Pre-Hospital Wireless Transmission of Electrocardiograms to a Cardiologist Via a Hand-Held Device
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Aim: To determine the impact of wireless transmission of prehospital ECGs to a hand-held computer on time to treatment and myocardial salvage in acute MI patients.
Background: The TIME-1 investigators documented a 27% (109 to 80 minutes) reduction of time from EMT arrival at the scene to successful primary PCI implementing pre-hospital ECG transmission to the ED. ECG transmission directly to a physician's cellular phone/PDA through a wireless modem has only recently become an option. The recently completed TIME-NorthEast (NE) study tested the Welch Allyn version of this system and the results show a reduction in time to reperfusion for acute MI patients by 66 minutes (116 to 50).
Methods: This study will involve approximately 20 sites around the country. The study will be divided into two phases: a consecutive control data collection phase (Phase I) and an intervention with concurrent control phase (Phase II). Phase II will begin after installation of Welch Allyn ECG transmission equipment. The primary end-point will be time to reperfusion and secondary end-points will include myocardial salvage, aborted infarction and hospital mortality. ECG measurements will be made at a central ECG core lab by a blinded investigator.
Data Analysis: Patient characteristics for the three periods were compared with the chi-square statistic for categorical variables and one-way analysis of variance for age. The Wilcoxon rank-sum statistic was used to compare time-to-reperfusion in the pre-study and study periods as well as in the Group 1 post-study period. Comparisons were performed separately for EMS and self-transport groups.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Myocardial Infarction |
Device: SmartLink Wireless Monitoring System (K033642) |
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Observational Model: Case Control |
| Official Title: | Pre-hospital Wireless Transmission of Electrocardiograms to a Cardiologist Via a Hand-held Device: The TIME Multicenter Study |
- Door to intervention time - time from emergency department door time until intervention. [ Time Frame: time from emergency department door time until intervention. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Salvaged myocardial tissue - pre-hospital ECGs will be read using the Aldrich final MI size prediction to calculate the size of infarct that would be expected to result without reperfusion treatment. [ Time Frame: pre hospital ECG - discharge ECG ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Aborted infarction-defined as combined ECG and cardiac biomarkers criteria:1.subsiding of ST deviation greater than or equal to 50% within 2 hours after reperfusion treatment. 2.rise in cardiac enzymes less than or equal to 2 times upper value of normal. [ Time Frame: 2 hours after reperfusion treatment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Hospital mortality - whether the patient was discharged alive. [ Time Frame: discharge ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- No infarct related artery at time of heart catheterization. [ Time Frame: catheterization ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 527 |
| Study Start Date: | June 2003 |
| Study Completion Date: | May 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | September 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Groups/Cohorts | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Pre-study Period (Group 1 and Group 2).
The TIME-MC study was conducted from June 2003 to June 2008 at NEMC (Figure 1) and from May 2005 to September 2008 at the six larger medical centers (Figure 2). Two groups were studied. Group 1 included patients at NEMC and Group 2 included patients at the other six medical sites. The study was divided into three periods: Pre-study period (Group 1 and Group 2). No PH-ECG transmission system was available. |
|
|
Study Period (Group 1 and Group 2)
Study period (Group 1 and Group 2). PH-ECG transmission to a cardiologist's hand-held device was attempted through pre-assigned EMS ambulances equipped with a wireless ECG transmission device in addition to a STEMI code system. In Group 1, this referred to the pilot study at NEMC from June 2003 to May 2005.
|
Device: SmartLink Wireless Monitoring System (K033642)
All EMS transported patients age 18 or over who have their ECG attempted to be wirelessly transmitted and with the intention to treat with coronary reperfusion therapy (PCI or thrombolytics)based on their initial presentation.
Other Name: Wireless transmission of ECG with intention to treat with coronary reperfusion therapy.
|
|
Post-study period (Group 1)
Post-study period (Group 1). PH-ECG transmission and a STEMI code system implemented after the pilot study period.
|
Device: SmartLink Wireless Monitoring System (K033642)
All EMS transported patients age 18 or over who have their ECG attempted to be wirelessly transmitted and with the intention to treat with coronary reperfusion therapy (PCI or thrombolytics)based on their initial presentation.
Other Name: Wireless transmission of ECG with intention to treat with coronary reperfusion therapy.
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Non-Probability Sample |
EMS transported patients age 18 or over who have their ECG attempted to be wirelessly transmitted and with the intention to treat with coronary reperfusion therapy (PCI or thrombolytics) based on their initial presentation All self transported and EMS transported patients age 18 or over with the intention to undergo reperfusion therapy (PCI or thrombolytics)based on their initial presentation who do not qualify for the intervention group.
Inclusion Criteria:
All patients with a diagnosis of acute STEMI defined as 1 mm ST segment elevation in two spatially contiguous leads were included. There were two major subgroups: emergency medical services (EMS) and self-transport patients. Self-transport patients, who did not have PH-ECG transmission, served as a comparison group.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Less than age 18
- No intent to undergo reperfusion therapy (PCI or thrombolytics)
Contacts and Locations| United States, California | |
| Salinas Valley Memorial Healthcare System | |
| Salinas, California, United States, 93901 | |
| United States, Florida | |
| Shands @ AGH | |
| Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32605 | |
| South Miami Heart Center | |
| Miami, Florida, United States, 33143 | |
| United States, North Carolina | |
| Duke University Medical Center | |
| Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27705 | |
| Durham Regional Hospital | |
| Durham, North Carolina, United States, 27704 | |
| United States, Ohio | |
| Bethesda North Hospital | |
| Cincinnati, Ohio, United States, 45242 | |
| United States, Pennsylvania | |
| University of Pittsburgh Medical Center - Presbyterian | |
| Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States, 15213 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Galen S Wagner, MD | Duke University |
More Information
Publications:
| Responsible Party: | Welch Allyn |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00682526 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | TIME Multicenter Study |
| Study First Received: | May 12, 2008 |
| Last Updated: | February 21, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by Welch Allyn:
|
EMS patients with intention to treat with coronary reperfusion therapy (PCI or thrombolytics) based on their initial presentation |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Infarction Myocardial Infarction Ischemia Pathologic Processes Necrosis |
Myocardial Ischemia Heart Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Vascular Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013