Evaluation of IV Cardene(Nicardipine)and Labetalol Use in the Emergency Department (CLUE)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of Cardene I.V. to labetalol administered intravenously for the management of hypertension in the emergency department setting.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Hypertensive Urgency |
Drug: Cardene I.V. Drug: Labetalol |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Phase IV, Randomized Trial to Determine the Efficacy and Safety of Cardene I.V. Versus Labetalol for Management of Hypertensive Emergencies in the Emergency Department Setting |
- Percentage of subjects achieving a pre-defined target systolic BP range defined as a systolic blood pressure that is within +/- 20 mmHg of the target as established by the investigator. [ Time Frame: 30 minutes after initiation of therapy ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- Variability in BP: Efficacy of BP control by comparing the AUC of BP-time curve between nicardipine and labetalol [ Time Frame: 6 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Determine heart rate profile during treatment and during ED therapy [ Time Frame: 6 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of dose titrations for Cardene I.V. versus labetalol within 30 minutes [ Time Frame: 6 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- ED time to disposition decision [ Time Frame: 6 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Treatment failure as defined by admission to the hospital or observation unit for BP management [ Time Frame: 6 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- The percent of subjects requiring the use of IV rescue medications [ Time Frame: 6 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Transition time to oral medication [ Time Frame: 6 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Determine the pharmacoeconomic impact of the use of Cardene I.V. compared to labetalol [ Time Frame: 6 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 226 |
| Study Start Date: | October 2008 |
| Study Completion Date: | January 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | January 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: 1
Cardene I.V
|
Drug: Cardene I.V.
Cardene I.V.: 5 mg/h titrated every 5 minutes by 2.5 mg/h until TSBPR is reached or maximum dose of 15 mg/hour is achieved.Following achievement of TSBPR the infusion rate should be decreased to 3 mg/hr
Other Name: Nicardipine hydrochloride
|
|
Active Comparator: 2
Labetalol
|
Drug: Labetalol
Labetalol: bolus therapy to start at 20 mg intravenous injection over 2 minutes, may repeat 20mg, 40mg or 80mg injections every 10 minutes until TSBPR is reached or a maximum of 300 mg is injected.
|
Detailed Description:
More than 3 million patients yearly receive an intravenous antihypertensive agent in the US. Despite this large number of critically ill patients treated annually, little research exists in the area of acute severe hypertension, specifically hypertensive emergency, a serious condition that contributes to morbidity and mortality.
Two agents that are commonly used to treat acute hypertensive crisis include labetalol and nicardipine. Cardene may provide benefits in titration and has shown to have lower dosage adjustments compared to labetalol. Nicardipine has also shown a decreased need for additional antihypertensives when compared to labetalol in patients with stroke in a neurological ICU.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 years of age or older
- Systolic BP≥180 mm Hg on 2 consecutive readings(10 min apart)presenting in the ED
Exclusion Criteria:
- Use of any investigational drug within 1 month prior to ED
- Pregnant or breast-feeding females
- Contraindications or allergy to beta-blockers and calcium channel blockers (see FDA approved labeling for Cardene I.V. and labetalol)
- Subjects with decompensated CHF or with a known LVEF <35%
- History of stroke within 30 days
- Known liver failure
- Suspected myocardial infarction
- Suspected aortic dissection
- Suspected cocaine overdose
- Concurrently receiving other I.V. hypertensive medications
Contacts and Locations| United States, Ohio | |
| Cleveland Clinic | |
| Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44122 | |
| United States, Texas | |
| University of Texas Health Science Center | |
| Houston, Texas, United States | |
| Principal Investigator: | W. Frank Peacock, MD | The Cleveland Clinic |
| Principal Investigator: | Joseph Varon, MD | The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston |
More Information
No publications provided by The Cleveland Clinic
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | W. Frank Peacock IV, MD, Vice Chair Research, Department of Emergency Medicine, Cleveland Clinic |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00765648 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 2008-001 |
| Study First Received: | October 1, 2008 |
| Last Updated: | January 19, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by The Cleveland Clinic:
|
hypertension emergency department Nicardipine |
Labetalol hypertensive emergency hypertensive urgency |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Emergencies Disease Attributes Pathologic Processes Labetalol Nicardipine Antihypertensive Agents Cardiovascular Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions Sympathomimetics Autonomic Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents |
Physiological Effects of Drugs Adrenergic alpha-1 Receptor Antagonists Adrenergic alpha-Antagonists Adrenergic Antagonists Adrenergic Agents Neurotransmitter Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Adrenergic beta-Antagonists Calcium Channel Blockers Membrane Transport Modulators Vasodilator Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013