|
Home
Search
Study Topics
Glossary
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Sponsor: | University Medical Centre Groningen |
|---|---|
| Collaborator: |
Netherlands Heart Foundation |
| Information provided by: | University Medical Centre Groningen |
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00392431 |
Purpose
Our hypothesis is that episodic amiodarone treatment (i.e. amiodarone treatment 1 month prior until 1 month after cardioversion) is associated with a lower morbidity and a higher quality of life compared to continuous prophylactic amiodarone treatment while atrial fibrillation is still effectively suppressed. The latter means that at the end of the study permanent atrial fibrillation is prevented in comparable percentage of patients (70%) in both treatment strategies. However, this will be accomplished at the cost of a higher number of electrical cardioversions (2-3) in the episodic treatment group compared to the continuous treatment group.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Persistant Atrial Fibrillation |
Drug: amiodarone |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Randomized Endpoint Classification: Safety/Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Continuous Versus Episodic Prophylactic Treatment With Oral Amiodarone for the Prevention of Permanent Atrial Fibrillation: a Randomized Study on Morbidity and Quality of Life |
| Estimated Enrollment: | 220 |
| Study Start Date: | January 2003 |
| Study Completion Date: | March 2007 |
Primary objective
To determine differences in adverse event rates between patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who are randomized to episodic amiodarone treatment (EAT) strategy and patients who are randomized to continuous amiodarone treatment (CAT) strategy, while atrial fibrillation is still effectively suppressed.
Adverse events can be related to:
Secondary objective
To determine differences in quality of life between patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who are randomized to the EAT strategy and patients who are randomized to the CAT strategy.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 18 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Contacts and Locations| Netherlands | |
| University Medical Center Groningen | |
| Groningen, Netherlands, 9700RB | |
| Principal Investigator: | Isabelle C Van Gelder, MD | University Medical Centre Groningen |
More Information
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00392431 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | 2000B133 |
| Study First Received: | October 25, 2006 |
| Last Updated: | March 21, 2007 |
| Health Authority: | European Union: European Medicines Agency |
|
Atrial Fibrillation Arrhythmias, Cardiac Heart Diseases Cardiovascular Diseases Pathologic Processes Amiodarone Anti-Arrhythmia Agents |
Cardiovascular Agents Therapeutic Uses Pharmacologic Actions Enzyme Inhibitors Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action Vasodilator Agents |