Titrated Oral Compared With Vaginal Misoprostol for Labor Induction at Term
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to estimate the safety and efficacy of titrated oral misoprostol compared with vaginal route for labor induction at term.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Labor Induction |
Drug: misoprostol |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Health Services Research |
- The interval from the first misoprostol dose to vaginal delivery and the percentage of women who delivered infants vaginally within 12 and 24 hours of induction. The incidence of tachysystole, hypertonus, uterine hyperstimulation and neonatal outcomes. [ Time Frame: within the first week after delivery ]
- Total dosage of misoprostol and the rate of women given oxytocin, cesarean section and induction failure. [ Time Frame: The days during induction ]
| Enrollment: | 220 |
| Study Start Date: | June 2005 |
| Study Completion Date: | March 2007 |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 1
Titrated oral misoprostol
|
Drug: misoprostol
Titrated oral misoprostol: one tablet of 200 microgram was dissolved in water 200 ml, and 20 ml P.O. per one hour for 4 doses, then titrated against uterine response; Vaginal misoprostol: 25 microgram per vagina
|
|
Active Comparator: 2
Vaginal misoprostol
|
Drug: misoprostol
Titrated oral misoprostol: one tablet of 200 microgram was dissolved in water 200 ml, and 20 ml P.O. per one hour for 4 doses, then titrated against uterine response; Vaginal misoprostol: 25 microgram per vagina
|
Detailed Description:
Oral misoprostol absorption is more rapid and possible more predictable, with a peak serum concentration following oral administration of 34 minutes and a half-life of 20-40 minutes. Peak serum concentration for vaginal administration is 60-80 minutes, this level being sustained for up to four hours. Although the direct local effect of vaginal administration on cervical ripening may be advantageous, the shorter half-life of oral delivery may be beneficial in the event of uterine hyperstimulation.In order to avoid uterine hyperstimulation, it appears reasonable to suggest that oral misoprostol should be administered in small, frequent doses, titrated against the uterine response.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 45 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Female |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- 34 to 42 weeks of gestation
- live singleton
- Bishop score < or = 6
- reassuring fetal heart beat pattern
Exclusion Criteria:
- nonreassuring fetal heart beat pattern
- parity ovr five
- any contraindication to labor and/or vaginal delivery
- uterine scar
- suspected placental abruption with abnormal FHR pattern
- vaginal bleeding other than "bloody show"
- cervical dilatation of > or = 4 cm
- uterine contractions > or = 3 in 10 minutes
- significant maternal cardiac, renal or hepatic disease
- hypersensitivity to misoprostol or prostaglandin analogs
Contacts and Locations| Taiwan | |
| China Medical University Beigang Hospital | |
| Yun Lin, Taiwan, 651 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Shi-Yann Cheng, M.D. | Chinal Medical University Beigang Hospital |
More Information
Additional Information:
Publications:
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00529295 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | DMR95-IRB-116 |
| Study First Received: | September 13, 2007 |
| Last Updated: | September 13, 2007 |
| Health Authority: | Taiwan: Department of Health |
Keywords provided by China Medical University Hospital:
|
misoprostol labor induction |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Misoprostol Anti-Ulcer Agents Gastrointestinal Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions |
Oxytocics Reproductive Control Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Abortifacient Agents, Nonsteroidal Abortifacient Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 17, 2013