Opioid Titration Order Sheet or Standard Care in Treating Patients With Cancer Pain
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
RATIONALE: An Opioid Titration Order Sheet that allows healthcare providers to adjust the dose and schedule of pain medication may help improve pain treatment for patients with cancer. It is not yet known whether the use of an Opioid Titration Order Sheet is more effective than standard care in treating pain caused by cancer.
PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying an Opioid Titration Order Sheet to see how well it works compared with standard care in treating patients with cancer pain.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Brain and Central Nervous System Tumors Chronic Myeloproliferative Disorders Leukemia Lymphoma Lymphoproliferative Disorder Multiple Myeloma and Plasma Cell Neoplasm Myelodysplastic Syndromes Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms Pain Precancerous Condition Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific |
Other: educational intervention Other: Titrated pain management Other: questionnaire administration |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Supportive Care |
| Official Title: | Phase III Randomized Trial of an Opioid Titration Order Sheet Compared to Standard of Care in Patients With Cancer Related Pain. |
- Pain Intensity [ Time Frame: Baseline(Week 0) to week 8, Total time frame is 9 weeks. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Patients in each arm will each have 9 measures: daily scores averaged over 1 week with baseline to week 8:
- Average daily pain intensity 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst) scale
- Worst daily pain intensity 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst) scale
- Pain-related Distress [ Time Frame: Baseline(Week 0) to week 8, Total time frame is 9 weeks. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Patients in each arm will each have 9 measures: daily scores averaged over 1 week with baseline to week 8. Pain-related distress scale is from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain).
- Pain Duration [ Time Frame: at 9 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Pain duration in hours 0 to 24
- Ability to Engage in Activities of Daily Living (ADL) [ Time Frame: Baseline(Week 0) to week 8, Total time frame is 9 weeks. ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The Functional Assessment Screening Questionnaire (FASQ) scale is used, scored at baseline and at weeks 2, 4, 6, 8. The FASQ consists of 15 questions about ability to perform ADL with minimum score of 1 (easy to perform) to a maximum score of 5 (N/A, meaning someone else performs this activity for the patient or else the patient chooses not to do it). A summary mean score is generated with a minimum score of 1 and a maximum score of 5.
- Interference in Daily Life Due to Pain [ Time Frame: 9 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Patients in each arm will each have 5 measures on the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) scale: baseline + weeks 2, 4, 6, 8. The BPI consists of 7 questions about interference of pain in daily life, answered on a scale of 0 (does not interfere) to 10 (completely interferes). The summary score is the average from the 7 questions, with higher score indicating greater interference due to pain.
- Mood Disturbance [ Time Frame: 9 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Patients in each arm will each have 5 measures on the Profile of Mood States-Short Form (POMS-SF): baseline + weeks 2, 4, 6, 8. The POMS-SF consists of 37 questions, querying 6 mood states (anxiety, depression, anger, confusion, fatigue, and vigor), with responses on a scale from 0 (not at all) to 4 (extremely). To generate a summary score, questions on vigor state are first recoded to reverse the scale, so that higher summary scores consistently indicate greater mood disturbance.
- Quality of Life [ Time Frame: 9 weeks ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Each patient in each arm is scored on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) at baseline + week 8 with 4 related sub-scales (physical, social/family, emotional, functional well-being. To generate sub-scale scores, physical and emotional items are reverse coded & items are then summed, such that higher values indicate better quality of life. Thus, each sub-scale score ranges from 0 (not at all, worse outcome) to 4 (very much, better outcome) with a minimum total score of 0 (worst quality of life) to a maximum of 16 (good quality of life).
| Enrollment: | 98 |
| Study Start Date: | May 2005 |
| Study Completion Date: | May 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | January 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
Standard pain control drugs.
|
Other: educational intervention
Participants will be educated on pain management.
Other: questionnaire administration
Participants will be given questionnaires to complete.
|
|
Experimental: Opioid Titration
Pain will be Monitored and Medication Titrated
|
Other: educational intervention
Participants will be educated on pain management.
Other: Titrated pain management
Pain will be Monitored and Medication Titrated
Other: questionnaire administration
Participants will be given questionnaires to complete.
|
Detailed Description:
OBJECTIVES:
- To examine the effect of an opioid titration order sheet on pain outcomes.
- To examine the effect of an opioid titration order sheet on secondary outcomes of function, mood, and quality of life.
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Participating centers are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
- Arm I (usual care): After completion of baseline assessments, patients undergo a standardized pain education program over approximately 15 minutes. The program consists of standard written materials about communicating pain to providers, opioids and side effect management, as well as a tailored discussion about patient concerns and specific information about prescribed opioid medications. Patients are also instructed in the use of the daily pain diary. Patients are then discharged from the clinic with instructions to contact the treating physician (through standard procedures) for problems with pain or side effects. The study staff conducts weekly telephone interviews to prevent changes in patient pain management practice. The treating physician continues to manage pain in their usual manner.
- Arm II (opioid titration order sheet): After completion of baseline assessments, patients undergo the standardized pain education program and are instructed in the use of the daily pain diary as described in arm I. The treating physician signs an Opioid Titration Order Sheet (OTOS) providing a baseline dose and schedule. The OTOS is faxed to study staff and verified. Patients are then discharged from the clinic with instructions to contact the research nurse for problems with pain or side effects. The treating physician also contacts the study staff if he/she is made aware of any problems pertaining to the patient's pain control. The research nurse, in consultation with study physician, manages pain according to the OTOS and manages opioid side effects using standing orders. Referral to the treating physician is made as needed.
Patients' pain is managed on study for 8 weeks in the absence of unacceptable toxicity, pain crisis, or new site of pain.
Patients complete a demographic questionnaire at baseline and other questionnaires at 2, 4, and 6 weeks (over the telephone) and at 8 weeks (at site or by telephone), including the Functional Assessment Screening Questionnaire (FASQ), the Brief Pain Inventory-Interference (PPI-I), The Profile of Mood States-Short Form (POMS-SF), and the Quality of life (FACT-G) questionnaire. Patients also complete a pain diary recording daily measures of pain dimensions, analgesic use (i.e., fixed dose opioids, rescue doses, and non-opioids), adjuvant medications, and side effects that prevented the patient from taking medications. Data in the pain diary is transcribed over the telephone on a weekly basis.
Clinical data, including the type of cancer, stage of disease, time since diagnosis, current treatment for cancer, type of pain, time since onset of pain, and time of first opioid prescription, as well as information regarding analgesics (opioid and non-opioid), adjuvant medications, and medications to manage side effects prescribed during the study is collected from patients' medical records. Anticancer and palliative treatment received during the study is monitored via treating physician records.
The physician charts are reviewed after study completion to determine whether pain, treatment, and response are adequately documented and treated. The documentation in the physician charts is compared to the documentation obtained by the study staff during the study.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 21 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
- Histologically confirmed carcinoma
Cancer-related pain requiring fixed-dose opioid therapy
Has received ≥ 1 week of fixed-dose opioid therapy AND meets any of the following criteria:
- Inadequate pain control as defined by the patient
- Requires 2 or more rescue doses per day
- Requires adjustments in pain regimen (either fixed or breakthrough dosing)
- No pain crisis that requires hospitalization or immediate anesthetic or neurosurgical intervention
- No predominantly neuropathic pain (e.g., peripheral neuropathy) as assessed by the treating physician
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
- ECOG performance status 0-2
- ANC > 1,500/mm³
- Platelet count > 100,000/mm³
- Serum bilirubin < 1.5 mg/dL
- Serum creatinine < 2.5 mg/dL
- Not pregnant or nursing
- Negative pregnancy test
- Fertile patients must use effective contraception
- Nutritional, pulmonary, and cardiac status must be considered adequate to tolerate the proposed study therapy
- Must be available for active follow-up
- No documented active psychiatric disorder (i.e., psychosis or major depression) that would preclude informed consent or the patient's ability to comply with study procedures
- No significant infection
- No concerns about compliance with medication regimens or medical follow-up
- No excessive alcohol use
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
- See Disease Characteristics
- Concurrent chemotherapy or radiotherapy allowed
Contacts and Locations| United States, Kentucky | |
| Jennie Stuart Medical Center | |
| Hopkinsville, Kentucky, United States, 44240 | |
| Mitchell Memorial Cancer Center at Owensboro Medical Health System | |
| Owensboro, Kentucky, United States, 42303 | |
| United States, Tennessee | |
| Erlanger Health System | |
| Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States, 37403 | |
| Tennessee Plateau Oncology | |
| Crossville, Tennessee, United States, 38555 | |
| Center for Biomedical Research | |
| Knoxville, Tennessee, United States, 37909 | |
| The Jones Clinic | |
| Memphis, Tennessee, United States, 38138 | |
| Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center at Franklin | |
| Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37064 | |
| Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center | |
| Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37232-6838 | |
| Meharry Medical College | |
| Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37208 | |
| Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center - Cool Springs | |
| Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37064 | |
| Veterans Affairs Medical Center - Nashville | |
| Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37212 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Nancy Wells, DNSc, RN | Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Nancy Wells, Research Professor of Nursing; Director, VUMC Nursing; Researcher, Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00666211 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | VICC SUPP 0424, P30CA068485, VU-VICC-SUPP-0424, VU-VICC-040410 |
| Study First Received: | April 23, 2008 |
| Results First Received: | October 21, 2011 |
| Last Updated: | August 4, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center:
|
pain unspecified adult solid tumor, protocol specific accelerated phase chronic myelogenous leukemia acute undifferentiated leukemia adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia in remission adult acute myeloid leukemia in remission adult acute myeloid leukemia with 11q23 (MLL) abnormalities adult acute myeloid leukemia with inv(16)(p13;q22) adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(15;17)(q22;q12) adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(16;16)(p13;q22) adult acute myeloid leukemia with t(8;21)(q22;q22) atypical chronic myeloid leukemia, BCR-ABL negative blastic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia chronic myelomonocytic leukemia chronic phase chronic myelogenous leukemia |
mast cell leukemia meningeal chronic myelogenous leukemia progressive hairy cell leukemia, initial treatment prolymphocytic leukemia recurrent adult acute lymphoblastic leukemia recurrent adult acute myeloid leukemia recurrent adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia refractory hairy cell leukemia relapsing chronic myelogenous leukemia secondary acute myeloid leukemia stage I adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma stage I chronic lymphocytic leukemia stage II adult T-cell leukemia/lymphoma stage II chronic lymphocytic leukemia |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Neoplasms Leukemia Lymphoma Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin Lymphoproliferative Disorders Multiple Myeloma Neoplasms, Plasma Cell Plasmacytoma Myelodysplastic Syndromes Preleukemia Myeloproliferative Disorders Nervous System Neoplasms Precancerous Conditions Lymphoma, Large-Cell, Immunoblastic Central Nervous System Neoplasms |
Myelodysplastic-Myeloproliferative Diseases Neoplasms by Histologic Type Lymphatic Diseases Immunoproliferative Disorders Immune System Diseases Hemostatic Disorders Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Paraproteinemias Blood Protein Disorders Hematologic Diseases Hemorrhagic Disorders Bone Marrow Diseases Neoplasms by Site Nervous System Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 22, 2013