ED Residents MBP During CVC Placement: Sim Lab Based Training (EM CVC MBP)

This study has been completed.

Sponsor:

Information provided by (Responsible Party):

Hassan Khouli, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:

NCT00791583

First received: November 12, 2008

Last updated: August 22, 2012

Last verified: August 2012

History of Changes

Purpose

Baseline performance in maximal barrier precaution technique of Emergency Medicine (EM) residents, certified in CVC placement, is poor
Simulation-based training in maximal barrier precaution technique during central venous catheter (CVC) placement will improve baseline performance of EM residents

Condition
Nosocomial Infections

Study Type:	Observational
Study Design:	Observational Model: Cohort Time Perspective: Prospective
Official Title:	Emergency Medicine Residents Performance in Maximum Barrier Precautions During Central Venous Catheter Placement: Effect of Stimulation-based Training

Further study details as provided by St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center:

Primary Outcome Measures:

Primary outcome: Emergency Medicine residents' performance in maximal barrier precaution (MBP) technique during central venous catheter (CVC) placement [ Time Frame: 6 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]

Enrollment:	76
Study Start Date:	May 2008
Study Completion Date:	August 2012
Primary Completion Date:	November 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure)

Show Detailed Description

Eligibility

Ages Eligible for Study:	18 Years and older
Genders Eligible for Study:	Both
Accepts Healthy Volunteers:	Yes
Sampling Method:	Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Emergency Medicine Residents

Criteria

Inclusion Criteria:

Emergency Medicine (EM) residents who are eligible by their residency training program to place a CVC and will be undergoing evaluation and training in MBP according to their department training policy.

Exclusion Criteria:

Residents who refuse to have their data collected for the sake of this study and later analyzed for publication

Contacts and Locations

Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00791583

Locations

United States, New York
St. Luke's Roosevelt Hospital
New York, New York, United States, 10019

Sponsors and Collaborators

St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center

More Information

Publications:

McGee DC, Gould MK. Preventing complications of central venous catheterization. N Engl J Med. 2003 Mar 20;348(12):1123-33. Review. No abstract available.

Eggimann P. Prevention of intravascular catheter infection. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2007 Aug;20(4):360-9. Review.

Posa PJ, Harrison D, Vollman KM. Elimination of central line-associated bloodstream infections: application of the evidence. AACN Adv Crit Care. 2006 Oct-Dec;17(4):446-54; quiz 456. Review.

Shannon RP, Patel B, Cummins D, Shannon AH, Ganguli G, Lu Y. Economics of central line--associated bloodstream infections. Am J Med Qual. 2006 Nov-Dec;21(6 Suppl):7S-16S.

Bull DA, Neumayer LA, Hunter GC, Sethi GK, McIntyre KE, Bernhard VM, Putnam CW. Improved sterile technique diminishes the incidence of positive line cultures in cardiovascular patients. J Surg Res. 1992 Feb;52(2):106-10.

Guzzo JL, Seagull FJ, Bochicchio GV, Sisley A, Mackenzie CF, Dutton RP, Scalea T, Xiao Y. Mentors decrease compliance with best sterile practices during central venous catheter placement in the trauma resuscitation unit. Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2006 Feb;7(1):15-20.

Xiao Y, Seagull FJ, Bochicchio GV, Guzzo JL, Dutton RP, Sisley A, Joshi M, Standiford HC, Hebden JN, Mackenzie CF, Scalea TM. Video-based training increases sterile-technique compliance during central venous catheter insertion. Crit Care Med. 2007 May;35(5):1302-6.

Wayne DB, Siddall VJ, Butter J, Fudala MJ, Wade LD, Feinglass J, McGaghie WC. A longitudinal study of internal medicine residents' retention of advanced cardiac life support skills. Acad Med. 2006 Oct;81(10 Suppl):S9-S12.

Mayo PH, Hackney JE, Mueck JT, Ribaudo V, Schneider RF. Achieving house staff competence in emergency airway management: results of a teaching program using a computerized patient simulator. Crit Care Med. 2004 Dec;32(12):2422-7.

Murray D. Clinical simulation: measuring the efficacy of training. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2005 Dec;18(6):645-8.

Savoldelli GL, Naik VN, Park J, Joo HS, Chow R, Hamstra SJ. Value of debriefing during simulated crisis management: oral versus video-assisted oral feedback. Anesthesiology. 2006 Aug;105(2):279-85.

Bond WF, Lammers RL, Spillane LL, Smith-Coggins R, Fernandez R, Reznek MA, Vozenilek JA, Gordon JA; Society for Academic Emergency Medicine Simulation Task Force. The use of simulation in emergency medicine: a research agenda. Acad Emerg Med. 2007 Apr;14(4):353-63. Epub 2007 Feb 15.

Pronovost P, Needham D, Berenholtz S, Sinopoli D, Chu H, Cosgrove S, Sexton B, Hyzy R, Welsh R, Roth G, Bander J, Kepros J, Goeschel C. An intervention to decrease catheter-related bloodstream infections in the ICU. N Engl J Med. 2006 Dec 28;355(26):2725-32. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2007 Jun 21;356(25):2660.

Responsible Party:	Hassan Khouli, MD, St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:	NCT00791583 History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers:	08-007
Study First Received:	November 12, 2008
Last Updated:	August 22, 2012
Health Authority:	United States: Institutional Review Board

Keywords provided by St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center:

Emergency Medicine (EM)
Central Venous Catheter (CVC)
Maximal Barrier Precaution (MBP)
Precaution Technique during Central Venous Cathether Placement

Additional relevant MeSH terms:

Cross Infection
Infection

ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013

To Top