Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Different Closure Methods for Laparoscopic Port Sites
This study has been completed.
Sponsor:
New York Downtown Hospital
Information provided by:
New York Downtown Hospital
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier:
NCT00466648
First received: April 25, 2007
Last updated: NA
Last verified: April 2007
History: No changes posted
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This study wishes to compare patient satisfaction and cosmesis of two different closure methods of laparoscopic ports. One method uses tissue adhesive (Dermabond) with a deep sub-cutaneous stitch and a Band-Aid dressing. The comparison method uses a 3.o undyed vicryl transcutaneous stitch, with a Bacitracin and Tegaderm dressing.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Laparoscopic Cosmesis |
Procedure: Tissue adhesive |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Single Blind Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Two Different Methods of Laparoscopy Port Closure |
Further study details as provided by New York Downtown Hospital:
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 16 Years to 70 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Female |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- gynecologic laparoscopy patients
Exclusion Criteria:
- known sensitivity to tissue adhesive, antibiotic ointment
Contacts and Locations More Information
No publications provided
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00466648 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | HV-2007 |
| Study First Received: | April 25, 2007 |
| Last Updated: | April 25, 2007 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by New York Downtown Hospital:
|
laparoscopy, port site, closure, Dermabond |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013