Evaluation of the PediGuard™ for Pedicle Screw Insertion
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The aim of the study is to determine the relative effectiveness of the PediGuardTM , a device manufactured by SpineVision, Inc, for placement of a pedicle screw pilot (drill) hole and for reducing pedicle screw breaches during thoracic and lumbar pedicle screw fixation of the spine.
Hypothesis #1 The PediGuardTM will be more accurate for pedicle screw placement as compared to other standard manual techniques of similar size of pedicle screw insertion. At least 90% of screws placed with the PediGuardTM will be positioned correctly in the pedicle (defined as less than 2 mm breach by CT scan). In contrast, only 80% of screws using manual placement will be positioned correctly in the pedicle.
Hypothesis #2 The PediGuardTM will not be inferior to fluoroscopic techniques for pedicle screw insertion. Both techniques will achieve at least 90% accuracy in the placement of pedicle screws.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Posterior Spinal Fusion |
Device: Pediguard |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label |
| Official Title: | Evaluation of the PediGuard™ for Pedicle Screw Insertion |
- At least 90% of screws placed with the PediGuard™ will be positioned correctly in the pedicle (defined as less than 2 mm breach by CT scan). [ Time Frame: Post-op CT prior to discharge ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Enrollment: | 108 |
| Study Start Date: | August 2005 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | November 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
-
Device: Pediguard
Eligibility| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients undergoing primary spinal fusion with pedicle screw fixation of the spine anywhere from T1to S1
- Subjects must be skeletally mature as defined by closed growth plates on wrist via radiographs
- Written informed consent and assent (assent for adolescents)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pedicle screw insertion by image guided techniques, including Fluoronav
- Tumor
- Diagnoses associated with diminished bone mineral density such as osteogenesis imperfecta, severe osteopenia, neurofibromatosis
- Severe senile osteoporosis (> 2 standard deviations below the norm)
- Women who are pregnant
- Children with open growth plates
- Previously fused spinal levels
- Unwillingness to sign written informed consent and assent.
Contacts and Locations| United States, Colorado | |
| Panorama Orthopedics and Spine Center | |
| Golden, Colorado, United States, 80401 | |
| United States, Florida | |
| Miami Children's Hospital | |
| Miami, Florida, United States | |
| University of Miami | |
| Miami, Florida, United States | |
| United States, Kentucky | |
| Spine Institute | |
| Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202 | |
| United States, New York | |
| NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases | |
| NY, New York, United States, 10010 | |
| United States, Pennsylvania | |
| Shriners Hospitals for Children | |
| Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19140 | |
| Canada, Ontario | |
| Victoria Hospital | |
| London, Ontario, Canada, N6A4G5 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Randal Betz, MD | Shriners Hospitals for Children |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Randal Betz, MD, Shriners Hospitals for Children |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00549627 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 4727 |
| Study First Received: | October 24, 2007 |
| Last Updated: | February 3, 2009 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 22, 2013