Efficacy of Irbesartan/Hydrochlorothiazide Versus Valsartan/Hydrochlorothiazide in Mild to Moderate Hypertension (COSIMA2)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The primary objective is to compare the efficacy of irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide 300/25mg against valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide 160/25mg in reducing mean systolic blood pressure (SBP) as measured by home blood pressure monitoring (HBPM) after 24 weeks compared with baseline.
The secondary objectives are:
- To compare the percentage of patients with normal blood pressure as measured by HBPM and at the doctor's office at weeks 16 and 24
- To compare the differences in mean Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP), mean morning and evening SBP and DBP evaluated by HBPM at weeks 16 and 24
- To compare the difference in mean SBP evaluated by HBPM at week 16
- To compare the differences in mean SBP and DBP evaluated at the doctor's office at weeks 16 and 24
- To determine the incidence and severity of adverse events
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Hypertension |
Drug: Irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide Drug: Valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide Drug: Hydrochlorothiazide |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Comparative Study of the Efficacy of Irbesartan/Hydrochlorothiazide 300/25 mg Versus Valsartan/Hydrochlorothiazide 160/25 mg Using Home Blood Pressure Monitoring in the Treatment of Mild to Moderate Hypertension |
- Reduction in mean SBP as measured by HBPM [ Time Frame: From week 0 to week 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Reduction in mean DBP as measured by HBPM [ Time Frame: From week 0 to weeks 16 and 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Reduction in mean morning and evening SBP as measured by HBPM [ Time Frame: From week 0 to weeks 16 and 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Reduction in mean morning and evening DBP as measured by HBPM [ Time Frame: From week 0 to weeks 16 and 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Reduction in mean SBP and mean DBP evaluated at the doctor's office [ Time Frame: From week 0 to weeks 16 and 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of normalised patients as measured by HBPM [ Time Frame: From week 0 to weeks 16 and 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Number of normalised patients evaluated at the doctor's office [ Time Frame: From week 0 to weeks 16 and 24 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Reduction in mean SBP as measured by HBPM [ Time Frame: From week 0 to week 16 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Adverse events, vital signs, laboratory tests [ Time Frame: From visit 1 to end of study ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Enrollment: | 1617 |
| Study Start Date: | July 2007 |
| Study Completion Date: | January 2010 |
| Primary Completion Date: | January 2010 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
Experimental: A
|
Drug: Irbesartan/hydrochlorothiazide
150/12.5mg tablet and 300/12.5mg tablet
Drug: Hydrochlorothiazide
12.5 mg administered orally, once daily in the morning
|
Active Comparator: B
|
Drug: Valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide
80/12.5mg tablet and 160/12.5mg tablet
Drug: Hydrochlorothiazide
12.5 mg administered orally, once daily in the morning
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 80 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Established essential hypertension, untreated or treated but uncontrolled with treatment:
- Office SBP ≥ 160 mmHg for untreated patients
- Office SBP ≥ 140 mmHg for patients already treated with an antihypertensive drug.
Previous antihypertensive therapy must have been implemented for a minimum of 4 weeks and must be either monotherapy or one of the following permitted combination drugs:
- ACE inhibitor / calcium channel blocker
- Beta blocker / calcium channel blocker
- Beta blocker / low dose diuretic
- ACE inhibitor / low dose diuretic
Exclusion Criteria:
- SBP ≥ 180 mmHg and/or DBP ≥ 110 mmHg evaluated at doctor's office at Visit 1
- Known or suspected causes of secondary hypertension
- Patient with bilateral renal artery stenosis, renal artery stenosis in a solitary kidney, a renal transplant or only has one functioning kidney
- Type 1 diabetes mellitus
- Significant cardiovascular, neurological, endocrine, renal, metabolic, or gastrointestinal disease, a malignancy or any other diseases considered by the Investigator to make participation in the study not in the best interest of the subject
- Known hypersensitivity to diuretics or sulphonamides or history of angioedema or cough related to the administration of an angiotensin II receptor antagonist or any combination of the drugs used
- Known contraindications to any of the study drugs
- Concomitant use of any other antihypertensive treatment
- Use of any of the investigational products for this study within the 3 months prior to the study
- Inability to obtain a valid HBPM recording i.e., obesity, arm circumference > 32 cm or arrhythmia
- Administration of any other investigational drug in the last 30 days before enrolment and during the course of the study
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women
- Women of childbearing potential not protected by effective contraceptive method of birth control and/or who are unwilling or unable to be tested for pregnancy
The above information is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a patient's potential participation in a clinical trial.
Contacts and Locations| Egypt | |
| Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office | |
| Cairo, Egypt | |
| Hong Kong | |
| Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office | |
| Hong Kong, Hong Kong | |
| India | |
| Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office | |
| Mumbai, India | |
| Indonesia | |
| Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office | |
| Jakarta, Indonesia | |
| Korea, Republic of | |
| Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office | |
| Seoul, Korea, Republic of | |
| Malaysia | |
| Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office | |
| Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia | |
| Morocco | |
| Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office | |
| Casablanca, Morocco | |
| Pakistan | |
| Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office | |
| Karachi, Pakistan | |
| Philippines | |
| Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office | |
| Makati City, Philippines | |
| Singapore | |
| Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office | |
| Singapore, Singapore | |
| Taiwan | |
| Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office | |
| Taipei, Taiwan | |
| Thailand | |
| Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office | |
| Bangkok, Thailand | |
| Tunisia | |
| Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office | |
| Megrine, Tunisia | |
| Vietnam | |
| Sanofi-Aventis Administrative Office | |
| Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam | |
| Study Director: | Benedict Blayney | Sanofi |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Medical Affairs Study Director, sanofi-aventis |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00500604 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | IRBEH_R_02584 |
| Study First Received: | July 11, 2007 |
| Last Updated: | July 16, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | Taiwan: Institutional Review Board |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Hypertension Vascular Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Hydrochlorothiazide Valsartan Irbesartan Diuretics Natriuretic Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs |
Pharmacologic Actions Sodium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors Membrane Transport Modulators Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Antihypertensive Agents Cardiovascular Agents Therapeutic Uses Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013