Full Text View
Tabular View
No Study Results Posted
Related Studies
Pilot Study Comparing Two Vacuum-wound-dressings for the Treatment of Open Abdomen (ABDOVAC)
The recruitment status of this study is unknown because the information has not been verified recently.
Verified October 2009 by University Hospital Mannheim.   Recruitment status was  Not yet recruiting

First Received on February 2, 2009.   Last Updated on December 24, 2009   History of Changes
Sponsor: University Hospital Mannheim
Collaborator: German Research Foundation
Information provided by: University Hospital Mannheim
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00834314
  Purpose

The primary purpose of the study is to determine whether two vacuum-wound-dressing techniques (the so called "abdominal dressing" versus "vacuum-pack-technique") are equally effective in the treatment of open abdomen.

Secondary purpose is the comparison of feasibility and economic aspects.


Condition Intervention
Open Abdomen
Temporary Abdominal Closure
Procedure: Vacuum-Pack-technique for temporary abdominal closure
Procedure: Abdominal-dressing-technique for temporary abdominal closure

Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Open Label
Primary Purpose: Treatment
Official Title: Pilot Study Comparing Two Negative-pressure Wound Dressing Systems for the Treatment of Open Abdomen: "Vacuum-pack" Versus "Abdominal Dressing"

Resource links provided by NLM:


Further study details as provided by University Hospital Mannheim:

Primary Outcome Measures:
  • Failure of delayed abdominal fascial closure (non-prevented ventral hernia) and/or in-hospital-death of any cause (combined primary outcome) [ Time Frame: until end of vacuum-therapy or death ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Secondary Outcome Measures:
  • vacuum-therapy-related morbidity/complications [ Time Frame: until hospital dismissal or death ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
  • length of vacuum-therapy [ Time Frame: until end of vacuum-therapy or death ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • costs of vacuum-therapy [ Time Frame: until end of vacuum-therapy or death ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • total length of ICU-stay [ Time Frame: until end of ICU-therapy or death ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • post-dismissal health-related quality of life (SF36 and EQ-5D questionnaire) [ Time Frame: 12 weeks after hospital dismissal ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  • recurrent hernia/abdominal wall dehiscence after initial facial closure during hospital stay [ Time Frame: 12 weeks post hospital dismissal ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]

Estimated Enrollment: 20
Study Start Date: October 2009
Estimated Study Completion Date: December 2010
Estimated Primary Completion Date: September 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)
Arms Assigned Interventions
Experimental: Vacuum-pack
see Interventions
Procedure: Vacuum-Pack-technique for temporary abdominal closure
Negative-pressure-wound-therapy applying a method described by Brock, Barker et al 1995: "Temporary Closure of Open Abdominal Wounds - the Vacuum Pack" (see citations).
Active Comparator: Abdominal dressing
see Interventions
Procedure: Abdominal-dressing-technique for temporary abdominal closure
Negative-pressure-wound-therapy for temporary abdominal closure applying a device of KCI International (V.A.C.® Abdominal Dressing System). see: http://www.kci-medical.com/kci/corporate/kcitherapies/vactherapy/dressings/abdominal/#
Other Name: V.A.C.® Abdominal Dressing System

  Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:   18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:   Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:   No
Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients indicated for open-abdomen-treatment by responsible consultant surgeon where vacuum-technique is judged technically possible

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Technical reasons
  • unjustified risk-benefit-ratio of manipulations necessary for application of vacuum-pack-technique or abdominal-dressing-technique
  Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00834314

Contacts
Contact: Florian Herrle, MD 0049-621- ext 2357 florian.herrle@umm.de
Contact: Jens-Olaf Jonescheit, MD 0049-621- ext 2357 jens-olaf.jonescheit@umm.de

Sponsors and Collaborators
University Hospital Mannheim
German Research Foundation
Investigators
Principal Investigator: Stefan Post, Prof. Dr. University Medical Center Mannheim, Germany, Surgical Department
  More Information

Additional Information:
Publications:
Responsible Party: Prof. Dr. Stefan Post, Director Surgical Department, University Medical Center Mannheim
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00834314     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 2008-291 M-MA
Study First Received: February 2, 2009
Last Updated: December 24, 2009
Health Authority: Germany: Ethics Commission

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on February 09, 2012