Efficacy and Cost Analysis of Plastic Stent Compare to Metallic Stent in Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to compare the adequacy of unilateral endoscopic biliary drainage using metallic stent with plastic stent in unresectable, complex, hilar, cholangiocarcinoma and cost analysis.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma |
Device: biliary stent (self expandable metallic stent) Device: PS |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Efficacy and Cost Analysis of Plastic Stent Compare to Metallic Stent in Unresectable Complex Hilar Cholangiocarcinoma; a Randomized Controlled Trial |
- Proportion of Patients With Adequate Biliary Drainage in Metallic Stent and Plastic Stent Group.(ITT Analysis) [ Time Frame: at 2 weeks and 4 weeks after stent insertion ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Successful drainage was defined as a decrease in total bilirubin level to less than 30% or 50% of pretreatment level within two and four weeks respectively in each patient.
- Proportion of Patients With Adequate Biliary Drainage in Metallic Stent and Plastic Stent Group.(Per Protocol Analysis) [ Time Frame: at 2 weeks and 4 weeks after stent insertion ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Successful drainage was defined as a decrease in total bilirubin level to less than 30% or 50% of pretreatment level within two and four weeks respectively.
- Patients Survival Times [ Time Frame: until patient died or 6 months after the last patient was enrolled ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]survival times of the patients after the first stent insertion
- Cost Effective Ratio of Metallic and Plastic Stent [ Time Frame: until the patients expire (Markov model) ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]cost per quality adjusted life year (QALY)of metallic stent and plastic stent calculated from Markov model using transitional probabilities, cost and utilities from this study and the available literature
| Enrollment: | 108 |
| Study Start Date: | November 2007 |
| Study Completion Date: | September 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | April 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: SEMS
self-expandable metal stent group
|
Device: biliary stent (self expandable metallic stent)
metallic stent was inserted into right or left hepatic duct which was planed before intervention using CT scan or MRCP
Other Name: self expandable metallic stent
|
|
Active Comparator: PS
plastic stent group
|
Device: PS
plastic stent was inserted into right or left hepatic duct which was planed before intervention using CT scan or MRCP
Other Name: Amsterdam type plastic stent
|
Detailed Description:
There are two types of biliary stents: 1) the plastic stent made from polyethylene or polytetrafluoroethylene; and, 2) the metal stent braided in the form of a tubular mesh from surgical-grade stainless steel alloy and designed to expand to a maximum diameter of 10 mm. The main drawback of the plastic stent is the relatively high occlusion rate, but its advantage is the lower cost. The use of a metal stent for hilar tumor has many theoretical advantages: 1) the flexible open-mesh design should allow drainage of secondary duct branches; and, 2) its larger diameter may provide better drainage and longer patency (~3-9 months).
Whether one type of stent is superior in terms of adequacy of drainage or cost-effectiveness remains undefined. Therefore, we would conduct this study to assess the efficacy of drainage of endoscopically-inserted, unilateral, plastic stents vs. metallic stents in unresectable, complex, hilar cholangiocarcinoma patients.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Unresectable complex hilar cholangiocarcinoma which diagnosis and staging based on computed tomography(CT) or magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with ASA 4 or 5
- Patients with liver failure.
- Patients unable to comply with follow-up
Contacts and Locations| Thailand | |
| Srinagarind Hospital. KhonKaen University. | |
| Muang, KhonKaen, Thailand, 40002 | |
| Principal Investigator: | apichat sangchan, MD | Department of Medicine. Faculty of Medicine. KhonKaen University |
More Information
Additional Information:
Publications:
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | Apichat Sangchan, Assist. Prof., Khon Kaen University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00721175 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | HE500636 |
| Study First Received: | July 21, 2008 |
| Results First Received: | August 23, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | November 21, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Thailand: Khon Kaen University Ethics Committee for Human Research |
Keywords provided by Khon Kaen University:
|
biliary stent plastic stent metallic stent Complex hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Bismuth type II,III,IV) |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Cholangiocarcinoma Klatskin's Tumor Adenocarcinoma Carcinoma |
Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial Neoplasms by Histologic Type Neoplasms |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 22, 2013