Study to Evaluate Safety, Efficacy and Tolerability of Clobetasol Propionate for Chronic Hand Dermatitis
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of the study is to assess the safety, efficacy and tolerability of Clobetasol propionate foam in subjects with chronic dermatitis.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Hand Dermatosis |
Drug: clobetasol propionate |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | An Open Label Study to Evaluate Safety, Efficacy and Tolerability of Clobetasol Propionate for the Condition of Chronic Hand Dermatitis |
- Proportion of Subjects With at Least 1-grade Improvement From Baseline to Day 15 in Investigator's Static Global Assessment Score (ISGA) Score [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 15 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Proportion of Subjects with at least a 1-Grade Improvement from Baseline to Day 15 In Investigator's Static Global Assessment Score (ISGA) - Chronic Hand Dermatitis Please note that the proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.
ISGA grades:
Score = 0 (Clear) Score = 1 (Almost Clear) Score = 2 (Mild) Score = 3 (Moderate) Score = 4 (Severe)
- Proportion of Subjects Who Achieve at Least a 1-grade Improvement Based on the ISGA at Day 8. [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 8 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Please note that the proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.
Investigator's Static Global Assessment Score (ISGA) At least 1-grade improvement (%) at Day 8
ISGA grades:
Score = 0 (Clear) Score = 1 (Almost Clear) Score = 2 (Mild) Score = 3 (Moderate) Score = 4 (Severe)
- Change in Subject's Visual Analogue Assessment Scale [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 8 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Mean change in subject's visual analogue assessment scale from baseline to day 8. At each visit, the subject is requested to rate the changes in their skin on the hands on a 1 to 10 scale with 0 being poor and 10 being excellent.
- Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Finger Tips [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 15 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Proportion of subjects at day 15 with at least 1-Grade improvement in the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for all symptoms present at baseline - Finger Tips. The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.
Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.
- Proportion of Subjects at Day 8 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Finger Tips [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 8 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Proportion of Subjects at day 8 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Finger Tips
The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.
Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.
- Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline - Fingers [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 15 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Proportion of Subjects at day 15 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Fingers.
The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.
Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.
- Proportion of Subjects With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Fingers [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 8 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Proportion of Subjects at day 8 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline - Fingers
The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.
Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.
- Proportion of Subjects at Day 8 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Palm of Hands [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 8 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Proportion of Subjects at Day 8 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline - Palm of Hands.
The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.
Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.
- Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Palm of Hands [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 15 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 with at least a 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Palm of Hands The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.
Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.
- Proportion of Subjects at Day 8 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Back of Hands [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 8 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Proportion of Subjects at Day 8 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Back of Hands.
The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.
Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.
- Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Back of Hands [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 15 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Back of Hands.
The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.
Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.
- Proportion of Subjects at Day 8 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Wrists [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 8 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Proportion of Subjects at Day 8 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Wrists.
The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.
Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.
- Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 With at Least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI) for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Wrists [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 15 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Proportion of Subjects at Day 15 with at least 1-Grade Improvement In the Hand Eczema Severity Index Score (HESI)for All Symptoms Present at Baseline Wrists.
The proportion of participants is being reported as a percentage of participants.
Each hand was divided into five areas [fingertips, fingers (except the tips), palms, back of hands and wrists]. For each of these areas the intensity of the 6 following clinical signs: erythema, induration, papulation, vesicles, fissuring, scaling and oedema was graded as follows: 0, no skin changes; 1, mild disease; 2, moderate and 3, severe.
- Change in Subject's Visual Analogue Assessment Scale From Baseline to Day 15 [ Time Frame: Baseline, Day 15 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Mean change in subject's visual analogue assessment scale from baseline to day 15. At each visit, the subject is requested to rate the changes in their skin on the hands on a 1 to 10 scale with 0 being poor and 10 being excellent.
| Enrollment: | 30 |
| Study Start Date: | October 2008 |
| Study Completion Date: | January 2009 |
| Primary Completion Date: | January 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: clobetasol propionate foam
All subjects receive clobetasol propionate
|
Drug: clobetasol propionate
Clobetasol propionate. The study product will be applied topically twice a day (morning and evening) for 14 days of treatment.
|
Detailed Description:
The study is being conducted in order to obtain safety, efficacy and tolerability data for Clobetasol propionate foam in the treatment of chronic dermatitis. The subjects must have mild to moderate disease based on the Investigator's assessment at baseline.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects 18 years of age or older, with diagnosis of chronic dermatitis, able to complete the study and comply with study instructions.
- Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test. Sexually active women of childbearing potential participating in the study must have been using a medically acceptable form of contraception
Exclusion Criteria:
- Use of systemic corticosteroid and/or other prohibited medications within 4 weeks of the baseline visit.
- Use of topical corticosteroid therapy and/or other prohibited topical medications within 2 weeks prior to the baseline visit
Contacts and Locations| United States, Kentucky | |
| Physicians Skin Care | |
| Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40217 | |
| Study Director: | GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline |
More Information
No publications provided by GlaxoSmithKline
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | GlaxoSmithKline ( Stiefel, a GSK Company ) |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00828464 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | U0280-401 |
| Study First Received: | January 22, 2009 |
| Results First Received: | April 7, 2010 |
| Last Updated: | September 21, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by GlaxoSmithKline:
|
Dermatosis, Dermatitis, Dry skin, Irritated skin |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Dermatitis Hand Dermatoses Skin Diseases Clobetasol Anti-Inflammatory Agents Therapeutic Uses |
Pharmacologic Actions Glucocorticoids Hormones Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists Physiological Effects of Drugs |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013