CPAP Versus NPPV in ACPE
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
To assess the intubation rate in patients affected by severe cardiogenic pulmonary edema treated with CPAP or NPPV.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Pulmonary Edema |
Device: CPAP and Non Invasive Ventilation |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Versus Non-Invasive Positive Pressure Support Ventilation in Acute Cardiogenic Pulmonary Oedema: a Prospective Randomised Multicentre Trial. |
- Intubation rate
- time of recovery
- hospital length of stay
- mortality and improvement in gas exchange
| Estimated Enrollment: | 80 |
| Study Start Date: | July 2002 |
| Study Completion Date: | May 2005 |
Background Although non-invasive ventilation has shown to be an effective treatment for acute cardiogenic pulmonary oedema (ACPO), literature still lacks of multi-centre randomised prospective studies that compares CPAP with NPPV.
Aim of the study was to assess efficacy and safety of CPAP and NPPV in patients with ACPO.
Methods 80 patients with ACPO were randomly assigned to receive CPAP or NPPV (40 for each group) through a face mask.
Inclusion criteria were: severe dyspnoea, respiratory rate > 30, PaO2/FiO2 < 200, muscle fatigue.
Main end-points were endotracheal intubation, length of ventilation, hospital length of stay and mortality.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- rapid onset of the symptoms
- severe dyspnoea at rest
- respiratory rate > 30 breath per minute
- use of accessory respiratory muscles
- PaO2/FiO2 < 200, radiological findings of ACPE
Exclusion Criteria:
- ST elevation myocardial infarction
- hemodynamic instability (systolic arterial pressure < 90 mmHg
- need for immediate endotracheal intubation (respiratory arrest, bradypnea
- inability to protect the airways, impaired sensorium (agitation or unconsciousness
- inability to clear secretions, respiratory tract infections
- chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) exacerbation, chronic respiratory failure necessitating long-term oxygen therapy
- pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, recent oesophageal-gastric surgery
- gastrointestinal bleeding
- facial deformities
- haematological malignancy or cancer with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≥ 2.
Contacts and Locations| Italy | |
| Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco Medicina d'Urgenza | |
| Torino, Italy, 10154 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Giovanni Ferrari, MD | Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco ASL4 |
| Principal Investigator: | Giovanni Ferrari, MD | Ospedale San Giovanni Bosco ASL4 Torino Italy |
More Information
No publications provided
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00446498 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | gbosco1 |
| Study First Received: | March 12, 2007 |
| Last Updated: | April 2, 2007 |
| Health Authority: | Italy: Ministry of Health |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Edema Pulmonary Edema Signs and Symptoms Lung Diseases Respiratory Tract Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013