A Study to Investigate the Ileo Neo Rectal Anastomosis Compared to the Ileo Pouch Anal Anastomosis for Patients With Ulcerative Colitis
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
For patients with ulcerative colitis, eligible for surgical treatment, which restorative surgical procedure: the standard ileo pouch anal anastomosis or the alternative ileo neo rectal anastomosis is the best in terms of complications, functional outcome and health status and quality of life.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Colitis, Ulcerative Surgery |
Procedure: Ileal Neo Rectal Anastomosis Procedure: Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Non-Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Historical Cohort Study, to Investigate Morbidity, Functional and Physiological Outcome, as Well as Endoscopic and Histological Aspects and the Quality of Life, of the Ileo Neo Rectal Anastomosis (INRA) Compared to the Ileo Pouch Anal Anastomosis (IPAA), for Patients With Ulcerative Colitis (UC) |
- functional outcome [ Time Frame: after surgery: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and yearly afterwards ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Quality of life and Health Status [ Time Frame: after surgery: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and yearly afterwards ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- histo-pathologic results [ Time Frame: after surgery: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and yearly afterwards ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- endoscopic results [ Time Frame: after surgery: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and yearly afterwards ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- morbidity and mortality [ Time Frame: after surgery: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and yearly afterwards ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- ano-rectal physiology [ Time Frame: after surgery: 3 months, 6 months, 12 months and yearly afterwards ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 100 |
| Study Start Date: | June 2005 |
| Study Completion Date: | July 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | December 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: INRA
Patients treated for medical refractory Ulcerative Colitis
|
Procedure: Ileal Neo Rectal Anastomosis
Comparison of the Ileal Neo Rectal Anastomosis to the Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis in patients treated for medical refractory Ulcerative Colitis
|
|
Active Comparator: IPAA
Patients treated for medical refractory Ulcerative Colitis
|
Procedure: Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis
Comparison of the Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis to the Ileal Neo Rectal Anastomosis in patients treated for medical refractory Ulcerative Colitis
|
Detailed Description:
This research is designed to answer questions from the medical profession and patients´ community (Crohn en Colitis Ulcerosa Society, the Netherlands) whether the new INRA technique needs further development on a broader scale or not.
The research project will be conducted in the two institutes where INRA procedures have been carried out and in the UMCN to recruit matched control IPAA patients. There is a large experience with the IPAA procedure in this latter institute. The University of Tilburg will participate to work on health status and quality of life aspects. They have a large experience with quality of life research in general and have participated in QOL research in this topic before.
The aim of this historical cohort study is to establish the value of INRA, compared to IPAA, for patients with ulcerative colitis.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 15 Years to 80 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- UC patients with INRA procedure
- Age, sex and disease specific matched group of UC-IPAA patients with temporary diverting ileostomy from the same period
- Written informed consent
Exclusion criteria
- Pregnancy
- Malignancy (apart from basalioma or carcinoma-in-situ of cervix)
- Psychiatric disease or inability to assess follow up
Contacts and Locations| Netherlands | |
| St Elisabeth Hospital | |
| Tilburg, Brabant, Netherlands, 5022 GC | |
| University Medical Centre St Radboud | |
| Nijmegen, Gelderland, Netherlands, 6500 HB | |
| Principal Investigator: | JT Heikens, MD | St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands |
| Study Chair: | D de Jong, MD, PhD | University Medical Centre St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands |
| Study Chair: | JLJM Teepen, MD, PhD | St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands |
| Study Chair: | JHJM van Krieken, MD, PhD | University Medical Centre St Radboud, The Netherlands |
| Study Chair: | HG Gooszen, MD, PhD | University Medical Centre St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands |
| Study Chair: | J de Vries, Md, PhD | St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands |
| Study Director: | CJHM van Laarhoven, MD, PhD | University Medical Centre St Radboud, The Netherlands |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | JT Heikens, MD, St Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, The Netherlands |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00922103 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 0426, AMO nr. 04/074 |
| Study First Received: | June 12, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | September 10, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | Netherlands: Medical Ethics Review Committee (METC) Netherlands: The Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO) |
Keywords provided by St. Elisabeth Hospital, Tilburg, Netherlands:
|
Colitis, Ulcerative Ileo Neo Rectal Anastomosis Ileal Pouch Anal Anastomosis Quality of Life |
functional results reconstructive surgery surgery |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Colitis Colitis, Ulcerative Ulcer Gastroenteritis Gastrointestinal Diseases |
Digestive System Diseases Colonic Diseases Intestinal Diseases Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Pathologic Processes |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013