Right Ventricular Defibrillation Lead Select Site Study
Recruitment status was Recruiting
- Full Text View
- Tabular View
- No Study Results Posted
- Disclaimer
- How to Read a Study Record
Purpose
This study will compare single coil right ventricular defibrillation leads for implanted cardioverter/defibrillators (ICDs) in the apical and high septal locations. It is hypothesized that RV septal positions are at least as good as apical positions using formally measured defibrillation thresholds(DFTs), and that they may have long term advantages in reducing left ventricular dysfunction.
| Condition | Intervention |
|---|---|
|
Heart Failure, Congestive Tachycardia, Ventricular |
Device: RV apical vs RV septal defibrillation threshold testing |
| Study Type: | Interventional |
| Study Design: | Allocation: Non-Randomized Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study Intervention Model: Crossover Assignment Masking: Open Label Primary Purpose: Treatment |
| Official Title: | Right Ventricular Defibrillation Lead Select Site Study |
- Acute defibrillation thresholds
- LV function (LVEF)
- pacing thresholds
- sensing thresholds
- LV diameter
- NYHA class
- weight
| Estimated Enrollment: | 98 |
| Study Start Date: | October 2006 |
| Estimated Study Completion Date: | December 2008 |
The new studies "Right Ventricular Lead/Select Site Registry" and "Right Ventricular Lead/Select Site Registry: Acute Study" are studies designed to look at alternate lead locations for defibrillation leads for ICDs. The registry is designed to capture data from patients who have already undergone implant, so as to be able to publish long term data on defibrillation thresholds, pacing thresholds and left ventricular function. This will include both patients from the acute study, and those patients in whom leads have already been placed, and the exact lead location is known. The acute study is designed to directly compare defibrillation thresholds in the apical location versus the interventricular septal location for defibrillation leads. This study involves a direct comparison of two different sites in the same patient; using defined criteria for implant location (see protocol). The acute study is anticipated to enroll 34 patients, but the registry to collect ongoing data will be larger, encompassing previously implanted patients, with an expected sample size of 61 total in the registry for data collection.
Eligibility| Ages Eligible for Study: | 21 Years and older |
| Genders Eligible for Study: | Both |
| Accepts Healthy Volunteers: | No |
Inclusion Criteria:
- Standard indications for ICD placement (AHA/ACC guidelines)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to consent
- age less than 21 years
- inability to participate in study follow-up
Contacts and Locations| Contact: Michael A Lincoln, MD | 301-681-5700 | mlincoln@associatesincardiology.com |
| United States, Maryland | |
| Holy Cross Hospital of Silver Spring | Recruiting |
| Silver Spring, Maryland, United States, 20910 | |
| Principal Investigator: Michael A Lincoln, MD | |
| Principal Investigator: | Michael A Lincoln, MD | Holy Cross Hospital of Silver Spring |
More Information
No publications provided
| ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: | NCT00385749 History of Changes |
| Other Study ID Numbers: | RVLeadSelectSite |
| Study First Received: | October 10, 2006 |
| Last Updated: | October 30, 2007 |
| Health Authority: | United States: Institutional Review Board |
Keywords provided by Associates in Cardiology, PA:
|
Implanted cardioverter defibrillator congestive heart failure right ventricular lead placement select site pacing |
Additional relevant MeSH terms:
|
Heart Failure Tachycardia Tachycardia, Ventricular Heart Diseases |
Cardiovascular Diseases Arrhythmias, Cardiac Pathologic Processes |
ClinicalTrials.gov processed this record on May 16, 2013