Brain Power: Resistance Training and Cognitive Function
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
Primary Objectives:
1. To ascertain whether a 12-month, twice-weekly or once-weekly resistance training (RT) program will significantly improve executive function in community-dwelling women aged 65 to 75 years old compared with a 12-month, twice-weekly stretch and relax (S & R) program (shame exercise). We will assess executive function by standard neuropsychological tests.
Secondary Objectives:
- To describe the neural mechanisms that underpin the observed changes in executive function associated with a 12-month, twice-weekly or once-weekly RT training (by using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI)).
- To investigate whether RT-induced changes in executive function are independently associated with changes in physiological fall risk profile.
- To investigate the dose response of RT (resistance training) on bone health as measured by dual energy x-ray and peripheral quantitative computed tomography.
- To conduct a one-year follow-up after the formal cessation of the resistance training programs to determine the persisting effect of resistance training on cognitive performance, cortical plasticity, physiological falls risk, and bone health.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Healthy |
Behavioral: Exercise Training Behavioral: Exercise training |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Single Group Assignment Masking: Single Blind (Subject) Primary Purpose: Prevention |
| Official Title: | The Effect of Resistance Training on Cognitive Performance, Cortical Plasticity, and Fall Risk in Women Aged 65-75 Years Old: A 12-Month RCT |
- Cognitive Performance of Executive Function [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
- Functional MRI and physiological falls risk [ Time Frame: 12 months ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Estimated Enrollment: | 155 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2007 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | June 2012 |
| Estimated Primary Completion Date: | June 2012 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: 1
Twice weekly resistance training for 52 weeks.
|
Behavioral: Exercise Training
Twice weekly resistance training for 52 weeks.
|
|
Experimental: 2
Once weekly resistance training for 52 weeks.
|
Behavioral: Exercise training
Once weekly resistance training for 52 weeks.
|
|
Experimental: 3
Twice weekly balance and tone training for 52 weeks.
|
Behavioral: Exercise training
Twice weekly resistance training for 52 weeks.
|
Detailed Description:
Primary Research Question: Does resistance training (RT) significantly improve cognitive function, specifically executive function in older women with a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score equal to or greater than 24 (i.e., cognitively intact) compared with a stretch & relax (S & R; control) program?
Secondary Research Questions:
- Are changes in cortical activation associated with RT-induced changes in executive function?
- Are RT-induced improvements in executive function associated with lowered physiological fall risk?
- Is there a dose-response on bone health with RT (resistance training)?
RESEARCH PLAN:
Study Design: A 12-month, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial. Participants: 155 cognitively-intact (i.e., MMSE score > 24), right-handed, sedentary community-dwelling women, aged 65 to 75 years.
Measurement: Measurements will take place at baseline, six month, and trial completion. Standard neuropsychological testing and physiological fall risk assessment will occur at all three measurement sessions. A subset of the participants (20 from each experimental group) will undergo fMRI assessment at baseline and trial completion only. Exercise Classes: Participants will be randomized to a 12-month, twice-weekly or once-weekly RT program or stretch & relax program (control). All exercises will be offered at a Vancouver YMCA with whom we have partnered previously. Sample Size Justification: The sample size of 50 per experimental group (i.e., N = 155) is based on the primary end point of this study, cognitive performance of executive function. SUMMARY: Falls are a major challenge for the senior population. To date, no intervention has significantly reduced falls among those with cognitive impairment. Our immediate primary goal is to test whether RT can improve cognitive performance of executive function; impaired executive function are associated with injurious falls. If this proposed exercise trial proves successful, the RT intervention will be trialed in the future in a larger study powered for falls.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 65 Years to 75 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Female |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | Yes |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Sedentary (less than twice weekly exercising) women aged 65-75 years old without conditions restricting them from exercising.
Contacts and Locations| Canada, British Columbia | |
| Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute Research Pavilion | |
| Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 1L8 | |
| YMCA | |
| Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Y 2Z5 | |
| Principal Investigator: | Teresa Liu-Ambrose, Ph.D | University of British Columbia |
More Information
No publications provided by University of British Columbia
Additional publications automatically indexed to this study by ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier (NCT Number):
| Responsible Party: | University of British Columbia |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00426881 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | H06-03216, ORSIL 06-1737, ORSIL 05-6933 |
| Study First Received: | January 23, 2007 |
| Last Updated: | September 28, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | Canada: Health Canada |
Keywords provided by University of British Columbia:
|
Exercise Resistance training |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 23, 2013