Comparing Efficacy Between Anti-microtubule and Non-anti-microtubule as 3th Therapy After 2nd Line EGFR-TKI Therapy
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This is an observational prospective study that investigates only daily practice. The prescription of anti-cancer medicine is separated from the decision to include the patient in this study. In addition, the assignment of the patient to a particular therapy or therapeutic strategy is not decided in advance by this study protocol, but falls within current practice.
The patient who fulfils eligible criteria will be enrolled when starts to receive the second-line EGFR-TKI therapy. The frequency of tumor response evaluation by RECIST criteria follows the investigator's discretion as daily practice.
| Condition |
|---|
|
Cancer |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Time Perspective: Prospective |
| Official Title: | Comparing Efficacy Between Anti-microtubule and Non-anti-microtubule as 3th Therapy After 2nd Line EGFR-TKI Therapy |
- PFS of the third-line therapy [ Time Frame: 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Overall objective tumor response (complete response [CR] + partial response [PR]) of the third-line therapy by RECIST criteria [ Time Frame: 9 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 36 |
| Study Start Date: | August 2009 |
| Study Completion Date: | September 2012 |
| Primary Completion Date: | September 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Groups/Cohorts |
|---|
| 1 |
| 2 |
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 20 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Probability Sample |
The EGFR-TKI receiver who are suitable for third-line therapy will be followed up for the regimen of the third-line anti-microtubule agents or non-anti-microtubule agents
Inclusion Criteria:
- At least one measurable lesion according to RECIST criteria
- Histologically or cytologically confirmed NSCLC of adeno histology
- Locally progressed or metastasized on or after first-line chemotherapy. The imaging evidence of disease progression can be either chest X ray, CT or MRI assessment on measurable lesions. If no measurable lesion is available, evaluable lesions are acce
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | AstraZeneca |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00836160 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | NIS-OTW-DUM-2008/1 |
| Study First Received: | February 3, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | September 19, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | Taiwan: Institutional Review Board Taiwan: Department of Health |
Keywords provided by AstraZeneca:
|
EGFR-TKI therapy NSCLC Efficacy |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013