Surgical Treatment Comparison for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study is to compare patients who underwent decompression/discectomy with pedicle screw fusion to patients who received decompression/discectomy without fusion.
| Study Type: | Observational |
| Study Design: | Time Perspective: Prospective |
| Official Title: | Surgical Treatment Comparison for Recurrent Lumbar Disc Herniation |
| Enrollment: | 4 |
| Study Start Date: | March 2007 |
| Study Completion Date: | April 2009 |
Lumbar disc herniations are quite common and typically improve after surgical correction. However, some patients develop recurrent herniations at the same level. Controversy exists as to why reherniated discs occur. Moreover, existing research does not settle the issue of whether a second decompression/discectomy or a repeat decompression/discectomy with pedicle screw fusion is the more successful treatment. This study is designed to compare differences in patient-reported pain, physical function, and satisfaction between the two types of surgery patients.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 75 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
| Sampling Method: | Non-Probability Sample |
Adult patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation.
Inclusion Criteria:
- Recurrent lumbar disc herniation by MRI or CT with history of decompression at the same level in the past
- Recurrent symptomatic history (with or without back pain) with radicular leg pain that improved following the first surgery
- Male or female 18-75 years old
- Flexion and extension x-rays that demonstrate an absence of sponylolisthesis or spondylolisthesis with less than 3 mm of movement
Exclusion Criteria:
- Recurrence of disc herniation within 3 months of first decompression
- Multiple level herniated discs
- No history of lumbar back surgery except as in Inclusion criteria above
- Documented severe osteoporosis or osteopenia
- Symptoms of low back pain only
- Diabetes mellitus
- Patients with suspected or diagnosed psychological/psychiatric problems that could compromise the reliability of their results
- Lumbar spondylolisthesis on flexion/extension x-rays > 3 mm
- History of lumbar spine fractures (new or old)
- Any concurrent medical condition that may interfere with the interpretation of efficacy and safety data during the study
- Autoimmune diseases
- Age less than 18 or greater than 75 years
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Layla Stanek, Clinical Research Coordinator, St. John's Health System, Missouri |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00444405 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | SJCNS-01 |
| Study First Received: | March 6, 2007 |
| Last Updated: | October 12, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by St. John's Health System, Missouri:
|
lumbar disc herniation |
discectomy fusion spine |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Back Pain Hernia Low Back Pain Intervertebral Disk Displacement Pain Neurologic Manifestations |
Nervous System Diseases Signs and Symptoms Pathological Conditions, Anatomical Spinal Diseases Bone Diseases Musculoskeletal Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013