The Effect Of Fragmin In The Treatment Of Neuroischaemic Foot Ulcers In Diabetic Patients (A6301086)
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Pfizer
Information provided by (Responsible Party):
Pfizer
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00765063
First received: September 30, 2008
Last updated: December 1, 2011
Last verified: December 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The primary objective of this 6 month open-label extension trial is to evaluate long-term safety and tolerability of dalteparin in treatment of chronic neuroischaemic foot ulcers in diabetic patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) and peripheral neuropathy.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Diabetic Foot Ulcer |
Drug: Fragmin |
Phase 2 Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Non-Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A 6 Month, Prospective, Open-Label Multiple Center Extension Trial To Evaluate The Long Term Safety And Sustained Efficacy Of Fragmin In The Treatment Of Chronic Foot Ulcers In Diabetic Patients With Peripheral Arterial Occlusive Disease |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by Pfizer:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- Number of All Hemorrhages [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 (end of treatment [EOT]) or early termination (ET) ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Major hemorrhages: defined as fatal bleeding, clinically overt bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin greater than or equal to 20 gram (g)/litre (L) (2 g/ decilitre [dL]), clinically overt bleeding leading to transfusion of greater than or equal to 2 units of whole blood or red cells, or symptomatic bleeding in areas of special concern (intracranial, retroperitoneal, intraocular, intraspinal, pericardial, intramuscular with compartmental syndrome, or intraarticular). Minor hemorrhages: defined as bleeding that did not meet the definition of major bleeding.
- Number of Major Hemorrhages [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 (EOT) or ET ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Major hemorrhages: defined as fatal bleeding, clinically overt bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin greater than or equal to 20 g/L (2 g/dL), clinically overt bleeding leading to transfusion of greater than or equal to 2 units of whole blood or red cells, or symptomatic bleeding in areas of special concern (intracranial, retroperitoneal, intraocular, intraspinal, pericardial, intramuscular with compartmental syndrome, or intraarticular).
- Number of Minor Hemorrhages [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 (EOT) or ET ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Minor hemorrhages: defined as bleeding that did not meet the definition of major bleeding.
- Number of Clinically Relevant Minor Hemorrhages [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 (EOT) or ET ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Clinically relevant minor (non-major) bleeding was defined as any bleeding compromising hemodynamics, leading to hospitalization, subcutaneous haematoma more than 25 cm^2, intramuscular haematoma, epistaxis lasting for more than 5 minutes, spontaneous gingival bleeding, macroscopic hematuria and gastrointestinal hemorrhage (including at least 1 episode of melaena or hematemesis), rectal blood loss, hemoptysis, and any other bleeding with clinical consequences.
- Number of Trivial Hemorrhages [ Time Frame: Baseline to Week 24 (EOT) or ET ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]Trivial bleeding was defined as all minor bleeding that did not meet the definition of clinically relevant minor bleeding.
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- Number of Participants With Intact Skin Healing [ Time Frame: Baseline through Week 24 (EOT) or ET ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Intact skin healing was defined as 100 percent reduction in ulcer surface area with full epithelialisation. The ulcer area was measured in square millimetre (mm) by measuring the longest width and length of the ulcer after debridement. The area was calculated from an acetate tracing. Ulcers were also documented by standardized photographs. The largest ulcer was considered the study ulcer in participants with multiple ulcers.
- Number of Participants With Improved Ulcer Healing [ Time Frame: Baseline through Week 24 (EOT) or ET ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Improved ulcer healing was defined as greater than or equal to 50 percent reduction in ulcer surface area from baseline of the A6301083 study excluding intact skin healing. The ulcer area was measured in square mm by measuring the longest width and length of the ulcer after debridement. Ulcers were also documented by standardized photographs.
- Number of Participants Who Underwent Amputation [ Time Frame: Baseline through Week 24 (EOT) or ET ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]A major amputation was defined as above the ankle and was reported as below-the-knee and above-the-knee amputations. A minor amputation was defined as below the ankle amputation.
- Time to Intact Skin Healing [ Time Frame: Baseline through Week 24 (EOT) or ET ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Median time (in months) taken to achieve intact skin healing which was defined as 100 percent reduction in ulcer surface area with full epithelialisation.
- Time to First Amputation [ Time Frame: Baseline through Week 24 (EOT) or ET ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of Participants With Major Cardiovascular Disease Events (MCVE) [ Time Frame: Baseline through Week 24 (EOT) or ET ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]MCVE were defined as death due to vascular cause; non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) excluding procedure related to MI; coronary revascularization procedures not related to MIs; hospitalization for unstable angina or non-fatal stroke.
- 11-point Likert Pain Scale [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 (EOT) or ET ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The 11 point Likert pain scale which used a 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) point rating system was used to assess participant's pain score. No distinction was made between neuropathy and inflammatory (nociceptive) pain.
- 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) Score [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24 (EOT) or ET ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]SF-36 is a standardized survey evaluating 8 aspects of functional health and well being: physical and social functioning, physical and emotional role limitations, bodily pain, general health, vitality, mental health. The score for a section is an average of the individual question scores, which are scaled 0-100 (100=highest level of functioning).
| Enrollment: | 62 |
| Study Start Date: | October 2008 |
| Study Completion Date: | October 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | October 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Active
Active study treatment
|
Drug: Fragmin
Pre-filled syringes containing a single dose of 5000 IU Fragmin/ Dalteparin Sodium
Other Name: Dalteparin sodium
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects must have completed the 6 month study duration in the A6301083 study.
- Subjects must have a positive ulcer treatment response, defined as a reduction in the study ulcer area size (ie, ulcer area reduction >0%) at Visit 8 (EOT Visit) from baseline in the A6301083 study.
- All ulcers must have an ulcer staging of 1C, 2C, 1D or 2D according to the University of Texas wound classification system
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subjects who have the following:
- Intact skin healing (defined as 100% reduction in ulcer surface area with full epithelialisation at or prior to the EOT visit in the A6301083 study).
- A study ulcer area at Visit 8 (EOT visit) which is greater or equal to the baseline ulcer area (ie, ulcer area increase ≥0%) in the A6301083 study.
- Subjects with an ulcer grading of 0 or 3 or staging of A or B according to the University of Texas wound classification system.
- Subjects with a known bleeding disorder or evidence of active bleeding.
- Subjects who are on dialysis.
- Subjects who where found to be major protocol violators in A6301083 study.
- Subjects who did not complete the 6 month study period of the A6301083 study
Contacts and Locations
Please refer to this study by its ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00765063
Show 27 Study Locations
Show 27 Study LocationsSponsors and Collaborators
Pfizer
Investigators
| Study Director: | Pfizer CT.gov Call Center | Pfizer |
More Information
Additional Information:
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Pfizer |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00765063 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | A6301086 |
| Study First Received: | September 30, 2008 |
| Results First Received: | August 11, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | December 1, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Spain: Ethics Committee |
Keywords provided by Pfizer:
|
Diabetic Foot Ulcers Neuroischaemic |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Arterial Occlusive Diseases Ulcer Foot Ulcer Diabetic Foot Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Pathologic Processes Foot Diseases Skin Diseases Leg Ulcer Skin Ulcer Diabetic Angiopathies Diabetes Complications |
Diabetes Mellitus Endocrine System Diseases Diabetic Neuropathies Dalteparin Heparin, Low-Molecular-Weight Anticoagulants Hematologic Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions Fibrinolytic Agents Fibrin Modulating Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Cardiovascular Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013