Optimized Perioperative Analgesia Reduces the Prevalence and the Intensity of Phantom Pain in Lower Limb Amputation
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Severe pre-amputation pain is associated with phantom pain development, and phantom pain models assign major importance to central and peripheral nervous system changes related to pre-amputation pain. Several interventions have been evaluated for phantom pain prevention, including continuous brachial plexus blockade5, intravenous6 or epidural ketamine administration, postoperative perineural ketamine/clonidine infusion8 and oral gabapentin9, but their true effect remains unclear.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Phantom Limb Pain |
Procedure: perioperative epidural catheter |
Phase 2 Phase 3 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Factorial Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor) Primary Purpose: Prevention |
| Official Title: | Double Blind, Placebo Controlled Study for the Study of the Effectiveness of Perioperative Analgesia in Phantom and Stump Pain |
- VAS and McGill PRI(R)2 scores for phantom and stump pain are recorded 48 and 24 hours before, and 4 and 10 days, 1 and 6 months after amputation. Phantom and stump pain intensity are the endpoints of the study. [ Time Frame: six months ] [ Designated as safety issue: Yes ]
| Enrollment: | 60 |
| Study Start Date: | December 2003 |
| Study Completion Date: | May 2009 |
| Primary Completion Date: | May 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Active Comparator: 1
perioperative epidural analgesia
|
Procedure: perioperative epidural catheter
Perioperative epidural catheter in groups 1-4. Pre- and postoperative epidural analgesia in group 1. Preoperative IV PCA Fentanyl and postoperative epidural analgesia in group 2. Perioperative IV PCA Fentanyl in groups 2,3. IM meperidine p.o. codeine/acetaminophen, IV acetaminophen and IV parecoxib in group 5 (control)
|
|
Active Comparator: 2
Iv PCA Fentanyl preoperative, Epidural analgesia postoperative
|
Procedure: perioperative epidural catheter
Perioperative epidural catheter in groups 1-4. Pre- and postoperative epidural analgesia in group 1. Preoperative IV PCA Fentanyl and postoperative epidural analgesia in group 2. Perioperative IV PCA Fentanyl in groups 2,3. IM meperidine p.o. codeine/acetaminophen, IV acetaminophen and IV parecoxib in group 5 (control)
|
|
Active Comparator: 3
perioperative IV PCA Fentanyl, epidural anesthesia
|
Procedure: perioperative epidural catheter
Perioperative epidural catheter in groups 1-4. Pre- and postoperative epidural analgesia in group 1. Preoperative IV PCA Fentanyl and postoperative epidural analgesia in group 2. Perioperative IV PCA Fentanyl in groups 2,3. IM meperidine p.o. codeine/acetaminophen, IV acetaminophen and IV parecoxib in group 5 (control)
|
|
Active Comparator: 4
perioperative IV PCA Fentanyl general anesthesia
|
Procedure: perioperative epidural catheter
Perioperative epidural catheter in groups 1-4. Pre- and postoperative epidural analgesia in group 1. Preoperative IV PCA Fentanyl and postoperative epidural analgesia in group 2. Perioperative IV PCA Fentanyl in groups 2,3. IM meperidine p.o. codeine/acetaminophen, IV acetaminophen and IV parecoxib in group 5 (control)
|
|
Placebo Comparator: 5
IV PCA with saline 0.9% and sc saline 0.9%in the L3-L4 area. IM meperidine, po codeine/acetaminophen, IV acetaminophen and IV parecoxib
|
Procedure: perioperative epidural catheter
Perioperative epidural catheter in groups 1-4. Pre- and postoperative epidural analgesia in group 1. Preoperative IV PCA Fentanyl and postoperative epidural analgesia in group 2. Perioperative IV PCA Fentanyl in groups 2,3. IM meperidine p.o. codeine/acetaminophen, IV acetaminophen and IV parecoxib in group 5 (control)
|
Detailed Description:
In a prospective, randomized, double-blind trial, 65 patients undergoing elective lower limb amputation were assigned to one of five analgesic regimens. Patients in groups 1-4 had lumbar epidural catheter placed 48 hours before amputation, and received epidural bupivacaine/fentanyl or saline infusion before and/or after amputation. Patients receiving epidural saline also had IV Fentanyl Patient-Control Analgesia, whereas patients receiving epidural analgesia also had IV saline. Group 5 (control) received IM meperidine and oral codeine/acetaminophen. VAS and McGill Pain Questionnaire (MPQ) scores (for ischemic, phantom and stump pain) were recorded starting 48 hours before, continuing until 48 hours after amputation, and at 4 days, 10 days, 1 and 6 months after amputation. Phantom and stump pain intensity and frequency were the main study endpoints.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 82 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age >18, Visual Analog. Scale (VAS) pain score >70mm which was frequent or continuous one week before scheduled major (above or below knee) amputation, and patient consent.
Exclusion Criteria:
- No written patient consent
- Age < 18 years
- Age > 82 years
- Antiplatelet medication
- Mental status not acceptable
- Exclusion criteria were age >85
- Emergency amputation
- Ipsilateral re-amputation
- Foot or toe amputation
- Inability to complete a detailed pain questionnaire
- History of chronic pain or substance abuse
- Active psychiatric disease requiring treatment
- Any contraindication to epidural catheter placement (anticoagulation, anti-platelet medications, previous lumbar spine surgery).
Contacts and Locations| Greece | |
| Patras, Greece | |
| Principal Investigator: | Diamanto N. Aretha, MD | University of Patras, School of Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Rion, 26500, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine |
| Study Director: | Menelaos Karanikolas, MD, MPH | University of Patras, School of Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Rion, 26500, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine |
| Study Chair: | Kriton S Filos, MD Professor | University of Patras, School of Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Rion, 26500, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine |
| Principal Investigator: | Georgia Monantera, MD | University of Patras, School of Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Rion, 26500, Department of Anaesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine |
| Study Director: | Ioannis Tsolakis, MD Professor | University of Patras, School of Medicine, University Hospital of Patras, Rion, 26500, Department of Surgery |
More Information
No publications provided by University of Patras
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | Diamanto Aretha, University Hospital of Patras |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00443404 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | phantom pain-UPatras, There are no secondary Id |
| Study First Received: | March 5, 2007 |
| Last Updated: | November 4, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Greece: Ethics Committee |
Keywords provided by University of Patras:
|
phantom amputation analgesia pain preemptive perioperative |
lower limb amputation intensity of phantom limb pain preemptive analgesia reduces phantom pain perioperative analgesia reduces phantom pain Severe Phantom Limb Pain (VAS>70 mm) resistant to medical treatment one week before amputation |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Phantom Limb Perceptual Disorders Neurobehavioral Manifestations Neurologic Manifestations Nervous System Diseases Signs and Symptoms Acetaminophen Antipyretics |
Physiological Effects of Drugs Pharmacologic Actions Analgesics, Non-Narcotic Analgesics Sensory System Agents Peripheral Nervous System Agents Central Nervous System Agents Therapeutic Uses |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on June 18, 2013