High Cut-Off Continuous Veno-venous Hemodialysis (CVVHD) in Patients Treated for Acute Renal Failure After Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS)/Septic Shock (HICOSS)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This study will assess the influence of the High Cut-Off (HCO) CVVHD treatment on the disease progression in septic patients. The primary aim of the study is to evaluate whether HCO CVVHD leads to a significant improvement of the hemodynamic status (mean arterial pressure, vasopressor requirements) in septic patients in comparison to CVVHD treatment with conventional high-flux filters. For the HCO-group the investigators expect a 50% lower dosage of vasopressors needed to maintain an adequate organ perfusion.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Kidney Failure, Acute |
Device: continuous venovenous hemodialysis |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | High Cut-off Continuous Venovenous Hemodialysis (CVVHD) to Improve Hemodynamic Stability and Organ Function Scores in Patients Treated for Acute Renal Failure After Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS)/Septic Shock |
- Dosage of vasopressors [ Time Frame: day 1 to day 5 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Mean arterial pressure [ Time Frame: day before inclusion and day 1 to day 5 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Heart rate [ Time Frame: day before inclusion and day 1 to day 5 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Central venous pressure [ Time Frame: day before inclusion and day 1 to day 5 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score [ Time Frame: at ICU admission, at inclusion and day 1 to day 5 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Survival [ Time Frame: 28 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Length of need for catecholamine application [ Time Frame: 28 days follow up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Length of need for mechanical ventilation [ Time Frame: 28 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Length of need for renal replacement therapy [ Time Frame: 28 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Length of stay in intensive care unit (ICU) [ Time Frame: 28 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 120 |
| Study Start Date: | February 2004 |
| Study Completion Date: | June 2009 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | June 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: HCO
High cut-off filters HCO1100
|
Device: continuous venovenous hemodialysis
dialysate flow rate 35 ml/h/kg. Blood flow rate should be aimed at 200 ml/min, but not less than 150 ml/min. Bicarbonate- or lactate-buffered solutions will be used as dialysis fluids. Study dialyzers will be changed routinely every 24 h or earlier if the filter is obstructed by clotting.
Other Name: continuous venovenous hemodialysis
|
|
Active Comparator: control
conventional high-flux filters
|
Device: continuous venovenous hemodialysis
dialysate flow rate 35 ml/h/kg. Blood flow rate should be aimed at 200 ml/min, but not less than 150 ml/min. Bicarbonate- or lactate-buffered solutions will be used as dialysis fluids. Study dialyzers will be changed routinely every 24 h or earlier if the filter is obstructed by clotting.
Other Name: continuous venovenous hemodialysis
|
Detailed Description:
Severe sepsis is a devastating disorder that results from a complex host response to insult after infection. Despite advances in intensive care technologies sepsis remains an important and life-threatening problem. Sepsis is the most common cause of death in the intensive care unit.
Local or systemic release of bacteria-derived compounds, leading to the production of proinflammatory cytokines, induce systemic inflammatory reactions in septic patients. Continuous renal replacement therapies (CRRT) such as hemodialysis (CVVHD), hemofiltration (CVVH) or hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF) with conventional high-flux membranes allow to control fluid and electrolyte balance, and to improve the hemodynamic status of the patients. However, conventional high flux membranes have a limited permeability for sepsis-associated mediators with molecular weights in the range of 15.000 to 60.000 Da.
A promising approach to enhance the mediator removal is to use membranes having larger pores and permeability characteristics than those currently used in CRRT.
For that purpose a High Cut-Off (HCO) membrane has been developed and is manufactured by Gambro Research.After demonstrating the safety as well as the cytokine removal effectiveness in a clinical pilot study this study will assess the influence of the HCO treatment on the disease progression in septic patients.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Fulfilling at least two of the SIRS criteria as defined by the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP)/Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) Consensus Conference
- Having signs of renal dysfunction
- Requirement for catecholamine administration (norepinephrine or others)
- Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE II) score at enrolment greater than or equal to 19 and less than or equal to 30
Exclusion Criteria:
- Lack of written informed consent from patients or a legally authorized surrogate
- Duration of septic shock greater than 4 days
- Hypoproteinemia (characterized by serum albumin less than 18 g/l)
- End stage renal failure
- Known active malignancy
- Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection
- Age younger than 18 years or older than 80 years
- Known pregnancy
- Immunosuppression after transplantation
- Participation in another clinical study
- Renal replacement therapy greater than 24 hours before randomization
Contacts and Locations| Austria | |
| Leopold Franzens Universität Innsbruck | |
| Innsbruck, Austria, 6020 | |
| Germany | |
| Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Nephrologie Charite, Campus Mitte | |
| Berlin, Germany, 10117 | |
| Charité-Virchow Klinik | |
| Berlin, Germany, 13353 | |
| Universitätsklinikum Tübingen | |
| Tübingen, Germany, 72076 | |
| Study Director: | Werner Beck, Dr. | Gambro Dialysatoren GmbH |
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Werner Beck, Gambro Dialysatoren GmbH |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00875888 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 0000050, ISRCTN77656437 |
| Study First Received: | January 9, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | January 26, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices Austria: Agency for Health and Food Safety |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Acute Kidney Injury Renal Insufficiency Shock, Septic Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome Kidney Diseases Urologic Diseases |
Sepsis Infection Inflammation Pathologic Processes Shock |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013