Assessing Efficacy and Safety of Lacosamide Compared to Placebo in Reducing Signs and Symptoms of Fibromyalgia Syndrome.
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- Study Results
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This trial investigated the efficacy and safety of 400mg/day of lacosamide as compared to placebo in reducing the signs and symptoms of fibromyalgia syndrome.
| Condition | Intervention | Phase |
|---|---|---|
|
Fibromyalgia Syndrome |
Drug: Lacosamide Other: Placebo |
Phase 2 |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Double Blind (Subject, Investigator) Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | A Parallel, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Proof of Concept Trial to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of 400 mg/Day Lacosamide Tablets in Subjects With Signs and Symptoms Associated With Fibromyalgia Syndrome |
- Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain Score to the Last 2 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase (Based on the Full Analysis Set) [ Time Frame: Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The average daily pain score is calculated using an 11-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced).
- Change From Baseline in Average Daily Pain Score to the Last 2 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase (Based on the Per Protocol Set) [ Time Frame: Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The average daily pain score is calculated using an 11-point Likert scale, ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced).
- Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total Score to the Last Assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase [ Time Frame: Baseline, Last assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) Total Score ranges from 0 to 100 with higher scores corresponding to a greater impact of fibromyalgia
- Change From Baseline in Total Myalgic Score to the Last Assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase [ Time Frame: Baseline, Last assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Total Myalgic Score ranges from 0 to 54 with higher scores corresponding to a greater level of pain.
- Change From Baseline in Average Daily Interference With Sleep to the Last 2 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase [ Time Frame: Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Sleep scale - the subject rated quality of sleep, from 0 (very good sleep) to 10 (very poor sleep)
- Change From Baseline in Daily Interference With General Activity to the Last 2 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase [ Time Frame: Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]General activity scale - the subject rated how the pain had interfered with general activity, from 0 (did not interfere) to 10 (completely interfered)
- Change From Baseline in Morning Pain Score to the Last 2 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase [ Time Frame: Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12 week Treatment Phase ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]An 11-point Likert scale was used for subjects to assess pain, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced).
- Change From Baseline in Evening Pain Score to the Last 2 Weeks of the 12-week Treatment Phase [ Time Frame: Baseline, Last 2 weeks of the 12 week Treatment Phase ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]An 11-point Likert scale was used for subjects to assess pain, from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced).
- Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Assessment From Baseline to the Last Assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase [ Time Frame: Baseline, Last assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The PGIC is a 7-point self-administered categorical rating scale in which the subject rated the change in pain since starting trial medication (from much worse [score of 1] to much better [score of 7]).
- Change From Baseline in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) Scores to the Last Assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase [ Time Frame: Baseline, Last assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-administered instrument for detecting anxiety and depression in medical outpatients. Scores range from 0 to 21 for each subscale with higher scores reflecting a greater level of anxiety or depression.
- Percentage of Patients Using Rescue Medication During the 12-week Treatment Phase [ Time Frame: 12-week Treatment Phase ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Subjects recorded use of rescue medication for pain in the diary daily in the evening with a Yes/No response.
- Percentage of Patients Using Alcohol for Pain During the 12-week Treatment Phase [ Time Frame: 12-week Treatment Phase ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]Use of alcohol to treat pain in the past 24 hours was recorded (Yes/No response).
- Change From Baseline in Fibromyalgia Symptom Scores to the Last Assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase [ Time Frame: Baseline, Last assessment in the 12-week Treatment Phase ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]All scores range from 0 to 10 with higher scores corresponding to a greater level of symptom severity.
- Lacosamide Plasma Concentration at the End of the Maintenance Phase/ Week 12 [ Time Frame: End of the Maintenance Phase/Week 12 ] [ Designated as safety issue: No ]
| Enrollment: | 159 |
| Study Start Date: | October 2006 |
| Study Completion Date: | February 2008 |
| Primary Completion Date: | February 2008 (Final data collection date for primary outcome measure) |
| Arms | Assigned Interventions |
|---|---|
| Placebo Comparator: Placebo |
Other: Placebo
Matching placebo tablet administered twice daily
|
|
Experimental: Lacosamide
Lacosamide Tablet 400mg daily
|
Drug: Lacosamide
Tablet 400mg daily (200mg twice daily) during 8-week maintenance phase following 4-week titration phase starting at 100mg/day and increasing to 400mg/day at weekly intervals of 100mg
Other Names:
|
Detailed Description:
This was a proof-of-concept study and not powered for statistical comparisons.
The trial consisted of a 4-week Titration Phase, an 8-week Maintenance Phase, a 1-week Taper Phase, and a 2-week Safety Follow-Up Phase. If subjects met the eligibility criteria, they were randomized to receive either lacosamide 400mg/day or placebo during the Maintenance Phase. Subjects assigned to lacosamide were titrated from 100mg/day to 400mg/day at weekly intervals of 100mg. All subjects who completed the 4-week Titration Phase entered an 8-week Maintenance Phase. No dose adjustment was allowed during the Maintenance Phase. The Treatment Phase was defined as the combined Titration and Maintenance Phases.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years to 65 Years |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Males or females, 18 to 65 years old
- Fulfills all 3 points of American College of Rheumatology (ACR) definition for diagnosis of fibromyalgia
- At least moderate pain (pain intensity ≥ 5 on Likert pain scale (0-10) during the 7 days prior to Baseline)
- Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) total score ≥ 50
- Completed an adequate washout period for excluded medications prior to beginning the Baseline Diary Phase
Exclusion Criteria:
- Symptomatic regional or structural rheumatic disease
- Diagnosed neuropathic pain syndrome
- Receiving treatment with neurostimulating devices
- Significant psychopathology
- History of chronic alcohol or drug abuse within 6 months prior to Screening
- Been hospitalized for psychiatric or behavioral reasons within 6 months prior to Screening
- Clinically significant abnormal vitals, cardiac dysfunction and /or arrhythmias
- Taken neuroleptics, serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) or tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs)
- Other medical conditions that could compromise the subject's ability to participate in the study
Contacts and Locations
Show 25 Study Locations| Study Director: | UCB Clinical Trial Call Center | +1 877 822 9493 (UCB) |
More Information
Additional Information:
No publications provided
| Responsible Party: | UCB, Inc. |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00401830 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | SP887 |
| Study First Received: | November 9, 2006 |
| Results First Received: | September 22, 2009 |
| Last Updated: | August 30, 2011 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Food and Drug Administration |
Keywords provided by UCB, Inc.:
|
Fibromyalgia Syndrome Lacosamide Vimpat Harkoseride |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Fibromyalgia Myofascial Pain Syndromes Signs and Symptoms Muscular Diseases |
Musculoskeletal Diseases Rheumatic Diseases Neuromuscular Diseases Nervous System Diseases |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 19, 2013