Atrial Fibrillation: Canadian Atrial Fibrillation Evaluation (CAFE) Study -
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Guidant Corporation
Information provided by:
Guidant Corporation
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00848445
First received: February 19, 2009
Last updated: NA
Last verified: February 2009
History: No changes posted
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
To evaluate whether atrial fibrillation (AF) therapies in Guidant Pulsar Max II or Insignia Plus DR have an effect on the occurance of AF in patients with no prior history of AF
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Atrial Fibrillation |
Device: Guidant Pulsar Max II or Insignia Plus DR Device: Atrial pacing preference turned on or off |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Prevention |
| Official Title: | the Use of Atrial Fibrillation Pacing Therapies in Patients With no Previous History of Atrial Fibrillation: Canadian Atrial Fibrillation Evaluation (CAFE) Study - |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Genetics Home Reference related topics:
familial atrial fibrillation
MedlinePlus related topics:
Atrial Fibrillation
U.S. FDA Resources
Further study details as provided by Guidant Corporation:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- To compare the occurrence of AF (>350 bpm) during a period when AF pacing therapies are programmed on (APP and VRR) and during when AF therapies are programmed off. [ Time Frame: one year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- To compare AF burden between patients with AF therapies programmed on (APP and VRR) and patients with AF pacing therapies turned off (APP and VRR). Burden is defined as the product of the number of AF events and duration of events. To compare the time to [ Time Frame: one year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 270 |
| Study Start Date: | October 2002 |
| Study Completion Date: | November 2007 |
| Primary Completion Date: | November 2007 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: APP and VRR on
APP and VRR turned on at 2 week visit
|
Device: Guidant Pulsar Max II or Insignia Plus DR
market approved pacemaker. programmed per protocol
Device: Atrial pacing preference turned on or off
programing changes in the device
|
|
Active Comparator: APP and VRR off
APP and VRR turned off
|
Device: Guidant Pulsar Max II or Insignia Plus DR
market approved pacemaker. programmed per protocol
Device: Atrial pacing preference turned on or off
programing changes in the device
|
Detailed Description:
This multi-centre, randomized, cross-over, prospective study will evaluate the occurrence of AF with AF pacing therapies programmed on (APP and VRR) and with AF therapies programmed off (APP and VRR) in patients with no known prior history of AF (all patients have a pacing indication). The occurrence of AF as well as time to first event and AF burden (frequecy and duration).
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- No prior history of AF or atrial flutter, primary indication of SSS or AV block for dual chamber pacemaker, confidentiality agreement signed and dated before implant, available for follow-up at the study centre where they were enrolled at the protocol defined intervals, willing and capable of participating in all testing associated with the study, on stable regime of arrhythmia management drugs.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Documented history of AF or atrial flutter, clinically significant ventricular arrhythmias, < 18 yrs old, life expectancy < 1 year or expectation of heart transplantation during the study period, likely to or have received a mechanical tricuspid valve during the study, enrolled in other cardiovascular studies, women who are pregnant, inability or refusal to sign Patient Confidentiality Agreement, inability or refusal to complete the follow-up schedule at the study centre in which they were enrolled, exhibit arrhythmias due to reversible cause eg, digitalis toxicity, hypoxia, transient electrolyte imbalance, acute myocardial infarction or electrocution.
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Dr Lawrence Sterns (PI), Victoria Cardiac Arrythmia Trials |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00848445 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | CAFÉ |
| Study First Received: | February 19, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | February 19, 2009 |
| Health Authority: | Canada: Health Canada |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Atrial Fibrillation Arrhythmias, Cardiac Heart Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Pathologic Processes |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013