Jet Injection of 1% Buffered Lidocaine Versus Topical ELA-Max for Anesthesia Prior to Intravenous (IV) Catheterization in Children
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This trial is a comparison of the anesthetic effectiveness of J-Tip needle-free jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine to the anesthetic effectiveness of topical 4% ELA-Max for peripheral intravenous catheter (PIV) insertion. The researchers hypothesize that the jet injection of lidocaine will provide superior anesthesia to the ELA-Max prior to PIV insertion.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain |
Procedure: J-tip jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine |
Phase 4 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Single Blind Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Jet Injection of 1% Buffered Lidocaine Versus Topical ELA-Max for Anesthesia Prior to Peripheral Intravenous Catheterization in Children |
- VAS pain scores for the PIV insertion as judged by the patients and the blinded observer.
- Secondary outcome measures included patient and blinded observer VAS scores for pain of jet injection, patient and blinded observer scores for anxiety of PIV insertion, nursing satisfaction of placing the PIV with jet injection or ELA-Maxâ, nursing diffi
| Estimated Enrollment: | 70 |
| Study Start Date: | April 2005 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | April 2006 |
A prospective, block-randomized, controlled trial comparing J-Tip jet injection of 1% buffered lidocaine to a 30-minute application of 4% ELA-Max for topical anesthesia in children 8-15 years old presenting to a tertiary care pediatric emergency department for PIV insertion. All subjects recorded self-reported Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores for pain at time of enrollment and pain of PIV insertion. Jet injection subjects also recorded pain of jet injection. Subjects were videotaped during jet injection and PIV insertion. Videotapes were reviewed by a single blinded reviewer for observer-reported VAS pain scores for jet injection and PIV insertion.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 8 Years to 15 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Between the ages of 8-15 years requiring a PIV as part of their management in the emergency department.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Excluded from the study if they reported use of analgesic medication within 6 hours of enrollment,
- Had a Glasgow Coma Score < 15,
- A baseline screening VAS pain score > 20 mm, or
- A history of skin hypersensitivity or lidocaine allergy,
- Were incapable of self-reporting a pain score,
- Had a known neurological condition that alters pain perception,
- Had methemoglobinemia, or
- Did not speak or understand English.
Contacts and Locations| United States, Kentucky | |
| Kosair Children's Hospital | |
| Louisville, Kentucky, United States, 40202 | |
| Study Director: | In K Kim, MD | Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Kosair Children’s Hospital, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky |
More Information
No publications provided by Norton Healthcare
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00444756 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 622.04 |
| Study First Received: | March 7, 2007 |
| Last Updated: | March 7, 2007 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by Norton Healthcare:
|
local anesthesia analgesia peripheral IV Local anesthesia prior to peripheral IV insertion |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Anesthetics Lidocaine Central Nervous System Depressants Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions Central Nervous System Agents |
Therapeutic Uses Anesthetics, Local Sensory System Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Anti-Arrhythmia Agents Cardiovascular Agents |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013