Full Text View
Tabular View
Study Results
Related Studies
ADVANCE: Study to Evaluate Cinacalcet Plus Low Dose Vitamin D on Vascular Calcification in Subjects With Chronic Kidney Disease Receiving Hemodialysis
This study has been completed.
Study NCT00379899   Information provided by Amgen

First Received on September 21, 2006.   Last Updated on January 20, 2011   History of Changes
Results First Received: October 1, 2010  
Study Type: Interventional
Study Design: Allocation: Randomized;   Endpoint Classification: Efficacy Study;   Intervention Model: Parallel Assignment;   Masking: Open Label;   Primary Purpose: Treatment
Conditions: Chronic Kidney Disease
End Stage Renal Disease
Coronary Artery Calcification
Vascular Calcification
Calcification
Cardiovascular Disease
Chronic Renal Failure
Hyperparathyroidism
Kidney Disease
Nephrology
Secondary Hyperparathyroidism
Intervention: Drug: cinacalcet

  Participant Flow
  Hide Participant Flow

Recruitment Details
Key information relevant to the recruitment process for the overall study, such as dates of the recruitment period and locations
Participants were enrolled from 27 October 2006 through 2 May 2008

Pre-Assignment Details
Significant events and approaches for the overall study following participant enrollment, but prior to group assignment
No text entered.

Reporting Groups
  Description
Cinacalcet Cinacalcet plus low dose vitamin D
Control Flexible vitamin D dosing

Participant Flow:   Overall Study
    Cinacalcet     Control  
STARTED     180     180  
COMPLETED     140     140  
NOT COMPLETED     40     40  
Adverse Event                 7                 3  
Death                 10                 10  
Lost to Follow-up                 2                 4  
Physician Decision                 3                 4  
Withdrawal by Subject                 5                 5  
Ineligibility determined                 0                 1  
Noncompliance                 1                 1  
Parathyroidectomy                 0                 2  
Renal transplantation                 5                 4  
Coronary artery bypass graft                 1                 1  
Other protocol-specified criteria                 3                 4  
Other                 3                 1  



  Baseline Characteristics
  Hide Baseline Characteristics

Reporting Groups
  Description
Cinacalcet Cinacalcet plus low dose vitamin D
Control Flexible vitamin D dosing

Baseline Measures
    Cinacalcet     Control     Total  
Number of Participants  
[units: participants]
  180     180     360  
Age  
[units: Years]
Mean ± Standard Deviation
  61.2  ± 12.6     61.8  ± 12.8     61.5  ± 12.7  
Gender  
[units: Participants]
     
Female     68     85     153  
Male     112     95     207  
Race/Ethnicity, Customized  
[units: Participants]
     
American Indian or Alaska Native     1     0     1  
Asian     4     6     10  
Black or African American     45     40     85  
Hispanic or Latino     11     14     25  
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander     2     0     2  
White or Caucasian     116     120     236  
Other     1     0     1  
Coronary Artery Calcification Score Stratification Factor  
[units: Participants]
     
≥30 to 399     67     67     134  
≥400 to 999     47     47     94  
≥1000     66     66     132  



  Outcome Measures
  Show All Outcome Measures

1.  Primary:   Percent Change From Baseline in CAC Score   [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52 ]

2.  Secondary:   Number of Participants Achieving > 15% Progression of CAC.   [ Time Frame: 52 weeks ]

3.  Secondary:   Absolute Change in PTH   [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52 ]

4.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline in AC Score   [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52 ]

5.  Secondary:   Change From Baseline of the Progression of AVC.   [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52 ]

6.  Secondary:   Percent Change in PTH   [ Time Frame: Baseline and Week 52 ]

7.  Secondary:   Absolute Change in Calcium   [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 44 through 52 ]

8.  Secondary:   Percent Change in Calcium   [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 44 through 52 ]

9.  Secondary:   Absolute Change in Phosphorus   [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 44 through 52 ]

10.  Secondary:   Percent Change in Phosphorus   [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 44 through 52 ]

11.  Secondary:   Absolute Change in Ca x P   [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 44 through 52 ]

12.  Secondary:   Percent Change in Ca x P   [ Time Frame: Baseline and Weeks 44 through 52 ]


  Serious Adverse Events
  Show Serious Adverse Events


  Other Adverse Events
  Show Other Adverse Events


  More Information
  Hide More Information

Certain Agreements:  
Principal Investigators are NOT employed by the organization sponsoring the study.
There IS an agreement between Principal Investigators and the Sponsor (or its agents) that restricts the PI's rights to discuss or publish trial results after the trial is completed.
The agreement is:
unchecked The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.
unchecked The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is more than 60 days but less than or equal to 180 days. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo.


Limitations and Caveats
Limitations of the study, such as early termination leading to small numbers of participants analyzed and technical problems with measurement leading to unreliable or uninterpretable data
No text entered.  


Results Point of Contact:  
Name/Title: Study Director
Organization: Amgen Inc.
phone: 866-572-6436


Publications of Results:

Responsible Party: Global Development Leader, Amgen Inc.
ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00379899     History of Changes
Other Study ID Numbers: 20060111
Study First Received: September 21, 2006
Results First Received: October 1, 2010
Last Updated: January 20, 2011
Health Authority: Australia: Therapeutic Goods Administration
European Union: European Medicines Agency
United States: Food and Drug Administration
United States: Institutional Review Board