A Trial of Adjuvant Transarterial Chemoembolization (TACE) for Preventing Tumor Recurrence After Liver Resection
Recruitment status was Active, not recruiting
The aim of this study is to analyze the therapeutic effect of adjuvant TACE after resection.Patients receiving curative resection (R0) were randomized to postoperative TACE group and no TACE group. The time to recurrence ,the overall survival as well as the incidence of complications after therapy was observed to confirm the role of adjuvant TACE.
|Study Design:||Allocation: Randomized
Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study
Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment
Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor)
Primary Purpose: Prevention
|Official Title:||Eastern Hepatobilliary Surgical Hospital|
- Overall survival [ Time Frame: 2010 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Time to recurrence [ Time Frame: 2010 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
|Study Start Date:||January 2009|
|Estimated Study Completion Date:||December 2010|
|Estimated Primary Completion Date:||December 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)|
No Intervention: no adjuvant TACE
controll group with patients who don't receive any adjuvant therapy after liver resection, to compare with the treatment group with patients who receive adjuvant TACE after liver resection
Experimental: adjuvant TACE
patients who adjuvant TACE after liver resection
Drug: epirubicin and lipiodol
using the technology of Seldinger,The drugs (30 mg epirubicin mixed with 5 ml lipiodol) are given via hepatica propria artery.
Other Name: transarterial chemoembolization
Although resection of hepatocellular carcinoma is potentially curative, local recurrence is common with the recurrence rate higher than 50% during 5 years. So to reduce the recurrence rate of HCC, some interventions had been tried in clinic, including transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), immunotherapy, and interferon treatment etc. But few of these adjuvant therapies had been proved effective and their long term efficacy and clinical application remained further explored.
TACE had been prove to be effective in patients with advanced stage of HCC in randomized controlled trials and meta-analysis, but the role of adjuvant TACE after liver resection is controversial. The results getting from different randomized control trials varied significantly because of the bias of patient selection, different study design，the small size of sample, different drug used in chemotherapy and lack of proper stratification…,so a big sample size, well patients selected and well designed randomized controlled trial is needed to further confirm the role of the postoperative TACE.
Patients with HCC who received curative liver resection (R0) were randomly assigned 1:1 by the doctors to receive no adjuvant TACE(control group) or TACE(treatment group). All patients in the treatment group received adjuvant TACE 45 days after liver resection. The outcomes of patients were evaluated during the 3-years follow up.
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00820053
|Eastern hepatobilliary surgery hospital|
|Shanghai, Shanghai, China, 200438|
|Study Chair:||Shen feng, MD||Eastern hepatobilliary surgery hospital|