Pain and Fatigue Management in Patients With Breast Cancer, Prostate Cancer, Colon Cancer, or Lung Cancer

• Quality of life [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  
• Pain knowledge of patients and professionals [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  
• Fatigue knowledge of patients and professionals [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  
• Adherence to algorithm by patients, professionals, and system [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  
• Satisfaction of patients and professionals [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  

OBJECTIVES:

• To test the effects of the Passport to Comfort (Passport) intervention at 1 and 3 months post-intervention by comparing baseline data to the high-intensity intervention.
• To test the effects of select demographic and disease/treatment variables on outcomes of the Passport model at 1 and 3 months post-intervention compared to pre-intervention.
• To examine perceived patient and professional satisfaction with the Passport model.
• To test the effects of the Passport intervention by comparing high-intensity to low-intensity.

OUTLINE: Patients are stratified according to cancer diagnosis (breast vs prostate vs colon vs lung), pain level (< 4 vs ≥ 4 on pain scale), and fatigue level (< 4 vs ≥ 4 on fatigue scale). Patients are assigned to 1 of 3 groups.

• Group 1 (enrolled during months 1-8): Patients undergo pain and fatigue assessment periodically by demographic and treatment data, Quality of life-Patient Tool, BQII, Piper Fatigue Scale, Pain and Fatigue Knowledge Tools, and Patient Satisfaction Tool. Patients receive usual care and undergo pain and fatigue evaluation with no algorithms or formal education. Research nurses conduct chart audits to identify professional and system barriers but receive no medical education, peer review, or feedback. Medical professionals undergo assessment periodically by a Demographic Data Tool, Pain and Fatigue Knowledge Tools, Chart Audit Tool, and Provider Satisfaction.
• Group 2 (enrolled during months 9-30): Patients and medical professionals are assessed periodically as in group 1. Patients undergo a high-intensity Passport intervention with algorithms based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines, pain and fatigue education once weekly for 4 weeks, and follow-up reinforcement phone calls every 2 weeks. Research nurses conduct chart audits of congruence between practice and guidelines, tape education sessions, and receive feedback from the principal investigator in the form of a Tape-Monitoring Checklist. Medical oncologists attend training on the use of the algorithms, peer review pain and fatigue management audit with feedback, and reinforce and apply content in clinical rounds.
• Group 3 (enrolled during months 34-57): Patients and medical professionals are assessed periodically as in group 1. Patients undergo a low-intensity Passport intervention as in group 2. Medical professionals conduct realistic implementation of the intervention into existing systems and procedures within the cancer center, less direct education and system intervention, and share group 2 experiences.

After completion of study intervention, patients are followed at 1 and 3 months.