Full Text View
Tabular View
Study Results
Related Studies
Efficacy and Safety Study of Azilsartan Medoxomil Compared to Ramipril for Treating Essential Hypertension
This study has been completed.
Study NCT00760214   Information provided by Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc.

First Received on September 24, 2008.   Last Updated on March 24, 2011   History of Changes
Results First Received: March 24, 2011  
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized;   Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study;   Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment;   Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor);   Primary Purpose: Treatment
Condition: Hypertension
Interventions: Drug: Azilsartan medoxomil
Drug: Ramipril

  Participant Flow
  Hide Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations
Participants enrolled at 122 investigative sites in Bulgaria, Estonia, Finland, Germany, the Netherlands, Poland, Russia, Serbia and Montenegro, Slovakia and Sweden from 24 January 2008 to 21 April 2009.

Pre-Assignment Details
Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment
Participants with essential hypertension were enrolled in one of three, once-daily (QD) treatment groups.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD Azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for two weeks; then increased to 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 22 weeks.
Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD Azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for two weeks; then increased to 80 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 22 weeks.
Ramipril 10 mg QD Ramipril 2.5 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for two weeks; then increased to 10 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 22 weeks.

Participant Flow:   Overall Study
    Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD     Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD     Ramipril 10 mg QD  
STARTED     295     294     296  
COMPLETED     265     264     255  
NOT COMPLETED     30     30     41  
Adverse Event                 8                 9                 12  
Protocol Violation                 3                 0                 3  
Lost to Follow-up                 0                 0                 1  
Withdrawal by Subject                 12                 14                 13  
Lack of Efficacy                 3                 2                 4  
Pregnancy                 0                 0                 1  
Physician Decision                 1                 1                 1  
Other                 3                 4                 6  



  Baseline Characteristics
  Hide Baseline Characteristics

Reporting Groups
  Description
Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD Azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for two weeks; then increased to 40 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 22 weeks.
Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD Azilsartan medoxomil 20 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for two weeks; then increased to 80 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 22 weeks.
Ramipril 10 mg QD Ramipril 2.5 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for two weeks; then increased to 10 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for up to 22 weeks.

Baseline Measures
    Azilsartan Medoxomil 40 mg QD     Azilsartan Medoxomil 80 mg QD     Ramipril 10 mg QD     Total  
Number of Participants  
[units: participants]
  295     294     295     884  
Age  
[units: Participants]
       
<45 years     40     45     30     115  
Between 45 and 64 years     166     168     195     529  
≥65 years     89     81     70     240  
Gender  
[units: participants]
       
Female     136     136     149     421  
Male     159     158     146     463  



  Outcome Measures
  Show All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   Change From Baseline in Mean Trough Clinic Sitting Systolic Blood Pressure.   [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24. ]

2.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Mean Trough Clinic Sitting Diastolic Blood Pressure   [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24. ]

3.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in 24-hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.   [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24. ]

4.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in 24-hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.   [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24. ]

5.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in the 12-hour Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring   [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24. ]

6.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in the 12-hour Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring   [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24. ]

7.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Daytime (6am to 10 pm) Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.   [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24. ]

8.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in Daytime (6am to 10 pm) Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.   [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24. ]

9.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in the Nighttime (12 am to 6 am) Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.   [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24. ]

10.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in the Nighttime (12 am to 6 am) Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.   [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24. ]

11.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in the Trough (22-24-hr) Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.   [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24. ]

12.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in the Trough (22-24-hr) Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring.   [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 24. ]


  Serious Adverse Events
  Show Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events
  Show Other Adverse Events


  More Information
  Hide More Information

Certain Agreements:  
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
The agreement is:
unchecked The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
unchecked The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is more than 60 days but less than or equal to 180 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.


Limitations and Caveats
Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
No text entered.  


Results Point of Contact:  
Name/Title: Sr. VP, Clinical Science
Organization: Takeda Global Research and Development Center, Inc.
phone: 800-778-2860
e-mail: clinicaltrialregistry@tpna.com


No publications provided


Responsible Party: VP Clinical Science, Takeda Global Research & Development Centre (Europe), Ltd..
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00760214     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 01-06-TL-491-020, 2007-002583-10, U1111-1113-8982
Study First Received: September 24, 2008
Results First Received: March 24, 2011
Last Updated: March 24, 2011
Health Authority: Bulgaria: Bulgarian Drug Agency;   Estonia: The State Agency of Medicine;   Finland: Finnish Medicines Agency;   Germany: Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices;   Netherlands: The Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO);   Russia: Ministry of Health and Social Development of the Russian Federation;   Slovakia: State Institute for Drug Control;   Ukraine: State Pharmacological Center - Ministry of Health;   Sweden: Medical Products Agency;   Serbia and Montenegro: Agency for Drugs and Medicinal Devices;   Poland: Office for Registration of Medicinal Products, Medical Devices and Biocidal Products