Biventricular Pacing After Cardiopulmonary Bypass (BIPACS)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to investigate the efficacy of optimized temporary biventricular pacing (BiVP) in patients undergoing open-heart surgery with preoperative LV dysfunction and an intraventricular conduction delay. This study will compare extended temporary biventricular pacing versus standard of care by assessing patients randomized to the two groups, from the conclusion of cardiopulmonary bypass, until the conclusion of pharmacologic circulatory support in the intensive care unit. In addition, effects of biventricular pacing will be tested in all patients, at three time points, using different measures of blood flow. Results from this research will demonstrate whether temporary BiVP improves cardiac output after open-heart surgery and whether ventricular pacing optimization increases cardiac output in this setting. Success would lead to the development of recommendations for use of BiVP postoperatively and would stimulate the development of pacemakers with appropriate features. Our primary hypothesis is that the optimum pacing protocol (POPT) will increase cardiac index (CI) by 15% (from approximately 2.30 to 2.64 L/min/m2) compared to standard of care as measured by thermodilution 12-24 hours postoperatively. Secondary objectives include defining POPT at three time points within 24 hours of surgery. We will examine which forms of cardiac dysfunction benefit from temporary pacing using direct and indirect measures of perfusion and cardiac function. We will also analyze survival, length of stay, incidence of arrhythmias, and cost of postoperative care.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Heart Failure |
Device: Temporary Biventricular Pacing |
Phase 1 Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Biventricular Pacing After Cardiopulmonary Bypass |
- The primary end point is a 15% improvement in thermal dilution Cl measured in the intensive care unit (ICU). [ Time Frame: 24 hours ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Secondary end points include incidence of arrhythmias, inotropic support, urine output, weight gain, morbidity, mortality, and ICU costs. [ Time Frame: 30 days after surgery ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Enrollment: | 114 |
| Study Start Date: | October 2006 |
| Study Completion Date: | March 2012 |
| Primary Completion Date: | March 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: POPT
Temporary Biventricular Pacing
|
Device: Temporary Biventricular Pacing
Pacing Optimization tested at three time points for both arms. Continuous temporary biventricular pacing for 24 hours in experimental group only.
Other Name: Medtronic Insync III
|
|
No Intervention: Standard of Care
Control Group - Intermittent biventricular pacing tested for optimization only.
|
Device: Temporary Biventricular Pacing
Pacing Optimization tested at three time points for both arms. Continuous temporary biventricular pacing for 24 hours in experimental group only.
Other Name: Medtronic Insync III
|
Detailed Description:
Biventricular pacing (BiVP) reverses intraventricular conduction delay (IVCD) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction in dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). BiVP improves LV function and cardiac index (Cl) at no energy cost. In the MIRACLE trial, in patients with DCM, IVCD and LV ejection fraction <35%, demonstrated improved subjective and objective measures of exercise tolerance and cardiac function with BiVP. BiVP benefits many, but selection criteria are not fully developed, and 30% of recipients are "nonresponders," at a cost of more than $2 billion/year. Preliminary data suggest that BiVP can benefit patients with low output states after cardiac surgery. We plan to assess surgical application of BiVP while assessing mechanisms of action and optimization. We will randomize 190 cardiac surgery patients with LV dysfunction preoperatively to paced and standard of care groups. BiVP will be optimized and continued postoperatively until patients are stable. BiVP will be assessed transiently in all patients at three time points. The primary end point is a 15% improvement in thermal dilution Cl measured in the intensive care unit (ICU). Effects of heart rate, atrioventricular delay, ventricular pacing site, and interventricular delay on Cl will be assessed using a randomized sequence of data collection. Secondary endpoints include incidence of arrhythmias, inotropic support, urine output, weight gain, morbidity, mortality, and ICU costs. These studies are important because of a high probability of clinical benefit. The methods employed will provide precision, breadth of measurement, and range of pacing sites superior to any other setting. The protocol will provide new and important scientific information that will benefit not only surgical patients but also the general population of BiVP recipients.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- LV ejection fraction < 41%
- QRS duration > 99 msec
Or:
- Mitral and Aortic Valve Repair or Replacement
Exclusion Criteria:
- Congenital Heart Disease
- Intracardiac Shunts
- Preoperative Pacing for Heart Block (2nd or 3rd degree) or Sinus Bradycardia
- Heart Rate > 120 beats per min after Cardiopulmonary Bypass
- Preoperative Atrial Fibrillation
- Previous Cardiac Surgery
- Inability to undergo biventricular pacing prior to randomization
Contacts and Locations
More Information
Additional Information:
No publications provided by Columbia University
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | Henry M. Spotnitz, George H. Humphreys, II Professor of Surgery, Columbia University |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00498940 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | AAAB5600, R01HL080152 |
| Study First Received: | July 9, 2007 |
| Last Updated: | May 11, 2012 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by Columbia University:
|
LV function, Compliance, wall motion, echocardiography |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Heart Failure Heart Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013