|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsor: | University of Southern California |
|---|---|
| Collaborator: |
AstraZeneca |
| Information provided by: | University of Southern California |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00457366 |
Purpose
In the Psychiatric Emergency Room, agitated patients are treated routinely with an I.M. Haloperidol "cocktail" (Haloperidol 5 mg, Lorazepam 2 mg, Cogentin 2 mg), which has proved to be an effective treatment. However, since it is an intramuscular injection, it is more complicated and perhaps less acceptable to patients as well as more likely to cause EPS (extrapyramidal symptoms). Of late in our emergency room, we started using high dose Quetiapine 300 mg PO to replace the "cocktail" for treating agitation. It has shown promising results.
This study is designed to compare the efficacy and safety of Quetiapine with the routine "cocktail for treatment of agitation.
The primary purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy and safety of Quetiapine by using high dose Quetiapine (300 mg) PO to treat agitated patients in the psychiatric emergency room.
The secondary purpose is to test the immediate effect on agitation caused by illicit drug abuse or the alcohol abuse.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Agitation |
Drug: Quetiapine Drug: Cocktail (Haloperidol, Lorazepam, Cogentin) |
Phase IV |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Comparison Study of the Efficacy of a Rapid Titration of Quetiapine and Haloperidol in Agitated Adults in an Emergency Setting. |
| Enrollment: | 72 |
| Study Start Date: | May 2006 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | May 2009 |
| Primary Completion Date: | August 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: 1
Quetiapine
|
Drug: Quetiapine
Quetiapine 300mg PO/Initial dose and repeat dose at 2 hours if deemed clinically necessary upto a maximum dose of Quetiapine 600mg PO QD
|
|
Active Comparator: 2
Cocktail (Haloperidol, Lorazepam, Cogentin)
|
Drug: Cocktail (Haloperidol, Lorazepam, Cogentin)
Haloperidol 5 mg im, Lorazepam 2 mg im, Cogentin 2 mg im; repeated at 2 hours as deemed clinically necessary
|
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 60 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Contacts and Locations| United States, California | |
| Los Angeles County Hospital | |
| LA, California, United States, 90033 | |
| Principal Investigator: | George M Simpson, MD | USC+LAC Medical Center |
More Information
| Responsible Party: | George M.Simpson,MD, USC+LAC Medical Center |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00457366 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | HS-05-00331 |
| Study First Received: | April 4, 2007 |
| Last Updated: | March 24, 2009 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
|
Emergencies Psychomotor Agitation Disease Attributes Pathologic Processes Dyskinesias Neurologic Manifestations Nervous System Diseases Psychomotor Disorders Neurobehavioral Manifestations Signs and Symptoms Benztropine Haloperidol Lorazepam Haloperidol decanoate Quetiapine |
Antiparkinson Agents Anti-Dyskinesia Agents Central Nervous System Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions Parasympatholytics Autonomic Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Physiological Effects of Drugs Muscarinic Antagonists Cholinergic Antagonists Cholinergic Agents Neurotransmitter Agents Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Dopamine Uptake Inhibitors |