|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsor: | Baylor College of Medicine |
|---|---|
| Information provided by: | Baylor College of Medicine |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00640354 |
Purpose
Automated external defibrillators have improved survival for adult in hospital cardiac arrest. Automated external defibrillators are approved for children aged 1 year and older for out of hospital cardiac arrests. It is unknown whether automated external defibrillators have a role for in hospital pediatric cardiac arrests.
The purpose of study is to compare the management of cardiac rhythm disorders by pediatric residents using an automated external defibrillator versus a standard defibrillator in simulated pediatric cardiac arrests.
It is our hypothesis that residents using an automated external defibrillator will have a shorter time to defibrillation.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Pediatric Residents |
Device: Automated external defibrillator Device: Manual defibrillator |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Defibrillation by Automated External Defibrillators Versus Manual Defibrillators in Simulated Pediatric In-Hospital Cardiac Arrests: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Pediatric Residents |
| Enrollment: | 60 |
| Study Start Date: | December 2006 |
| Study Completion Date: | February 2007 |
| Primary Completion Date: | February 2007 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 1
Pediatric residents randomized to having an automated external defibrillator
|
Device: Automated external defibrillator
Residents randomized to this group had an automated external defibrillator available for the simulated cardiac arrest. The automated external defibrillator did not actually discharge energy into the simulated patient
|
|
Active Comparator: 2
Pediatric residents randomized to having a manual defibrillator
|
Device: Manual defibrillator
Residents randomized to this group had a manual defibrillator available for the simulated cardiac arrest. The defibrillator did not actually discharge energy into the simulated patient.
|
Eligibility| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Contacts and Locations| United States, Texas | |
| Texas Children's Hospital | |
| Houston, Texas, United States, 77030 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Antonio R Mott, MD | Baylor College of Medicine |
More Information
| Responsible Party: | Joseph Rossano / Cardiology Fellow, Baylor College of Medicine |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00640354 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | H - 18876 |
| Study First Received: | March 18, 2008 |
| Last Updated: | March 18, 2008 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
|
Automated External Defibrillator Resuscitation Pediatric |
|
Heart Arrest Heart Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases |