Educational CD-ROM Compared With Standard Informed Consent for Patients With Colorectal Cancer or a Family History of Colorectal Cancer

• Impact of standard informed consent vs CD-ROM educational intervention on knowledge about microsatellite instability (MSI) testing [ Time Frame: at enrollment and 2 weeks after enrollment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  Participants completed a baseline survey upon enrollment to the trial. 2 weeks after baseline, they completed a follow-up survey (assessed at both baseline and FU).
  
  

• Differential impact of CD-ROM on satisfaction with MSI test decision, difficulty making decision & decisional conflict; attitude; general & cancer-related distress; discussions with family about MSI test & familial colorectal cancer risk [ Time Frame: at enrollment and 2 weeks after enrollment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  Participants completed a baseline survey upon enrollment to the trial. 2 weeks after baseline, they completed a follow-up survey (assessed at both baseline and FU).
  
  
• Impact of demographic factors, disease/family history characteristics, family support, and cancer-related distress on satisfaction with and completeness of the informed consent process [ Time Frame: at enrollment and 2 weeks after enrollment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  Participants completed a baseline survey upon enrollment to the trial. 2 weeks after baseline, they completed a follow-up survey (assessed at both baseline and FU).
  
  
• Patient satisfaction with the preparation to make a decision [ Time Frame: at enrollment and 2 weeks after enrollment ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
  Participants completed a baseline survey upon enrollment to the trial. 2 weeks after baseline, they completed a follow-up survey (assessed at both baseline and FU).
  
  

OBJECTIVES:

Primary

• Compare the impact of standard informed consent vs a CD-ROM educational intervention on knowledge about microsatellite instability (MSI) testing in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) or a family history of CRC.
• Determine the impact of these interventions on patient satisfaction with the preparation to make a decision.

Secondary

• Determine whether the CD-ROM educational intervention has a differential impact on satisfaction with the MSI test decision, difficulty making the MSI test decision, and decisional conflict, as well as on patients' attitudes about MSI testing and CRC (e.g., perceived benefits and barriers to having the MSI test, perceived risk for colorectal and related cancers, self-efficacy), on general and cancer-related distress, and on discussions with family members about the MSI test and familial CRC risk.
• Assess whether demographic factors, disease/family history characteristics, family support for testing, and cancer-related distress moderate the impact of the intervention on satisfaction with and completeness of the informed consent process.

OUTLINE: This is a multicenter, pilot, study (part I) followed by a randomized study (part II).

• Part I: The educational CD-ROM is developed over 9 months. Patients receive a pilot version of the CD-ROM and provide feedback regarding usability and content.

• Part II: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 arms.

  • Arm I: Patients complete a baseline interview and receive a standard informed consent for microsatellite instability (MSI) testing and a brief, standardized explanation of the MSI test.
  • Arm II: Patients complete a baseline interview and receive a standard informed consent for MSI testing and the educational CD-ROM developed in phase I.

All patients in part II (even those that did not consent to the MSI test) complete a follow-up survey at 2 weeks.

Tissue samples from patients are analyzed by immunohistochemistry and MSI assay (polymerase chain reaction) for MLH1 and MSH2.

PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 184 patients will be accrued for this study.