Phase I, Escalating, Multiple-Dose, ST-246 Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics 21-Day Trial in Healthy Volunteers (SIGA-246-002)
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
The purpose of this study was to assess the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of a single, daily, oral dose of ST-246 (either 250, 400 or 800mg) administered for 21 days to 30 healthy, fed volunteers.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Healthy |
Drug: ST-246 Drug: Placebo |
Phase 1 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety Study Intervention Model: Factorial Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled, Escalating, Multiple-dose, Phase I Trial to Assess Safety, Tolerability and Pharmacokinetics of ST-246 Administered as a Single Daily Dose for 21 Days in Healthy, Non-fasted Volunteers |
- Number of Study Participants Who Tolerated ST-246 (250, 400 or 800mg) as Determined by Changes in Safety Parameters, According to the Division of Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome (DAIDS) Adverse Events (AE) Grading Table [ Time Frame: Days 1, 6, 14-16, 21-24, 28-31, and 51-53 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
Evaluated safety parameters included:
- physical examination/vital signs
- electrocardiograms (heart rate, PR interval, QRS duration, QT interval, and QTc Bazett)
- laboratory safety tests (hematology, chemistry, urinalysis)
- adverse events (AEs) For a)-c), statistical values (mean, standard deviation, median, minimum, maximum) and changes from baseline (Day 1 pre-dose) to each time-point, were compared to laboratory normal reference ranges. If values for a)-d) were a Grade 3 or higher (in DAIDS AE Table)and ST-246-related, they were considered severe and significant, respectively.
- Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Cmax [ Time Frame: Day 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Cmax: Maximum drug concentration in plasma determined directly from individual concentration-time data
- Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Cmax [ Time Frame: Day 6 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Cmax: Maximum drug concentration in plasma determined directly from individual concentration-time data
- Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Cmax [ Time Frame: Day 21 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Cmax: Maximum drug concentration in plasma determined directly from individual concentration-time data
- Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Tmax [ Time Frame: Day 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Tmax: Time to reach maximum drug concentration in plasma calculated from [plasma] versus time profiles.
- Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Tmax [ Time Frame: Day 6 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Tmax: Time to reach maximum drug concentration in plasma calculated from [plasma] versus time profiles.
- Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Tmax [ Time Frame: Day 21 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Tmax: Time to reach maximum drug concentration in plasma calculated from [plasma] versus time profiles.
- Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: t½ [ Time Frame: Day 21 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]t½: Observed terminal elimination half-life determined after the last dose on Day 21
- Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: AUCtau [ Time Frame: Day 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]AUCtau: Area under the plasma concentration-time curve for each dosing interval (from time 0 to 24 hours sample) determined using the linear trapezoidal rule
- Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: AUCtau [ Time Frame: Day 6 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]AUCtau: Area under the plasma concentration-time curve for each dosing interval (from time 0 to 24 hours sample) determined using the linear trapezoidal rule
- Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: AUCtau [ Time Frame: Day 21 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]AUCtau: Area under the plasma concentration-time curve for each dosing interval (from time 0 to 24 hours sample) determined using the linear trapezoidal rule
- Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Ae(0-24) [ Time Frame: Day 1 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Ae(0-24): Cumulative amount of drug excreted unchanged in urine over 24 hours (three 8-hour collection periods), determined on Days 1 and 21
- Evaluation of Pharmacokinetic Parameters to Assess Interventions: Ae(0-24) [ Time Frame: Day 21 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Ae(0-24): Cumulative amount of drug excreted unchanged in urine over 24 hours (three 8-hour collection periods), determined on Days 1 and 21
| Enrollment: | 30 |
| Study Start Date: | February 2007 |
| Study Completion Date: | February 2008 |
| Primary Completion Date: | February 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: ST-246
250 mg, 400 mg or 800 mg of ST-246 given once daily for 21 days
|
Drug: ST-246
250 mg, 400 mg or 800 mg capsules given once daily for 21 days
Other Name: Tecovirimat
|
|
Placebo Comparator: placebo
Placebo to match ST-246
|
Drug: Placebo
Capsules to match experimental drug
Other Name: Placebo to match ST-246
|
Detailed Description:
This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-escalating, multiple-dose study of orally administered ST-246 to 30 healthy volunteers ages 18-50 years, randomized to receive either active drug (8 subjects) or placebo (2 subjects) in 1 of 3 dosing groups (250, 400 or 800mg groups). Each dose group of 10 was divided into two cohorts of 5 subjects (4 active and 1 placebo). The first cohort was dosed approximately 4-8 weeks before the second cohort of each dose group. Dose groups completed the study treatment approximately 5 weeks prior to the start of the following dose group. Study procedures included several overnight stays, medical history/exam, laboratory testing done by blood draw, and electrocardiograms.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 50 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Subject Inclusion Criteria:
- Healthy volunteers
- Ability to Consent
- Not taking any other medication
- Adequate venous access
- Using adequate birth control
Subject Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to swallow study medication.
- Pregnant or breastfeeding
- Received experimental drug within 30 days of study entry or will participate in any experimental study during the study period.
- Current drug abuse, alcohol abuse, or homelessness.
- Taking concomitant medication
- Lactose Intolerance
- Medical condition; e.g., asthma, diabetes, thyroid disease, angioedema, BMI >35 or <18, hypertension, bleeding disorder, malignancy, seizure, neutropenia, Hepatitis B or C, HIV or AIDS.
- Any condition, occupational reason or other responsibility that, in the judgment of the Investigator, would jeopardize the safety or rights of a volunteer, or render the subject unable to comply with the protocol
Contacts and Locations| United States, Florida | |
| Orlando Clinical Research | |
| Orlando, Florida, United States, 32809 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Thomas C Marbury, MD | Orlando Clinical Research |
More Information
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | Dennis Hruby, SIGA Technologies, Inc. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00431951 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | ST-246 RD PHS 1, DMID 06-0080 |
| Study First Received: | February 2, 2007 |
| Results First Received: | May 29, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | September 15, 2010 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by SIGA Technologies:
|
Healthy Volunteers |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013