Improving Quality of Colonoscopy Using a 3D-imager
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
Sorlandet Hospital HF
Information provided by:
Sorlandet Hospital HF
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00519129
First received: August 21, 2007
Last updated: August 17, 2011
Last verified: August 2011
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Coloscopy may be a painful procedure for the patient. This is due to a loop-formation of the coloscope. A 3D-real time imager produced by Olympus creates a real-time image of the scope while a traditional fluoroscopy device will only show instant pictures. We want to investigate whether the 3D-imager causes the patient less pain and is more time consuming than ordinary fluoroscopy
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain During Colonoscopy |
Device: 3D-imager |
Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label |
| Official Title: | Magnetic Endoscopic Imaging Versus Standard Colonoscopy in a Routine Colonoscopy Setting: A Randomised Controlled Trial |
Resource links provided by NLM:
Further study details as provided by Sorlandet Hospital HF:
Primary Outcome Measures:
- pain during coloscopy [ Time Frame: instant ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Time used to reach the coecum [ Time Frame: instant ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Secondary Outcome Measures:
- coecum-intubation rate [ Time Frame: instant ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- level achieved when the coecum can not be reached [ Time Frame: instant ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Need for assistance by a colleague [ Time Frame: instant ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Need for analgetics [ Time Frame: instant ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Pain during the first 24 hours after coloscopy [ Time Frame: 24 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Polyp detection rate [ Time Frame: instant ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 800 |
| Study Start Date: | August 2007 |
| Study Completion Date: | August 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | August 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
Intervention Details:
Detailed Description:
-
Device: 3D-imager
3D-imager vs fluoroscopy during coloscopy
Other Name: Skopguide
Results published in Holme et.al. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy 2011;73:1215-1222.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- All patients referred for coloscopy on an out-patient basis
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnancy
- Pacemaker
- Lack of ability to understand information given
- Prior resection of the colon/rectum
- Demanding analgetics prior to start of procedure
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided by Sorlandet Hospital HF
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | Sorlandet Hospital HF |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00519129 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | SSHF-Colon-1 |
| Study First Received: | August 21, 2007 |
| Last Updated: | August 17, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Norway: Norwegian Social Science Data Services |
Keywords provided by Sorlandet Hospital HF:
|
Pain Patient satisfaction |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013