Optimisation of Monitoring for Clinical Research Studies (OPTIMON)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
OPTIMON will compare the efficacy and the cost of two monitoring strategies: one based on the classic standards of quality assurance, and the other one being a priori "optimized" on the main scientific and regulatory principles.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Healthy |
Other: classical monitoring strategy Other: optimized monitoring strategy |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Observational Model: Case Control Time Perspective: Prospective |
| Official Title: | Evaluation of Efficacy and Cost of Two Monitoring Strategies for Public Clinical Research - OPTIMON: Optimisation of Monitoring for Clinical Research Studies |
- Proportion of patients' file without severe error. [ Time Frame: at end of follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Compounds of the main outcome, other errors, delay to get the results, costs [ Time Frame: at end of follow-up ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 1800 |
| Study Start Date: | May 2008 |
| Study Completion Date: | June 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | June 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Groups/Cohorts | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
1
classical monitoring strategy
|
Other: classical monitoring strategy
intensive on-site monitoring, consistently with the pharmaceutical industry practices
|
|
2
optimized monitoring strategy
|
Other: optimized monitoring strategy
optimized on-site monitoring, depending on patient's risk
|
Detailed Description:
There is no validated standard of monitoring strategy for clinical research studies. Optimon will compare two monitoring strategies - a classical strategy based on the practices of the pharmaceutical industry, and an optimized strategy based on patient's risk level - on their ability to produce exact data, focusing on the main quality criteria: regulatory requirements and scientific validity of results. Optimon is a non inferiority randomized trial.
Eligibility| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
| Sampling Method: | Probability Sample |
All type of patients enrolled in the eligible studies
Inclusion Criteria:
- Clinical Research Studies: risk level A, B, or C in the Optimon risk-assessment scale, with or without a sponsor and the advice of an ethical committee, starting in 2008 and ending before the end of 2010, with a foreseen accrual of 20 patients or more, multicentric with at least 4 clinical sites, with a paper or electronic CRF, with the participating agreement of the coordinating investigator and the sponsor.
- Clinical sites: Sites with a foreseen accrual of 5 patients at least, with the participating agreement of the principal investigator.
- Clinical Research Units: with the label of an institution, with at least 2 years of experience in multicentric studies, with SOPs finalized before 2008, willing to participate in Optimon.
Exclusion Criteria:
- N/A
Contacts and Locations| France | |
| Unité de Soutien Méthodologique à la Recherche Clinique et Epidémiologique du CHU de Bordeaux | |
| Bordeaux, France, 33076 | |
| Study Director: | Geneviève CHENE, MD, PhD | University Hospital, Bordeaux |
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Jean-Pierre LEROY / Clinical Research and Innovation Director, University hospital, Bordeaux |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00780091 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | CHUBX 2005/04 |
| Study First Received: | May 21, 2008 |
| Last Updated: | August 11, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | France: Ministry of Health |
Keywords provided by University Hospital, Bordeaux:
|
optimization risk scale non inferiority cluster randomization monitoring strategies |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013