the AE section. There is no standardised and unanimously accepted definition of exacerbation in COPD; 4 definitions are widely used: (1) using a combination of 3 cardinal symptoms: increased dyspnea, sputum volume, and sputum purulence; (2) looking at the presence of the following patterns of symptoms during >=2 consecutive days: either 2 or more of 3 major symptoms (increase in dyspnoea, sputum volume and sputum purulence); or any 1 major symptom together with any 1 minor symptom (increase in nasal discharge, wheeze, sore throat, cough or fever); (3) a sustained worsening of the patient's condition, from the stable state and beyond normal day-to-day variations, that is acute in onset and necessitates a change in regular medication in a patient with underlying COPD; (4) a complex of respiratory events (i.e. cough, wheezing, dyspnoea or sputum production) lasting >=3 days.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a proven and documented diagnosis of non-cystic fibrosis idiopathic or post pneumonic bronchiectasis
- Stable pulmonary status and stable regimen of standard treatment at least for the past 30 days
Exclusion Criteria:
- Forced Expiratory Volume 1 < 35% or > 80%
- Allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis
- Immunodeficiency disease requiring immunoglobulin replacement
- Inflammatory bowel disease
Contacts and Locations
Show 47 Study Locations| Study Director: | Bayer Study Director | Bayer |
More Information
Additional Information:
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Therapeutic Area Head, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00930982 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 12965, 2009-009869-34 |
| Study First Received: | June 30, 2009 |
| Results First Received: | September 19, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | April 14, 2013 |
| Health Authority: | Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices United States: Food and Drug Administration Spain: Agencia Espanola del Medicamento y Productos Sanitarios UK: Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency_MHRA0 Australia: Department of Health and Ageing, TGA/ Therapeutic Goods Administration Sweden: Medical Products Agency |
Keywords provided by Bayer:
|
Ciprofloxacin Airway infection Bronchiectasis |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Bronchiectasis Fibrosis Bronchial Diseases Respiratory Tract Diseases Pathologic Processes Ciprofloxacin |
Nucleic Acid Synthesis Inhibitors Enzyme Inhibitors Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Pharmacologic Actions Anti-Infective Agents Therapeutic Uses |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 21, 2013