Short Transverse Versus Conventional Hockey Stick Incision in Kidney Transplantation
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Today the minimal invasive access is used for a lot of different operations. This technique takes the advantage of less postoperative pain, better cosmetic results, and a lower surgical complication rate (e.g. hernia, wound infection).
Especially patients under immunosuppressive therapy could benefit from this technique. First results in minimally invasive kidney transplantation indicate that it may be performed quickly and safely. Benefits are expectable on postoperative pain, recovery, and surgical complications. Another retrospective study showed lower rates of hernia, abdominal wall relaxations, and a better postoperative cosmetic.
The aim of this study is to compare the classic hockey stick incision with a minimal invasive incision in a randomized clinical trial.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Kidney Transplantation |
Procedure: Short Transverse Incision Procedure: Hockey Stick Incision |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | "Short Transverse" Versus Conventional "Hockey Stick" Incision in Kidney Transplantation |
- QoR (Quality of Recovery) - Score [ Time Frame: preoperative, day 1/3/5/7 postoperative ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Quality of Life by SF (Short Form) 36 [ Time Frame: preoperative, day 7, week 4, month 6 postoperative ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Operation time [ Time Frame: intraoperative ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Warm ischemic time [ Time Frame: intraoperative ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Postoperative pain measured by VAS (visual analog scale) and amount of analgesia [ Time Frame: day 1/2/3/4/5/6/7 postoperative ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Surgical complications [ Time Frame: day 7, week 4, month 6, month 12 postoperative ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 50 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2008 |
| Study Completion Date: | May 2011 |
| Primary Completion Date: | May 2011 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: 1
Short Transverse Incision
|
Procedure: Short Transverse Incision
Short Transverse Incision for kidney transplantation
|
|
Active Comparator: 2
Hockey Stick Incision
|
Procedure: Hockey Stick Incision
Hockey Stick Incision for kidney transplantation
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age equal or over 18 years
- Sole kidney transplantation
- Consent form
Contacts and Locations| Switzerland | |
| University Hospital Inselspital | |
| Berne, Switzerland, 3010 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Uta Herden, MD | University Hospital Inselspital, Berne |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Daniel Inderbitzin, Clinic of Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Inselspital, Bern |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00592020 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 220/07 |
| Study First Received: | December 31, 2007 |
| Last Updated: | May 20, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Switzerland: Ethikkommission |
Keywords provided by University Hospital Inselspital, Berne:
|
kidney transplantation minimal invasive short transverse |
hockey stick incision quality of life planned kidney transplantation |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013