The Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on muscle atrophy in sedated patients on intensive care was studied. The aim of this study was to explore if electrical stimulation could prevent muscle atrophy.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Postoperative Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Ventilatory Failure |
Device: ELECTRICAL STIMULATION |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double-Blind Primary Purpose: Prevention |
| Official Title: | on Muscle Wasting in Artificially Ventilated and Sedated Patients at the Intensive Care Unit: a Pilot Study |
- Perimeter of the right and left thighs was measured in both groups every 3 days at 5 cm above the upp
| Estimated Enrollment: | 21 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2003 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | June 2003 |
Patients were included in the study one day after administration when prolonged sedation and ventilation were expected. They were divided into intervention (n=7) and control (n=14) groups. For the intervention group, an intermittent neuromuscular electrical stimulation was applied daily for 30 minutes on the right thigh whereas the left thigh was used as a control. Heart rate, respiration rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure and oxygen saturation were monitored before, during and after the electrostimulation. Perimeter of the right and left thighs was measured in both groups every 3 days at 5 cm above the upper edge of the kneecap.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 50 Years to 75 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- . Prior to inclusion in the study, an informed consent was given by the family of the patients which was approved by the local Ethics Committee of the Virga Jesse Hospital and was performed in accordance with the standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients were excluded from the study if they were still able to move their limb actively in spite of the sedation. Patients were also excluded if they had signs of recent ischemia or infarction for less then seven days. Patients with severe orthopaedic or vascular damage, i.e., fractures or oedema in the lower limbs were also excluded. Patients with an augmented risk for neuro electrical stimulation such as open wounds, hemodialysis or an arterial catheter at the stimulation area were also excluded.
Contacts and Locations
More Information
No publications provided
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00442728 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | REVAL300107 |
| Study First Received: | February 11, 2007 |
| Last Updated: | March 1, 2007 |
| Health Authority: | Belgium: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by Provinciale Hogeschool Limburg:
|
Functional electrical stimulation muscular atrophy intensive care |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Lung Diseases Respiration Disorders Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive Hypoventilation Respiratory Insufficiency |
Lung Diseases, Obstructive Respiratory Tract Diseases Signs and Symptoms, Respiratory Signs and Symptoms |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013