The Optimization of Procedural Pain Control in Intensive Care Unit (ICU) Patients (OPCIC)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to determine the influence of morphine 2,5 mg or morphine 7,5 mg iv during a painful and unavoidable intervention in critically ill patients.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Critical Illness |
Drug: morphine |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Randomised Clinical Trial of the Optimization of Procedural Pain Control in ICU Patients |
- The percentage of patients with a NRS of ≥ 4 during intervention (2.5 mg versus 7.5 mg morphine iv) [ Time Frame: The first intervention one day after admission ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
- The mean NRS during an intervention (2.5 mg versus 7.5 mg morphine iv) [ Time Frame: 10 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- The percentage of patients with at least one NRS-score of ≥ 4 at rest during ICU stay [ Time Frame: 10 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- The mean NRS per patient in rest during ICU stay [ Time Frame: 10 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- The percentage of patients with a NRS of ≥ 6 during intervention (2.5 mg versus 7.5 mg morphine iv) [ Time Frame: one day after admission in the ICU ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Pharmacokinetic parameters of morphine iv (volumes of distribution and clearance values) [ Time Frame: 10 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Pharmacodynamic parameters of morphine iv (EC50 etc) [ Time Frame: 10 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Covariates for the PK/PD of morphine iv [ Time Frame: 10 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Safety and other measures of the analgesics (morphine iv and paracetamol) used for intervention related pain as well as pain titration protocol for pain control in rest. [ Time Frame: 10 days ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 150 |
| Study Start Date: | February 2008 |
| Study Completion Date: | February 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | February 2009 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: A
patients receive 2,5 mg morphine iv, before the first intervention on the day after admission in the ICU
|
Drug: morphine
patients receive 7,5 mg morphine iv 30 minutes before intervention (turning of the patient), the day after admission in the ICU. before, during and after, the patient will be asked to rate the pain using the NRS
|
Detailed Description:
In 2006, in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) of the St. Antonius Hospital an analgesia improvement program has been implemented. This program consisted of training of ICU nurses and intensivists using a hospital based standardized pain protocol, and systematic pain measurements in rest, rated by the patient himself whenever possible or otherwise by the attending nurse. This program has resulted in a reduction of severe pain levels (NRS≥4) in ICU patients in rest from 41% to 22%. In order to further reduce this percentage, a pain titration protocol is introduced in 2007. As no attention has yet been paid to intervention-related pain levels in these patients, in this prospective study pain control will be studied using different analgesic dosages of morphine iv (2,5 mg vs 7,5 mg) around unavoidable painful interventions within a pain titration protocol for pain control in rest.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 85 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients admitted to the ICU of the St. Antonius hospital, between 18-85 years old en weighing between 45-140 kg.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy/ breastfeeding
- Language barrier
- Known morphine iv allergy
- Comatose patients (cooled)
- Patients who are suspected to be brain-dead
- Unintubated patients on the verge of intubation due to respiratory insufficiency
Contacts and Locations| Netherlands | |
| St antonius Hospital | |
| Nieuwegein, Netherlands, 3430 EM | |
| Principal Investigator: | Catherijne AJ Knibbe, Pharm D | St Antonius Hospital, Department of Clinical Pharmacy |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Dr. C.A.J. Knibbe, hospital pharmacist- clinical pharmacologist, St Antonius Hospital |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00558090 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | R-07.15A/OPCIC, NL18828.100.07 |
| Study First Received: | November 13, 2007 |
| Last Updated: | March 29, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | Netherlands: The Central Committee on Research Involving Human Subjects (CCMO) |
Keywords provided by St. Antonius Hospital:
|
pain Intensive Care Unit morphine |
pKpD numerical rating scale critically ill patients |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Critical Illness Disease Attributes Pathologic Processes Morphine Analgesics, Opioid Analgesics Sensory System Agents |
Peripheral Nervous System Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions Central Nervous System Agents Therapeutic Uses Central Nervous System Depressants Narcotics |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013