Exploring New Approaches in Reaching Behavior Post Stroke

This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Information provided by:
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00844870
First received: February 13, 2009
Last updated: NA
Last verified: February 2009
History: No changes posted
  Purpose

After 4 weeks of training the hypothesis that the more natural training program would yield greater functional changes was proven correct.


Condition Intervention
Stroke
Behavioral: stabilization training
Behavioral: auditory training group

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Training With or Without Upper Body Restraint During Reaching in Individuals Post Stroke

Further study details as provided by University of the Sciences in Philadelphia:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • WMFT [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • FM and shoulder flexion [ Time Frame: 1 year ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Enrollment: 24
Study Start Date: April 2007
Study Completion Date: September 2008
Primary Completion Date: August 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Active Comparator: 1
stabilization training group
Behavioral: stabilization training
training of arm function with the trunk stabilized
Experimental: 2
auditory response training group
Behavioral: auditory training group
response to an auditory signal

Detailed Description:

Analysis indicated that both methods improved reaching without trunk use Reaching performance scale (RPS), but the trunk -stabilized group led to more significant changes. Training under less restrictive conditions associated with Task-Related Training (TRT) (auditory feedback from trunk sensor) as compared to stabilized TRT, led to improved functional and impairment measure scores (WMFT, FM and shoulder flexion). Conclusion: Fading feedback with both training methods, during extended TRT reaching/grasping practice generally led to some improvements. However, as demonstrated by impairment and functional outcome measures, using TRT with an auditory feedback signals is a more effective approach than forcing the stabilization of the trunk during rehabilitation of the upper-limb.

  Eligibility

Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   Yes
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals all scored between 20 and 44 on the Upper-Arm subsection of the Fugl-Meyer Scale (FM- Poole & Whitney, 1988) and demonstrated some trunk movement during the pretest reaching performance scale measures (RPS, Levin 2006)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Individuals were referred if they had no receptive aphasia, apraxia or other cognitive deficits.
  Contacts and Locations
Choosing to participate in a study is an important personal decision. Talk with your doctor and family members or friends about deciding to join a study. To learn more about this study, you or your doctor may contact the study research staff using the Contacts provided below. For general information, see Learn About Clinical Studies.

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00844870

Sponsors and Collaborators
University of the Sciences in Philadelphia
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Gregory T Thielman, Ed.D University of the Sciences in Philadelphia
  More Information

No publications provided

Responsible Party: Gregory Thielman, University of The Sciences in Philadelphia
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00844870     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 06-007
Study First Received: February 13, 2009
Last Updated: February 13, 2009
Health Authority: United States: Institutional Review Board

Keywords provided by University of the Sciences in Philadelphia:
rehabilitation, reaching, stroke

Additional relevant MeSH terms:
Stroke
Cerebral Infarction
Cerebrovascular Disorders
Brain Diseases
Central Nervous System Diseases
Nervous System Diseases
Vascular Diseases
Cardiovascular Diseases
Brain Infarction
Brain Ischemia

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on October 01, 2014